Involving youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness trial: A community-engaged research approach

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101395
K.L. Berg , D Herrman , L Bernard , C.S Shiu , I Mihaila , C Arnold , K Acharya , T.R.G Gladstone , C Danguilan , H Gussin , P Perez , A Herrman , S Aaron , A Thornton , M Gerges , C Patriarca , J.J Pak , B.W Van Voorhees
{"title":"Involving youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness trial: A community-engaged research approach","authors":"K.L. Berg ,&nbsp;D Herrman ,&nbsp;L Bernard ,&nbsp;C.S Shiu ,&nbsp;I Mihaila ,&nbsp;C Arnold ,&nbsp;K Acharya ,&nbsp;T.R.G Gladstone ,&nbsp;C Danguilan ,&nbsp;H Gussin ,&nbsp;P Perez ,&nbsp;A Herrman ,&nbsp;S Aaron ,&nbsp;A Thornton ,&nbsp;M Gerges ,&nbsp;C Patriarca ,&nbsp;J.J Pak ,&nbsp;B.W Van Voorhees","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Practices to include youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) are necessary to design and implement research that specifically meets the behavioral health needs of this population. This article describes a protocol for engaging youth with IDD as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our engagement protocol, guided by the Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Framework, emphasized harm avoidance, accessibility, demonstrated value, capacity bridging and co-learning, shared power and equity in decision-making, accountability and respect, and transparent communication. We involved seven youth with IDD in a Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) and four youth with IDD in a Summer Scholars program, ensuring consistent and structured engagement throughout the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Youth with IDD maintained high levels of engagement in both the YAC and Summer Scholars Program with 100 % retention across two years. Youth used multiple modalities to provide feedback on aspects of the research project, resulting in study modifications, the co-development of products, and tangible improvements in the accessibility and relevance of the study for youth with IDD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Researchers and clinicians seeking to engage the historically underserved population of disabled youth in clinical trial research can leverage our findings to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of their studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542400142X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Practices to include youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) are necessary to design and implement research that specifically meets the behavioral health needs of this population. This article describes a protocol for engaging youth with IDD as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach.

Methods

Our engagement protocol, guided by the Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Framework, emphasized harm avoidance, accessibility, demonstrated value, capacity bridging and co-learning, shared power and equity in decision-making, accountability and respect, and transparent communication. We involved seven youth with IDD in a Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) and four youth with IDD in a Summer Scholars program, ensuring consistent and structured engagement throughout the study.

Results

Youth with IDD maintained high levels of engagement in both the YAC and Summer Scholars Program with 100 % retention across two years. Youth used multiple modalities to provide feedback on aspects of the research project, resulting in study modifications, the co-development of products, and tangible improvements in the accessibility and relevance of the study for youth with IDD.

Conclusion

Researchers and clinicians seeking to engage the historically underserved population of disabled youth in clinical trial research can leverage our findings to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of their studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
Involving youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness trial: A community-engaged research approach Examining recollections of Black women with breast cancer who participated in clinical trials: A grounded practical theory study of patient-provider communication A simple blinding index for randomized controlled trials The effects of alpha-lipoic acid transdermal patch for local subcutaneous fat reduction: A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in overweight volunteers Noninvasive anatomical assessment for ruling out hemodynamically relevant coronary artery anomalies in adults – A comparison of coronary-CT to invasive coronary angiography: The NARCO study design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1