Examining children’s verb learning in the United States and Japan: Do comparisons help?

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106129
Jane B. Childers , Mutsumi Imai , Masato Ohba , Faith Perry , Leah Marsh
{"title":"Examining children’s verb learning in the United States and Japan: Do comparisons help?","authors":"Jane B. Childers ,&nbsp;Mutsumi Imai ,&nbsp;Masato Ohba ,&nbsp;Faith Perry ,&nbsp;Leah Marsh","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Learning verbs is an important part of learning one’s native language. Prior studies have shown that children younger than 5 years can have difficulty in learning and extending new verbs. The current study extended these studies by showing children multiple events that can be compared during learning, including Japanese- and English-speaking children. In the study, 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds saw two similar events and then one varied (progressive alignment) or three varied (low alignable) events in a learning phase before test, and this was repeated for four sets. Children were asked to extend these novel verbs in easy (non-cross-mapping) and difficult (cross-mapping) test trials. A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant Age by Condition interaction. In contrast to prior results, the 4-year-olds in both languages did well in both conditions and across test trial types. The 3-year-olds, especially in Japanese, performed best in the progressive alignment condition, showing that experience in seeing similar events was useful for verb learning. The 2-year-olds mostly struggled in this task, showing success only in the low-alignment condition, non-cross-mapping (easy) test trial. These are new findings given that no previous study has examined the role of different levels of variability during learning in a cross-language sample, and no prior study has examined the impact of objects at test in this way. This study shows that an important mechanism for verb learning—the comparison of events—could be useful across languages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524002698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning verbs is an important part of learning one’s native language. Prior studies have shown that children younger than 5 years can have difficulty in learning and extending new verbs. The current study extended these studies by showing children multiple events that can be compared during learning, including Japanese- and English-speaking children. In the study, 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds saw two similar events and then one varied (progressive alignment) or three varied (low alignable) events in a learning phase before test, and this was repeated for four sets. Children were asked to extend these novel verbs in easy (non-cross-mapping) and difficult (cross-mapping) test trials. A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant Age by Condition interaction. In contrast to prior results, the 4-year-olds in both languages did well in both conditions and across test trial types. The 3-year-olds, especially in Japanese, performed best in the progressive alignment condition, showing that experience in seeing similar events was useful for verb learning. The 2-year-olds mostly struggled in this task, showing success only in the low-alignment condition, non-cross-mapping (easy) test trial. These are new findings given that no previous study has examined the role of different levels of variability during learning in a cross-language sample, and no prior study has examined the impact of objects at test in this way. This study shows that an important mechanism for verb learning—the comparison of events—could be useful across languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察美国和日本儿童的动词学习:比较有帮助吗?
学习动词是学习母语的重要组成部分。先前的研究表明,5岁以下的儿童在学习和扩展新动词方面可能有困难。目前的研究扩展了这些研究,向儿童展示了在学习过程中可以比较的多个事件,包括日语和英语儿童。在这项研究中,2岁、3岁和4岁的孩子在测试前的学习阶段看到了两个类似的事件,然后一个变化(渐进对齐)或三个变化(低对齐)事件,这一过程重复了四组。孩子们被要求在简单(非交叉映射)和困难(交叉映射)的测试中扩展这些新动词。重复测量方差分析显示显著的年龄-条件相互作用。与之前的结果相比,使用两种语言的4岁儿童在两种情况下和测试类型中都表现良好。3岁的孩子,尤其是日语孩子,在渐进式对齐条件下表现最好,这表明看到类似事件的经历对动词学习很有用。2岁儿童在此任务中大多表现困难,仅在低对齐条件下,非交叉映射(简单)测试中表现成功。这些都是新的发现,因为之前没有研究考察过跨语言样本学习过程中不同水平的可变性的作用,也没有研究以这种方式考察过测试对象的影响。这项研究表明,动词学习的一个重要机制——事件比较——可能对不同语言都有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
The relation of verbal and nonverbal skills to basic numerical processing of preterm versus term-born preschoolers. Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. Is counting a bad idea? Complex relations among children's fraction knowledge, eye movements, and performance in visual fraction comparisons. Can gamification improve children's performance in mental rotation? Examining the factor structure of the home learning environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1