Theoretical dimensions for integrating research on anticipatory governance, scientific foresight and sustainable S&T public policy design

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102758
Mateus Panizzon , Raquel Janissek-Muniz
{"title":"Theoretical dimensions for integrating research on anticipatory governance, scientific foresight and sustainable S&T public policy design","authors":"Mateus Panizzon ,&nbsp;Raquel Janissek-Muniz","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The future of Science and Technology (S&amp;T) is a continuous and strategic priority for governments, universities, and organizations, driving societal benefits through innovation, sustainability, and development. However, there is a gap—and a critical opportunity—for research on architectures supporting Anticipatory Governance (AG) that integrates Scientific Foresight (ScF) and the design of sustainable S&amp;T policies, especially at federal and state levels in emerging countries. In this context, this paper aims to enhance understanding of the theoretical dimensions essential for integrating AG, ScF, and sustainable S&amp;T policy design, proposing an emergent systemic framework. Adopting a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), the analysis identifies seven theoretical dimensions that unify these three themes, opening new possibilities for integrated research. This method also supported the development of a systemic framework for Anticipatory Governance, Scientific Foresight, and Sustainable S&amp;T Policy Design, setting up foundational components for further testing, development, implementation, and providing a research agenda for Anticipatory Governance Systems. Implications for systemic and institutional innovation in public management are discussed, indicating that evolving these frameworks could strengthen complex decision-making around public policies and investments in strategic S&amp;T areas involving multiple stakeholders in Foresight and Policy Design, particularly those addressing pressing societal challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102758"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The future of Science and Technology (S&T) is a continuous and strategic priority for governments, universities, and organizations, driving societal benefits through innovation, sustainability, and development. However, there is a gap—and a critical opportunity—for research on architectures supporting Anticipatory Governance (AG) that integrates Scientific Foresight (ScF) and the design of sustainable S&T policies, especially at federal and state levels in emerging countries. In this context, this paper aims to enhance understanding of the theoretical dimensions essential for integrating AG, ScF, and sustainable S&T policy design, proposing an emergent systemic framework. Adopting a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), the analysis identifies seven theoretical dimensions that unify these three themes, opening new possibilities for integrated research. This method also supported the development of a systemic framework for Anticipatory Governance, Scientific Foresight, and Sustainable S&T Policy Design, setting up foundational components for further testing, development, implementation, and providing a research agenda for Anticipatory Governance Systems. Implications for systemic and institutional innovation in public management are discussed, indicating that evolving these frameworks could strengthen complex decision-making around public policies and investments in strategic S&T areas involving multiple stakeholders in Foresight and Policy Design, particularly those addressing pressing societal challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期治理、科学预见与可持续科技公共政策设计整合研究的理论维度
科技的未来是政府、大学和组织的一个持续的战略重点,通过创新、可持续性和发展来推动社会效益。然而,在支持预见性治理(AG)的体系结构研究方面,特别是在新兴国家的联邦和州一级,存在一个缺口和一个关键的机会。预见性治理将科学预见性(ScF)和可持续标准与技术政策的设计结合起来。在此背景下,本文旨在加强对整合农业、可持续发展和可持续发展政策设计所必需的理论维度的理解,并提出一个紧急系统框架。采用系统文献综述(SLR),分析确定了七个理论维度,统一了这三个主题,为综合研究开辟了新的可能性。该方法还支持了预见性治理、科学预见性和可持续标准与技术政策设计的系统框架的发展,为进一步测试、开发和实施奠定了基础,并为预见性治理系统提供了研究议程。本文讨论了公共管理系统和制度创新的影响,指出发展这些框架可以加强围绕公共政策的复杂决策,以及涉及前瞻性和政策设计中多个利益相关者的战略标准和技术领域的投资,特别是那些应对紧迫社会挑战的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
The impact of circular economy, sustainable infrastructure, and green FinTech on biodiversity in Europe: A holistic approach Assessing the ecology of cluster-based enterprise trust networks through percolation theory: Is your business environment trustworthy? Designing engagement: Exploring affordances in freemium digital games Innovative resources driven artificial intelligence orientation: The moderating role of environmental and executives’ characteristics The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1