Balancing work and earnings: The long-term impact on mental health

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117562
Jun-Hong Chen , Yuanyuan Yang , Cao Fang , Chieh-Hsun Huang , Chien-Jen Chiang , Chi-Fang Wu , Melissa Jonson-Reid , Brett Drake
{"title":"Balancing work and earnings: The long-term impact on mental health","authors":"Jun-Hong Chen ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Cao Fang ,&nbsp;Chieh-Hsun Huang ,&nbsp;Chien-Jen Chiang ,&nbsp;Chi-Fang Wu ,&nbsp;Melissa Jonson-Reid ,&nbsp;Brett Drake","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earnings and work hours (e.g., weekly work hours) are key determinants of one's mental health. While higher earnings are linked to better mental health due to reduced financial stress, they may come at the cost of longer work hours harmful for mental health. Therefore, balancing work hours with earnings is crucial for mental health. Using the 2015, 2017, and 2019 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (N = 6,776), this study explores how one's earnings and work hours combine to influence mental health using growth mixture modeling and a negative binomial regression model, with generalized propensity score weighting for causal inference. The findings reveal that working 40 h a week with earnings two to three times the US federal poverty threshold benefits mental health. However, earning more by working 60 h a week does not provide additional mental health benefits. Additionally, individuals with a history of low earnings face a high risk of psychological distress, even as their earnings improve over time. This risk is similar to that experienced by those consistently earning low incomes. Our findings highlight the importance of clarifying work-earning balance for one's mental health as well as identifying people with mental health needs from a longitudinal perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 117562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earnings and work hours (e.g., weekly work hours) are key determinants of one's mental health. While higher earnings are linked to better mental health due to reduced financial stress, they may come at the cost of longer work hours harmful for mental health. Therefore, balancing work hours with earnings is crucial for mental health. Using the 2015, 2017, and 2019 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (N = 6,776), this study explores how one's earnings and work hours combine to influence mental health using growth mixture modeling and a negative binomial regression model, with generalized propensity score weighting for causal inference. The findings reveal that working 40 h a week with earnings two to three times the US federal poverty threshold benefits mental health. However, earning more by working 60 h a week does not provide additional mental health benefits. Additionally, individuals with a history of low earnings face a high risk of psychological distress, even as their earnings improve over time. This risk is similar to that experienced by those consistently earning low incomes. Our findings highlight the importance of clarifying work-earning balance for one's mental health as well as identifying people with mental health needs from a longitudinal perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡工作和收入:对心理健康的长期影响
收入和工作时间(如每周工作时间)是一个人心理健康的关键决定因素。虽然较高的收入与较好的心理健康有关,因为经济压力减轻了,但这可能是以更长的工作时间为代价的,这对心理健康有害。因此,平衡工作时间和收入对心理健康至关重要。本研究利用2015年、2017年和2019年收入动态小组研究(N = 6776)的数据,利用增长混合模型和负二项回归模型,利用广义倾向得分加权进行因果推理,探讨了一个人的收入和工作时间如何共同影响心理健康。研究结果显示,每周工作40小时,收入是美国联邦贫困线的两到三倍,有益于心理健康。然而,每周工作60小时赚得更多并不会给心理健康带来额外的好处。此外,有低收入史的人面临心理困扰的风险很高,即使他们的收入随着时间的推移而提高。这种风险与那些长期收入较低的人所经历的风险相似。我们的研究结果强调了澄清工作收入平衡对一个人的心理健康的重要性,以及从纵向角度确定有心理健康需求的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1