Efficacy of Ketamine as an Adjuvant to Scalp Block for Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Elective Craniotomy for Supratentorial Glioma: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791269
Ashutosh Kaushal, Sharmishtha Pathak, Priyanka Gupta, Praveen Talwar, Anuj Jain, Sunaina Tejpal Karna
{"title":"Efficacy of Ketamine as an Adjuvant to Scalp Block for Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Elective Craniotomy for Supratentorial Glioma: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ashutosh Kaushal, Sharmishtha Pathak, Priyanka Gupta, Praveen Talwar, Anuj Jain, Sunaina Tejpal Karna","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Scalp nerve block (SNB) attenuates the hemodynamic response to pin insertion and delivers excellent postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SNB using ketamine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine on perioperative hemodynamic responses and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial glioma. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Sixty patients were randomized into two groups. They were given scalp nerve block either with bupivacaine and saline (group S) or bupivacaine and ketamine (group K). Primary outcome was to compare the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at defined time points from baseline. Secondary outcomes included time to request for first analgesia, total analgesic consumption in intraoperative and postoperative periods till 24 hours, and numeric rating scale pain score at various time points in postoperative period till 24 hours. <b>Results</b>  Fifty-seven patients were included in analysis. HR and MAP were comparable intraoperatively till closure. As soon as closure began, a significant increase in HR (group K vs. group S, 69.76 ± 9.03 vs. 93.96 ± 9.98, <i>p</i> -value = < 0.0001) and MAP (group K vs. group S, 79.4 ± 4.12 vs. 87.17 ± 12.67, <i>p</i> -value = 0.002) was noted in group S patients. This increase persisted in the postoperative period as well. The median total opioid consumed during intraoperative period in group K was 200 mcg versus 300 mcg in group S, <i>p</i> -value < 0.0001. <b>Conclusion</b>  Adding ketamine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for SNB not only provides significant hemodynamic stability but also reduces both intra- and postoperative analgesic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"19 4","pages":"760-766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Scalp nerve block (SNB) attenuates the hemodynamic response to pin insertion and delivers excellent postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SNB using ketamine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine on perioperative hemodynamic responses and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial glioma. Materials and Methods  Sixty patients were randomized into two groups. They were given scalp nerve block either with bupivacaine and saline (group S) or bupivacaine and ketamine (group K). Primary outcome was to compare the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at defined time points from baseline. Secondary outcomes included time to request for first analgesia, total analgesic consumption in intraoperative and postoperative periods till 24 hours, and numeric rating scale pain score at various time points in postoperative period till 24 hours. Results  Fifty-seven patients were included in analysis. HR and MAP were comparable intraoperatively till closure. As soon as closure began, a significant increase in HR (group K vs. group S, 69.76 ± 9.03 vs. 93.96 ± 9.98, p -value = < 0.0001) and MAP (group K vs. group S, 79.4 ± 4.12 vs. 87.17 ± 12.67, p -value = 0.002) was noted in group S patients. This increase persisted in the postoperative period as well. The median total opioid consumed during intraoperative period in group K was 200 mcg versus 300 mcg in group S, p -value < 0.0001. Conclusion  Adding ketamine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for SNB not only provides significant hemodynamic stability but also reduces both intra- and postoperative analgesic consumption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮作为头皮阻滞的辅助药物对稳定因脑室上胶质瘤而接受开颅手术的患者血流动力学的效果:前瞻性随机对照试验》。
引言 头皮神经阻滞(SNB)可减轻插针时的血流动力学反应,并提供良好的术后镇痛效果。本研究旨在评估使用氯胺酮辅助布比卡因进行头皮神经阻滞对接受幕上胶质瘤开颅手术的患者围术期血流动力学反应和术后疼痛的疗效。材料和方法 60 名患者被随机分为两组。他们分别接受布比卡因和生理盐水(S 组)或布比卡因和氯胺酮(K 组)头皮神经阻滞。主要结果是比较平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)在规定时间点与基线的变化。次要结果包括要求首次镇痛的时间、术中和术后至 24 小时的镇痛剂总用量,以及术后至 24 小时不同时间点的疼痛评分。结果 57 名患者参与了分析。术中至闭合前,心率和血压相当。关闭手术一开始,S 组患者的心率(K 组 vs. S 组,69.76 ± 9.03 vs. 93.96 ± 9.98,p 值 = < 0.0001)和血压(K 组 vs. S 组,79.4 ± 4.12 vs. 87.17 ± 12.67,p 值 = 0.002)就显著增加。这种增加在术后也持续存在。K 组患者术中阿片类药物总消耗量的中位数为 200 微克,而 S 组为 300 微克,p 值=0.002 结论 在 SNB 中加入氯胺酮作为布比卡因的辅助药物,不仅能显著稳定血流动力学,还能减少术中和术后镇痛药的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Middle Meningeal Artery Aneurysm: A Rare Cause of Recurrent Acute Epidural Hematoma. A Case Report. Case Report and Literature Review: A Severe Case of Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury. Management of Compound Depressed Fractures over Venous Sinuses. The Impact of the Pandemic of COVID-19 on the Head Injury Fast-Track System and Surgical Outcome. The Role of Helmet Therapy in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1