Experimental and numerical study on the residual seismic performance of post-blast RC piers

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109126
Y.H. Cheng, J.P. Xu, H. Wu
{"title":"Experimental and numerical study on the residual seismic performance of post-blast RC piers","authors":"Y.H. Cheng,&nbsp;J.P. Xu,&nbsp;H. Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aiming to evaluate the serviceability performance of bridge piers after potential terrorist attacks or accidental explosions, the residual seismic performance of post-blast reinforced concrete (RC) piers was studied by performing the test and numerical simulation. Firstly, the field explosion and successive lateral cyclic loading tests were performed on two 1/2-scale RC piers, and a single lateral cyclic loading test was performed on two intact control piers for comparison. The test data such as the incident overpressure-time histories, as well as the damage profiles, hysteretic curves and skeleton curves of piers, etc. were obtained and fully discussed. Then, an integrated finite element (FE) analysis approach based on the explicit–implicit switching algorithm was proposed to reproduce the dynamic and quasi-static responses of RC piers under blast and successive lateral cyclic loadings. Furthermore, four commonly used concrete material models were systematically compared and evaluated based on the basic mechanical property, explosion, and lateral cyclic loading tests. Finally, by comparing with the test data, the applicability of concrete material models and corresponding parameters, as well as the proposed integrated FE analysis approach for the residual seismic performance analysis of post-blast RC piers were verified comprehensively. It is concluded that: (i) after 0.5 kg TNT explosion, the positive yield and peak forces obtained from the lateral cyclic loading test are close to those of the intact control piers, whereas the negative yield and peak forces decrease to 66 % and 70 % of the intact ones; (ii) after 1.0 kg TNT explosion, the positive yield and peak forces are 77 % and 81 % of the intact values, while the negative yield and peak forces are only 37 % and 42 % of the intact ones; (iii) by replacing the explicit algorithm with implicit algorithm during the residual seismic performance analysis, the computational cost is saved by about 70 times; (iv) Winfrith concrete model can better predict the residual seismic performance of post-blast RC piers, with the deviations limited in 20 %. The present work can provide a reference for the designer and researchers in evaluating the seismic performance of the post-blast RC bridge piers during the whole service life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 109126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724011725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aiming to evaluate the serviceability performance of bridge piers after potential terrorist attacks or accidental explosions, the residual seismic performance of post-blast reinforced concrete (RC) piers was studied by performing the test and numerical simulation. Firstly, the field explosion and successive lateral cyclic loading tests were performed on two 1/2-scale RC piers, and a single lateral cyclic loading test was performed on two intact control piers for comparison. The test data such as the incident overpressure-time histories, as well as the damage profiles, hysteretic curves and skeleton curves of piers, etc. were obtained and fully discussed. Then, an integrated finite element (FE) analysis approach based on the explicit–implicit switching algorithm was proposed to reproduce the dynamic and quasi-static responses of RC piers under blast and successive lateral cyclic loadings. Furthermore, four commonly used concrete material models were systematically compared and evaluated based on the basic mechanical property, explosion, and lateral cyclic loading tests. Finally, by comparing with the test data, the applicability of concrete material models and corresponding parameters, as well as the proposed integrated FE analysis approach for the residual seismic performance analysis of post-blast RC piers were verified comprehensively. It is concluded that: (i) after 0.5 kg TNT explosion, the positive yield and peak forces obtained from the lateral cyclic loading test are close to those of the intact control piers, whereas the negative yield and peak forces decrease to 66 % and 70 % of the intact ones; (ii) after 1.0 kg TNT explosion, the positive yield and peak forces are 77 % and 81 % of the intact values, while the negative yield and peak forces are only 37 % and 42 % of the intact ones; (iii) by replacing the explicit algorithm with implicit algorithm during the residual seismic performance analysis, the computational cost is saved by about 70 times; (iv) Winfrith concrete model can better predict the residual seismic performance of post-blast RC piers, with the deviations limited in 20 %. The present work can provide a reference for the designer and researchers in evaluating the seismic performance of the post-blast RC bridge piers during the whole service life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Experimental and numerical study on the residual seismic performance of post-blast RC piers Effect of platform design of dental implant abutment on loosening and fatigue performance Research on the relationship between thermal aging of lubricating grease outside the contact area of bearing rolling elements and bearing lubrication failure Investigating the failure mechanism of an aircraft longeron fitting and devising the mitigation techniques Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1