Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Use to Preserve Renal Function in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation Patients.

Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.043
Colin Hartgerink, Avi Toiv, Arif Sarowar, Ella Todd, Shunji Nagai, Yakir Muszkat, Nemie Beltran, Syed-Mohammed Jafri
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Use to Preserve Renal Function in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation Patients.","authors":"Colin Hartgerink, Avi Toiv, Arif Sarowar, Ella Todd, Shunji Nagai, Yakir Muszkat, Nemie Beltran, Syed-Mohammed Jafri","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As calcineurin inhibitors are associated with renal impairment post intestinal transplant, use of everolimus (EVR) may provide renal-sparing benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis focused on EVR use and renal function after intestinal or multivisceral transplant. No prisoners were used in the study. This study is compliant with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients, 18 patients who underwent isolated intestinal transplant, and 10 patients who underwent multivisceral transplant, were included in this study. For 13 patients that never received EVR, the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline at the time of transplant were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -18.1%; 2 years = -43.7%; 3 years = -44.1; and 5 years = -43.3%. For 15 patients who received EVR after transplant, average duration of EVR therapy was (579.60 ± 784.15) days with 87% of patients ultimately removed from medication due to side effects. In the EVR group, the average change in eGFR compared to baseline were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -37.5%; 2 years = -43.5%; 3 years = -54.2%; and 5 years = -42.9%. After the initiation of EVR, the average change in eGFR compared to eGFR at time of EVR initiation was as follows: 1 year = +5.9%; 2 years = -1.57%; 3 years = -5.01%; and 5 years = -1.79%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that EVR can play an important role in preserving renal function in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients, but tolerance of EVR is highly variable in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"2250-2254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As calcineurin inhibitors are associated with renal impairment post intestinal transplant, use of everolimus (EVR) may provide renal-sparing benefits.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis focused on EVR use and renal function after intestinal or multivisceral transplant. No prisoners were used in the study. This study is compliant with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.

Results: A total of 28 patients, 18 patients who underwent isolated intestinal transplant, and 10 patients who underwent multivisceral transplant, were included in this study. For 13 patients that never received EVR, the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline at the time of transplant were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -18.1%; 2 years = -43.7%; 3 years = -44.1; and 5 years = -43.3%. For 15 patients who received EVR after transplant, average duration of EVR therapy was (579.60 ± 784.15) days with 87% of patients ultimately removed from medication due to side effects. In the EVR group, the average change in eGFR compared to baseline were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -37.5%; 2 years = -43.5%; 3 years = -54.2%; and 5 years = -42.9%. After the initiation of EVR, the average change in eGFR compared to eGFR at time of EVR initiation was as follows: 1 year = +5.9%; 2 years = -1.57%; 3 years = -5.01%; and 5 years = -1.79%.

Conclusions: This study suggests that EVR can play an important role in preserving renal function in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients, but tolerance of EVR is highly variable in this patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用依维莫司保护肠道和多脏器移植患者肾功能的安全性和有效性
背景:由于钙神经蛋白抑制剂与肠道移植后的肾功能损害有关,使用依维莫司(EVR)可能会带来保肾的益处:我们进行了一项回顾性分析,重点关注肠道或多脏器移植后 EVR 的使用和肾功能。研究中未使用囚犯。本研究符合赫尔辛基大会和伊斯坦布尔宣言:本研究共纳入 28 名患者,其中 18 名接受了孤立肠道移植,10 名接受了多脏器移植。在从未接受过 EVR 的 13 名患者中,与移植时的基线相比,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的平均变化如下:移植后 1 年 = -18.1%;2 年 = -43.7%;3 年 = -44.1;5 年 = -43.3%。在移植后接受 EVR 的 15 名患者中,EVR 治疗的平均持续时间为(579.60 ± 784.15)天,87% 的患者最终因副作用而停药。在 EVR 组中,eGFR 与基线相比的平均变化如下:移植后 1 年 = -37.5%;2 年 = -43.5%;3 年 = -54.2%;5 年 = -42.9%。启动 EVR 后,与启动 EVR 时的 eGFR 相比,eGFR 的平均变化如下:1年=+5.9%;2年=-1.57%;3年=-5.01%;5年=-1.79%:这项研究表明,EVR 可在保护肠道和多脏器移植受者的肾功能方面发挥重要作用,但这类患者对 EVR 的耐受性差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enterococcus avium Infection After Liver Transplantation in Vietnam: A Case Report. Detection of Gram-Ghost Bacilli and Additional Ziehl-Neelsen Stain for the Early Diagnosis of Driveline Infection: A Case Report. Paired Exchange Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience From Turkiye. Tolerability and Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Report. Effect of CYP 3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 Gene Polymorphisms in Antirejection of Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1