Medicare reimbursement for interventional pain procedures: 2000 to 2023

Alexander M. Park , Aditya Khurana , Roger R. Wang , Adam E.M. Eltorai
{"title":"Medicare reimbursement for interventional pain procedures: 2000 to 2023","authors":"Alexander M. Park ,&nbsp;Aditya Khurana ,&nbsp;Roger R. Wang ,&nbsp;Adam E.M. Eltorai","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An analysis of the financial trends of Interventional Pain (IP) procedures in the United States is lacking. Understanding these relations is necessary to help optimize future IP care delivery and costs.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine Medicare reimbursement trends for IP procedures in both facility and non-facility settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, reimbursement data for 32 of the most performed IP procedures was collected between 2000 and 2023 for both facility and non-facility clinical sites. After adjusting for inflation, annual change, total percent change, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were calculated for each procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following inflation adjustments, the average reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 61.31 % for facility procedures over the study period and by 60.40 % for non-facility procedures. The average adjusted reimbursement rate for facility procedures decreased by $6.76 per year with an average CAGR of −4.38 %, while the average adjusted reimbursement rate for non-facility procedures decreased by $18.66 per year with an average CAGR of −4.48 %. A two-tailed <em>t</em>-test was performed between facility and non-facility groups for total percent change (P = 0.803), annual change (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and CAGR (<em>P</em> = 0.746).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medicare reimbursement rates in both facility and non-facility settings have decreased from 2000 to 2023, with non-facility procedures experiencing a significantly larger decrease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259442400147X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An analysis of the financial trends of Interventional Pain (IP) procedures in the United States is lacking. Understanding these relations is necessary to help optimize future IP care delivery and costs.

Objective

To examine Medicare reimbursement trends for IP procedures in both facility and non-facility settings.

Methods

Utilizing the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, reimbursement data for 32 of the most performed IP procedures was collected between 2000 and 2023 for both facility and non-facility clinical sites. After adjusting for inflation, annual change, total percent change, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were calculated for each procedure.

Results

Following inflation adjustments, the average reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 61.31 % for facility procedures over the study period and by 60.40 % for non-facility procedures. The average adjusted reimbursement rate for facility procedures decreased by $6.76 per year with an average CAGR of −4.38 %, while the average adjusted reimbursement rate for non-facility procedures decreased by $18.66 per year with an average CAGR of −4.48 %. A two-tailed t-test was performed between facility and non-facility groups for total percent change (P = 0.803), annual change (P < 0.001), and CAGR (P = 0.746).

Conclusion

Medicare reimbursement rates in both facility and non-facility settings have decreased from 2000 to 2023, with non-facility procedures experiencing a significantly larger decrease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介入性疼痛治疗的医疗保险报销:2000年至2023年
背景:目前缺乏对美国介入性疼痛(IP)手术的财务趋势的分析。了解这些关系对于帮助优化未来的知识产权医疗服务和成本是必要的。目的探讨医疗机构和非医疗机构中知识产权程序的医疗报销趋势。方法利用医疗保险和医疗补助中心的医师收费表查询工具,收集2000年至2023年间32个执行最多的IP程序的报销数据,包括设施和非设施临床站点。在对通货膨胀进行调整后,计算每个程序的年变化、总变化百分比和复合年增长率(CAGR)。结果在通货膨胀调整后,在研究期间,设施程序的平均报销率平均下降了61.31%,非设施程序的平均报销率下降了60.40%。设施程序的平均调整偿还率每年下降6.76美元,平均复合年增长率为- 4.38%,而非设施程序的平均调整偿还率每年下降18.66美元,平均复合年增长率为- 4.48%。在设施组和非设施组之间进行双尾t检验,比较总变化百分比(P = 0.803)、年变化(P <;0.001), CAGR (P = 0.746)。结论从2000年到2023年,医疗机构和非医疗机构的医疗保险报销率都有所下降,其中非医疗机构的报销率下降幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1