Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Early Childhood Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.11.007
Kristen A Copeland , Alexis Amsterdam , Heather Gerker , Desire Bennett , Julietta Ladipo , Amy King
{"title":"Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines","authors":"Kristen A Copeland ,&nbsp;Alexis Amsterdam ,&nbsp;Heather Gerker ,&nbsp;Desire Bennett ,&nbsp;Julietta Ladipo ,&nbsp;Amy King","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous studies have examined the processes parents use in accessing early care and education (ECE) for their children and the barriers parents face to enroll. To our knowledge, previous studies have not engaged both parents and frontline ECE enrollment staff as co-investigators to examine family perspectives and a systems perspective simultaneously. This qualitative study compiled a research team of diverse (family, provider, academic) perspectives combining principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and human-centered design in peer-led qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 20), focus groups (<em>n</em> = 5) with local ECE staff and managers, and several community synthesis and design sessions (<em>n</em> = 6) with caregivers, ECE staff, and local thought leaders in Cincinnati, Ohio. The goals of the study were to: 1) identify policy-relevant and system-level barriers that keep families with low incomes or families of color from enrolling in high-quality ECE programs and 2) co-design potential policy- and system-interventions or prototypes with parents and local ECE agency partners to overcome these barriers. Nine types of barriers in three categories were elucidated by parents and ECE staff: 1) enrollment barriers such as parents’ lack of awareness of options, excessive and redundant paperwork, outdated technologies used, and lack of transparency paired with poor follow-up communication from ECE staff; 2) practical and logistical barriers such as cost, transportation, and concerns about COVID; and 3) human-factors concerns related to safety, trust, and diversity of ECE environment. Peer researchers co-created eight policy- or system- prototypes or interventions to address these barriers. While our findings suggest that access challenges remain ubiquitous locally, they also demonstrate what is possible when researchers and policymakers intentionally involve targeted users of ECE policy in the designs of those policies and systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 12-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624001571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the processes parents use in accessing early care and education (ECE) for their children and the barriers parents face to enroll. To our knowledge, previous studies have not engaged both parents and frontline ECE enrollment staff as co-investigators to examine family perspectives and a systems perspective simultaneously. This qualitative study compiled a research team of diverse (family, provider, academic) perspectives combining principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and human-centered design in peer-led qualitative interviews (n = 20), focus groups (n = 5) with local ECE staff and managers, and several community synthesis and design sessions (n = 6) with caregivers, ECE staff, and local thought leaders in Cincinnati, Ohio. The goals of the study were to: 1) identify policy-relevant and system-level barriers that keep families with low incomes or families of color from enrolling in high-quality ECE programs and 2) co-design potential policy- and system-interventions or prototypes with parents and local ECE agency partners to overcome these barriers. Nine types of barriers in three categories were elucidated by parents and ECE staff: 1) enrollment barriers such as parents’ lack of awareness of options, excessive and redundant paperwork, outdated technologies used, and lack of transparency paired with poor follow-up communication from ECE staff; 2) practical and logistical barriers such as cost, transportation, and concerns about COVID; and 3) human-factors concerns related to safety, trust, and diversity of ECE environment. Peer researchers co-created eight policy- or system- prototypes or interventions to address these barriers. While our findings suggest that access challenges remain ubiquitous locally, they also demonstrate what is possible when researchers and policymakers intentionally involve targeted users of ECE policy in the designs of those policies and systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么欧洲经委会的招生如此复杂?来自前线的障碍分析和共同创造的解决方案
许多研究调查了父母为孩子获得早期护理和教育(ECE)的过程,以及父母在入学时面临的障碍。据我们所知,以前的研究没有让父母和前线ECE招生人员作为共同调查人员同时检查家庭观点和系统观点。本定性研究汇集了一个研究团队,从不同的角度(家庭、提供者、学术)出发,结合基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)和以人为本的设计原则,进行同行主导的定性访谈(n = 20),与当地欧洲经委会工作人员和管理人员进行焦点小组(n = 5),并在俄亥俄州辛辛那提市与护理人员、欧洲经委会工作人员和当地思想领袖进行了几次社区综合和设计会议(n = 6)。该研究的目标是:1)确定使低收入家庭或有色人种家庭无法参加高质量的欧洲经委会项目的政策相关和系统层面的障碍;2)与家长和当地欧洲经委会机构合作伙伴共同设计潜在的政策和系统干预措施或原型,以克服这些障碍。家长和欧洲经委会工作人员指出了三类九种障碍:1)入学障碍,如家长缺乏对选择的认识、文书工作过多和冗余、使用过时的技术、缺乏透明度以及欧洲经委会工作人员后续沟通不力;2)实际和后勤障碍,如成本、运输和对COVID的担忧;3)与欧洲经委会环境的安全、信任和多样性有关的人为因素问题。同行研究人员共同创建了八个政策或系统原型或干预措施来解决这些障碍。虽然我们的研究结果表明,获取挑战在当地仍然普遍存在,但它们也表明,当研究人员和政策制定者有意地让欧洲经委会政策的目标用户参与这些政策和系统的设计时,是有可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Daycare instability during COVID-19, child psychosocial functioning, and the parent-child relationship: A combined retrospective and prospective study Corrigendum to “Examining the relationship between discrimination, access to material resources, and black children's behavioral functioning during COVID-19” [Early Childhood Research Quarterly Volume 62, 1st Quarter 2023, Pages 335-346] Best practices for designing and reporting caregiver training in early childhood mathematics interventions Can the sustaining environments hypothesis be sustained? Testing moderation of sustained public preschool benefits by kindergarten classroom quality Fostering toddlers’ numeracy and mathematical language skills through a professional development intervention on interaction quality in toddler classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1