Development and validation of the chronic condition physician-patient relationship scale (CC-PPR): A patient-informed measurement tool

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108492
Jessica A. Eigeland , Nicola Sheeran , Liz Jones , Robyn L. Moffitt
{"title":"Development and validation of the chronic condition physician-patient relationship scale (CC-PPR): A patient-informed measurement tool","authors":"Jessica A. Eigeland ,&nbsp;Nicola Sheeran ,&nbsp;Liz Jones ,&nbsp;Robyn L. Moffitt","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Several tools exist to measure the physician-patient relationship; however few are specific to those with chronic physical health conditions, and none to date have been derived from the patient’s perspective. This research aimed to develop and validate a patient-informed tool for measuring the physician-patient relationship with patients who have a chronic physical health condition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><strong>Study 1:</strong> An Australian sample of participants with a diagnosed chronic physical health condition and a self-reported good physician-patient relationship completed a three round Delphi poll to determine items of the chronic condition physician-patient relationship scale (CC-PPR). Fifty-two participants completed round one, 33 completed round two, and 24 completed all three rounds. <strong>Study 2:</strong> Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted on a separate sample (<em>N</em> = 226) to explore the factor structure of the CC-PPR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CC-PPR comprised 22 items within a single-factor structure which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.97) and sound convergent validity.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The CC-PPR reliably measures observable, concrete, and specific physician behaviours that patients with chronic physical health conditions believe are critical in forming a good physician-patient relationship. The CC-PPR has potential application in research, educational, and self-assessment contexts, including for the evaluation and development of competence in post-graduate and professional settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 108492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124003598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Several tools exist to measure the physician-patient relationship; however few are specific to those with chronic physical health conditions, and none to date have been derived from the patient’s perspective. This research aimed to develop and validate a patient-informed tool for measuring the physician-patient relationship with patients who have a chronic physical health condition.

Methods

Study 1: An Australian sample of participants with a diagnosed chronic physical health condition and a self-reported good physician-patient relationship completed a three round Delphi poll to determine items of the chronic condition physician-patient relationship scale (CC-PPR). Fifty-two participants completed round one, 33 completed round two, and 24 completed all three rounds. Study 2: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted on a separate sample (N = 226) to explore the factor structure of the CC-PPR.

Results

The CC-PPR comprised 22 items within a single-factor structure which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.97) and sound convergent validity.

Discussion

The CC-PPR reliably measures observable, concrete, and specific physician behaviours that patients with chronic physical health conditions believe are critical in forming a good physician-patient relationship. The CC-PPR has potential application in research, educational, and self-assessment contexts, including for the evaluation and development of competence in post-graduate and professional settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性疾病医患关系量表(CC-PPR)的开发和验证:一种患者知情的测量工具
目的有多种测量医患关系的工具;然而,针对那些患有慢性身体健康状况的人的研究很少,迄今为止也没有一个是从病人的角度出发的。本研究旨在开发并验证一种患者知情的工具,用于测量患有慢性身体健康状况的患者的医患关系。方法研究1:对澳大利亚确诊慢性身体健康状况和自我报告良好医患关系的参与者进行三轮德尔菲民意调查,确定慢性疾病医患关系量表(CC-PPR)的项目。52名参与者完成了第一轮,33名完成了第二轮,24名完成了所有三轮。研究2:对单独样本(N = 226)进行探索性和验证性因子分析,探讨CC-PPR的因子结构。结果CC-PPR在单因素结构中包含22个条目,具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.97)和较好的收敛效度。CC-PPR可靠地测量了可观察到的、具体的和特定的医生行为,慢性身体健康状况患者认为这些行为对于形成良好的医患关系至关重要。CC-PPR在研究、教育和自我评估环境中具有潜在的应用,包括在研究生和专业环境中评估和发展能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Embedding an illustrator in the process of co-producing resources to enhance communication and shared decision-making for patients prescribed high-risk medication. Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Effective remediation for advanced practice providers with lowest patient experience: The power of relational resources. Relative importance of "why" and "how" messages on medication behavior: Insights from construal level theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1