Psychometric properties of the French version of the climate change worry scale

Sarah Shepherd, Patrick Raynal, Myriam Guedj
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the French version of the climate change worry scale","authors":"Sarah Shepherd,&nbsp;Patrick Raynal,&nbsp;Myriam Guedj","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>As concern over climate change keeps growing, there is a need for reliable tools to assess the psychological impact of this global issue across different languages. This study presents the first French adaptation of the Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS) and evaluates its psychometric properties. The CCWS, originally developed in English, is a 10-item self-report measure assessing personal worry about climate change.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 442 participants (82.1% female, mean age = 32.45, SD = 12.50) completed the CCWS along with the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CCWS showed robust internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega values of 0.91. Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the CCWS and CCAS (<em>r</em> = 0.79). Divergent validity was shown by weaker correlations with general worry assessed with PSWQ (<em>r</em> = 0.31) and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress measured with DASS (<em>r</em> = 0.24–0.30). An exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution for the CCWS, explaining 51% of the variance. Factor loadings of the ten items ranged from 0.61 to 0.82. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an adequate fit for a reduced six-item version of the scale.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that the French version of the CCWS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring climate change worry. Its strong psychometric properties make it suitable for use in French-speaking populations, enabling future cross-cultural research on climate-related psychological impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

As concern over climate change keeps growing, there is a need for reliable tools to assess the psychological impact of this global issue across different languages. This study presents the first French adaptation of the Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS) and evaluates its psychometric properties. The CCWS, originally developed in English, is a 10-item self-report measure assessing personal worry about climate change.

Methods

A total of 442 participants (82.1% female, mean age = 32.45, SD = 12.50) completed the CCWS along with the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS).

Results

The CCWS showed robust internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega values of 0.91. Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the CCWS and CCAS (r = 0.79). Divergent validity was shown by weaker correlations with general worry assessed with PSWQ (r = 0.31) and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress measured with DASS (r = 0.24–0.30). An exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution for the CCWS, explaining 51% of the variance. Factor loadings of the ten items ranged from 0.61 to 0.82. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an adequate fit for a reduced six-item version of the scale.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the French version of the CCWS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring climate change worry. Its strong psychometric properties make it suitable for use in French-speaking populations, enabling future cross-cultural research on climate-related psychological impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国版气候变化担忧量表的心理测量特性
随着人们对气候变化的关注不断增加,我们需要一种可靠的工具来评估这一全球问题对不同语言的心理影响。本研究首次提出法国版的气候变化忧虑量表(CCWS),并评估其心理测量特性。CCWS最初是用英语开发的,是一项包含10个项目的自我报告,评估个人对气候变化的担忧。方法共442名参与者(女性82.1%,平均年龄32.45岁,SD = 12.50)完成了CCWS、气候变化焦虑量表(CCAS)、宾夕法尼亚州立大学焦虑问卷(PSWQ)和抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS)。结果CCWS具有较强的内部一致性,Cronbach’s alpha和McDonald’s omega值均为0.91。CCWS和CCAS之间的强相关性支持了收敛效度(r = 0.79)。发散效度与PSWQ评估的一般忧虑(r = 0.31)和DASS测量的抑郁、焦虑和压力症状(r = 0.24-0.30)的相关性较弱。探索性因素分析支持CCWS的单因素解决方案,解释了51%的方差。十个项目的因子负荷在0.61 ~ 0.82之间。随后的验证性因素分析证实,该量表的六项精简版本是适当的。结论法语版CCWS是一种可靠有效的气候变化担忧度测量工具。其强大的心理测量特性使其适合在法语人群中使用,从而使未来有关气候相关心理影响的跨文化研究成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
A review of studies assessing the benefits of clean air and climate mitigation policies for child and adult health Trends in non-profit hospitals’ investments in community environmental improvements in New Jersey, 2010–2018 Climate change, modern slavery, and its impact on health – A youth perspective and global call to action Corrigendum to “Climate change and women's health in the United States: Impacts and opportunities” [J Clim Change Health 8C (2022) 100169] Exploring Portuguese physicians' perceptions of climate change impacts on health: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1