A VNS method for the conditional p-next center problem

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Operations Research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2024.106916
Jelena Tasić, Zorica Dražić, Zorica Stanimirović
{"title":"A VNS method for the conditional p-next center problem","authors":"Jelena Tasić,&nbsp;Zorica Dražić,&nbsp;Zorica Stanimirović","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2024.106916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper considers the conditional <span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-next center problem (CPNCP) and proposes a metaheuristic method as a solution approach. The <span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-next center problem (PNCP) is an extension of the classical <span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-center problem that captures real-life situations when centers suddenly fail due to an accident or some other problem. When the center failure happens, the customers allocated to the closed center are redirected to the center closest to the closed one, called the backup center. On the other hand, when a service network expands, some of the existing centers are usually retained and a number of new centers are opened. The conditional <span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-next center problem involves both of these two aspects that arise in practice and, to the best of our knowledge, has not been considered in the literature so far. Since the CPNCP is NP-hard, a metaheuristic algorithm based on the Variable Neighborhood Search is developed. The proposed VNS includes an efficient implementation of the Fast Interchange heuristic which enables the VNS to tackle with real-life problem dimensions. The exhaustive computational experiments were performed on the modified PNCP test instances from the literature with up to 900 nodes. The obtained results are compared with the results of the exact solver CPLEX. It is shown that the proposed VNS reaches optimal solutions or improves the feasible ones provided by CPLEX in a significantly shorter CPU time. The VNS also quickly returns its best solutions when CPLEX failed to provide a feasible one. In order to investigate the effects of two different approaches in service network planning, the VNS solutions of the CPNCP are compared with the optimal or best-known solutions of the <span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-next center problem. In addition, the conducted computational study includes direct comparisons of the results obtained when the proposed SVNS is applied to PNCP (by setting the number of existing centers to 0) with the results of recent solution methods proposed for the PNCP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106916"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054824003885","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the conditional p-next center problem (CPNCP) and proposes a metaheuristic method as a solution approach. The p-next center problem (PNCP) is an extension of the classical p-center problem that captures real-life situations when centers suddenly fail due to an accident or some other problem. When the center failure happens, the customers allocated to the closed center are redirected to the center closest to the closed one, called the backup center. On the other hand, when a service network expands, some of the existing centers are usually retained and a number of new centers are opened. The conditional p-next center problem involves both of these two aspects that arise in practice and, to the best of our knowledge, has not been considered in the literature so far. Since the CPNCP is NP-hard, a metaheuristic algorithm based on the Variable Neighborhood Search is developed. The proposed VNS includes an efficient implementation of the Fast Interchange heuristic which enables the VNS to tackle with real-life problem dimensions. The exhaustive computational experiments were performed on the modified PNCP test instances from the literature with up to 900 nodes. The obtained results are compared with the results of the exact solver CPLEX. It is shown that the proposed VNS reaches optimal solutions or improves the feasible ones provided by CPLEX in a significantly shorter CPU time. The VNS also quickly returns its best solutions when CPLEX failed to provide a feasible one. In order to investigate the effects of two different approaches in service network planning, the VNS solutions of the CPNCP are compared with the optimal or best-known solutions of the p-next center problem. In addition, the conducted computational study includes direct comparisons of the results obtained when the proposed SVNS is applied to PNCP (by setting the number of existing centers to 0) with the results of recent solution methods proposed for the PNCP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
条件p-下一中心问题的VNS方法
本文考虑了条件p-下一中心问题(CPNCP),提出了一种元启发式求解方法。下一个p中心问题(PNCP)是经典p中心问题的扩展,它捕获了由于事故或其他问题导致中心突然失效的现实情况。当中心发生故障时,分配到关闭中心的客户被重定向到离关闭中心最近的中心,称为备份中心。另一方面,当一个服务网络扩大时,通常会保留一些现有的中心,并开设一些新的中心。条件p-下一中心问题涉及到实践中出现的这两个方面,据我们所知,迄今为止还没有在文献中得到考虑。针对CPNCP的np困难特性,提出了一种基于变邻域搜索的元启发式算法。提出的VNS包括快速交换启发式的有效实现,使VNS能够处理现实生活中的问题维度。在文献中改进的PNCP测试实例上进行了详尽的计算实验,其节点数高达900个。所得结果与精确求解器CPLEX的结果进行了比较。结果表明,所提出的VNS在较短的CPU时间内达到了最优解或改进了CPLEX提供的可行解。当CPLEX无法提供可行的解决方案时,VNS也会迅速返回最佳解决方案。为了研究两种不同方法在业务网络规划中的效果,将CPNCP的VNS解与p-next中心问题的最优解或最知名解进行了比较。此外,所进行的计算研究包括将所提出的SVNS应用于PNCP(通过将现有中心数量设置为0)时获得的结果与最近提出的PNCP解决方法的结果进行直接比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A literature review of reinforcement learning methods applied to job-shop scheduling problems An accelerated Benders decomposition method for distributionally robust sustainable medical waste location and transportation problem Lexicographic optimization-based approaches to learning a representative model for multi-criteria sorting with non-monotonic criteria Portfolio optimisation: Bridging the gap between theory and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1