L. Richter , S. Pauge , K. Mehlis , A. Zueger , B. Surmann , V. Mathies , W. Greiner , T. Ernst , E.C. Winkler , N. Menold
{"title":"Measuring financial distress in German cancer patients: development and validation of the Financial Distress of Cancer Assessment Tool (FIAT)","authors":"L. Richter , S. Pauge , K. Mehlis , A. Zueger , B. Surmann , V. Mathies , W. Greiner , T. Ernst , E.C. Winkler , N. Menold","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer diagnosis and therapy can lead to significant financial distress for those affected, even in universal health care systems. We present the development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for financial distress in German cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Validation of the newly developed instrument followed a two-step approach, including two quantitative paper–pencil surveys (<em>N1</em> = 111, <em>N2</em> = 267) with patients of all types of cancer and treatment status at two German university hospitals. Factorial validity, reliability, construct, and criterion validity were assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, correlative and linear regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Financial Distress of Cancer Assessment Tool (FIAT) comprises 19 items across three domains of subjective financial distress: (i) financial worries; (ii) dissatisfaction across various life domains, and (iii) challenging experiences with authorities and benefit providers (e.g. employment agency, health insurance). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the instrument’s factorial structure. Composite reliability (Raykov’s rho) ranges from 0.88 to 0.96, and retest reliability ranges from 0.64 to 0.75. Correlational analyses showed significant associations between FIAT scores and related constructs [e.g. correlations with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 financial distress subscale (Q28) ranging from 0.47 to 0.60], supporting its construct validity. Additionally, higher FIAT scores were significantly associated with lower health-related quality of life measured by Q29 and Q30 of the EORTC-QLQ-C30, with correlations ranging from −0.21 to −0.28. They were also positively correlated with depression (PHQ-4), with correlations ranging from 0.33 to 0.45, and anxiety (PHQ-4) with correlations ranging from 0.25 to 0.36, confirming its criterion validity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The newly developed patient-reported outcome measure is the first reported measurement tool to assess financial distress in German cancer patients. The instrument can be used for research purposes and to enable the provision of coordinated support services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"9 12","pages":"Article 103992"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702924017629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cancer diagnosis and therapy can lead to significant financial distress for those affected, even in universal health care systems. We present the development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for financial distress in German cancer patients.
Methods
Validation of the newly developed instrument followed a two-step approach, including two quantitative paper–pencil surveys (N1 = 111, N2 = 267) with patients of all types of cancer and treatment status at two German university hospitals. Factorial validity, reliability, construct, and criterion validity were assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, correlative and linear regression analysis.
Results
The Financial Distress of Cancer Assessment Tool (FIAT) comprises 19 items across three domains of subjective financial distress: (i) financial worries; (ii) dissatisfaction across various life domains, and (iii) challenging experiences with authorities and benefit providers (e.g. employment agency, health insurance). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the instrument’s factorial structure. Composite reliability (Raykov’s rho) ranges from 0.88 to 0.96, and retest reliability ranges from 0.64 to 0.75. Correlational analyses showed significant associations between FIAT scores and related constructs [e.g. correlations with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 financial distress subscale (Q28) ranging from 0.47 to 0.60], supporting its construct validity. Additionally, higher FIAT scores were significantly associated with lower health-related quality of life measured by Q29 and Q30 of the EORTC-QLQ-C30, with correlations ranging from −0.21 to −0.28. They were also positively correlated with depression (PHQ-4), with correlations ranging from 0.33 to 0.45, and anxiety (PHQ-4) with correlations ranging from 0.25 to 0.36, confirming its criterion validity.
Conclusions
The newly developed patient-reported outcome measure is the first reported measurement tool to assess financial distress in German cancer patients. The instrument can be used for research purposes and to enable the provision of coordinated support services.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.