Involving youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness trial: A community-engaged research approach

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101395
K.L. Berg , D Herrman , L Bernard , C.S Shiu , I Mihaila , C Arnold , K Acharya , T.R.G Gladstone , C Danguilan , H Gussin , P Perez , A Herrman , S Aaron , A Thornton , M Gerges , C Patriarca , J.J Pak , B.W Van Voorhees
{"title":"Involving youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness trial: A community-engaged research approach","authors":"K.L. Berg ,&nbsp;D Herrman ,&nbsp;L Bernard ,&nbsp;C.S Shiu ,&nbsp;I Mihaila ,&nbsp;C Arnold ,&nbsp;K Acharya ,&nbsp;T.R.G Gladstone ,&nbsp;C Danguilan ,&nbsp;H Gussin ,&nbsp;P Perez ,&nbsp;A Herrman ,&nbsp;S Aaron ,&nbsp;A Thornton ,&nbsp;M Gerges ,&nbsp;C Patriarca ,&nbsp;J.J Pak ,&nbsp;B.W Van Voorhees","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Practices to include youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) are necessary to design and implement research that specifically meets the behavioral health needs of this population. This article describes a protocol for engaging youth with IDD as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our engagement protocol, guided by the Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Framework, emphasized harm avoidance, accessibility, demonstrated value, capacity bridging and co-learning, shared power and equity in decision-making, accountability and respect, and transparent communication. We involved seven youth with IDD in a Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) and four youth with IDD in a Summer Scholars program, ensuring consistent and structured engagement throughout the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Youth with IDD maintained high levels of engagement in both the YAC and Summer Scholars Program with 100 % retention across two years. Youth used multiple modalities to provide feedback on aspects of the research project, resulting in study modifications, the co-development of products, and tangible improvements in the accessibility and relevance of the study for youth with IDD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Researchers and clinicians seeking to engage the historically underserved population of disabled youth in clinical trial research can leverage our findings to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of their studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542400142X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Practices to include youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) are necessary to design and implement research that specifically meets the behavioral health needs of this population. This article describes a protocol for engaging youth with IDD as collaborators in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach.

Methods

Our engagement protocol, guided by the Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Framework, emphasized harm avoidance, accessibility, demonstrated value, capacity bridging and co-learning, shared power and equity in decision-making, accountability and respect, and transparent communication. We involved seven youth with IDD in a Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) and four youth with IDD in a Summer Scholars program, ensuring consistent and structured engagement throughout the study.

Results

Youth with IDD maintained high levels of engagement in both the YAC and Summer Scholars Program with 100 % retention across two years. Youth used multiple modalities to provide feedback on aspects of the research project, resulting in study modifications, the co-development of products, and tangible improvements in the accessibility and relevance of the study for youth with IDD.

Conclusion

Researchers and clinicians seeking to engage the historically underserved population of disabled youth in clinical trial research can leverage our findings to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of their studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让有智力和/或发育障碍的青年作为合作者参与比较有效性试验:一种社区参与的研究方法
背景实践包括青少年智力和/或发育障碍(IDD)是必要的设计和实施研究,专门满足这一人群的行为健康需求。本文描述了一种利用社区参与研究(CEnR)方法让患有IDD的青年作为合作者参与比较有效性临床试验的方案。方法以社区参与研究(CEnR)框架为指导,我们的参与协议强调避免伤害、可及性、展示价值、能力衔接和共同学习、共享权力和决策公平、问责制和尊重,以及透明的沟通。我们让7名患有IDD的青年参加青年咨询委员会(YAC),让4名患有IDD的青年参加暑期学者项目,确保整个研究过程中始终有组织地参与。结果IDD青年在YAC和夏季学者项目中保持了很高的参与度,两年内保持了100%的参与度。青年使用多种方式对研究项目的各个方面提供反馈,从而修改了研究,共同开发了产品,并切实改善了研究对缺碘症青年的可及性和相关性。研究人员和临床医生可以利用我们的研究结果来提高他们研究的可及性和包容性,以吸引历史上服务不足的残疾青年人群参与临床试验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
A mind-body resilience intervention for emotional distress in cardiac arrest survivors and their informal caregivers - Recovering together after cardiac arrest: Protocol for an open pilot trial. Oral administration of hydrolyzed collagen alleviates pain and enhances functionality in knee osteoarthritis: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Use of the chronic illness research recruitment taxonomy to evaluate recruitment strategies in an eHealth feasibility study. Feasibility trial of STRONG: A digital intervention to improve nutritional management for individuals with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Tools to improve discharge equity: Protocol for the pilot TIDE trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1