Endovascular Treatment of Mycotic Intracranial Aneurysms: A Series of Three Cases with Institutional Treatment Algorithm.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791268
Bheru Dan Charan, Shailesh B Gaikwad, Sushant Agarwal, Savyasachi Jain
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Mycotic Intracranial Aneurysms: A Series of Three Cases with Institutional Treatment Algorithm.","authors":"Bheru Dan Charan, Shailesh B Gaikwad, Sushant Agarwal, Savyasachi Jain","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycotic intracranial aneurysms (MIAs) are rare but can cause significant morbidity and mortality due to rupture. Most patients have additional systemic medical comorbidities making endovascular treatment a vital modality in the treatment of these aneurysms. We aimed to share our institutional experience with the role of endovascular therapy in the treatment of mycotic aneurysms with a literature review. We conducted a retrospective review of our patient database to identify individuals diagnosed with MIAs who underwent endovascular intervention at our institution between January 2002 and December 2021. We have found three patients with ruptured MIAs. All three patients had a heart disease with infective endocarditis. Two patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in which, one had a rebleed resulting in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the third patient initially presented with ICH. Distal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) was the site of MIA in two cases and distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) in one patient. Two patients were treated with simple coiling and one patient was treated by glue (n-butyl cyanoacrylate [NBCAs]) injection within the aneurysm. There was no periprocedural complication with complete obliteration of the aneurysm and preservation of the parent artery. All the patients had good outcomes on follow-up. Two patients had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 at 6 months and one patient had an mRS score of 3 at the end of 3 months whose preprocedure mRS score was 5. Endovascular embolization of MIAs with coils or liquid embolic agents can be performed in critically ill patients and is an excellent treatment modality with high occlusion rates and low procedural complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"19 4","pages":"618-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycotic intracranial aneurysms (MIAs) are rare but can cause significant morbidity and mortality due to rupture. Most patients have additional systemic medical comorbidities making endovascular treatment a vital modality in the treatment of these aneurysms. We aimed to share our institutional experience with the role of endovascular therapy in the treatment of mycotic aneurysms with a literature review. We conducted a retrospective review of our patient database to identify individuals diagnosed with MIAs who underwent endovascular intervention at our institution between January 2002 and December 2021. We have found three patients with ruptured MIAs. All three patients had a heart disease with infective endocarditis. Two patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in which, one had a rebleed resulting in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the third patient initially presented with ICH. Distal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) was the site of MIA in two cases and distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) in one patient. Two patients were treated with simple coiling and one patient was treated by glue (n-butyl cyanoacrylate [NBCAs]) injection within the aneurysm. There was no periprocedural complication with complete obliteration of the aneurysm and preservation of the parent artery. All the patients had good outcomes on follow-up. Two patients had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 at 6 months and one patient had an mRS score of 3 at the end of 3 months whose preprocedure mRS score was 5. Endovascular embolization of MIAs with coils or liquid embolic agents can be performed in critically ill patients and is an excellent treatment modality with high occlusion rates and low procedural complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
霉菌性颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗:三例系列病例与机构治疗算法。
霉菌性颅内动脉瘤(MIAs)虽然罕见,但可因破裂而导致严重的发病率和死亡率。大多数患者还伴有全身性并发症,因此血管内治疗是治疗这些动脉瘤的重要方法。我们旨在通过文献综述,分享本院在血管内治疗霉菌性动脉瘤方面的经验。我们对患者数据库进行了回顾性审查,以确定 2002 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院接受血管内介入治疗的被诊断为霉菌性动脉瘤的患者。我们发现了三名 MIA 破裂的患者。这三位患者都患有感染性心内膜炎。其中两名患者出现蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),一名患者再次出血导致脑内出血(ICH),第三名患者最初出现 ICH。两例患者的 MIA 发生部位为大脑前动脉(ACA)远端,一例患者的 MIA 发生部位为大脑中动脉(MCA)远端。两名患者接受了简单的卷曲治疗,一名患者接受了动脉瘤内注射胶水(氰基丙烯酸正丁酯 [NBCAs])治疗。治疗过程中没有出现并发症,动脉瘤完全闭塞,并保留了母动脉。所有患者的随访结果均良好。两名患者在 6 个月后的改良兰金量表(mRS)评分为 0,一名患者在 3 个月后的 mRS 评分为 3,而其术前的 mRS 评分为 5。 使用线圈或液体栓塞剂对 MIA 进行血管内栓塞治疗可在重症患者中进行,是一种具有高闭塞率和低手术并发症的出色治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Middle Meningeal Artery Aneurysm: A Rare Cause of Recurrent Acute Epidural Hematoma. A Case Report. Case Report and Literature Review: A Severe Case of Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury. Management of Compound Depressed Fractures over Venous Sinuses. The Impact of the Pandemic of COVID-19 on the Head Injury Fast-Track System and Surgical Outcome. The Role of Helmet Therapy in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1