Emma M Schopp, Leonore Okwara, Crystal Tichnell, Amy Turriff, Brittney Murray, Andreas S Barth, Hugh Calkins, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James
{"title":"Patient Perceptions of Emerging Gene Therapies for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Emma M Schopp, Leonore Okwara, Crystal Tichnell, Amy Turriff, Brittney Murray, Andreas S Barth, Hugh Calkins, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James","doi":"10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No disease-specific therapy currently exists for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), a progressive cardiogenetic condition conferring elevated risk for ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Emerging gene therapies have the potential to fill this gap. However, little is known about how adults with ARVC, or any other inherited cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia syndrome, appraise the risks and benefits of gene therapy research and which considerations may influence their decisions about clinical trial participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adults with clinically diagnosed and gene-positive ARVC participated in semistructured interviews that explored perceptions of gene therapy and hypothetical decision-making for gene therapy clinical trial participation. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed enthusiasm for gene therapy with varied levels of personal interest in trial participation. Although clinical severity appeared to be associated with an elevated interest in early trial participation, participants anticipated weighing both personal and trial-specific factors including life stage, trial stage, risks, benefits, participation burden, study leadership, and anticipated cost of future gene therapy. Adaptation to living with ARVC and involvement in the ARVC patient community were also relevant to decision-making about trial participation. Potential ethical concerns included unquestioning trust in clinical teams collaborating on industry-led trials and vulnerability of those recently diagnosed or with high perceived severity of ARVC symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several characteristics of the individual and trial warrant consideration during the informed consent process. Insights from this study may affect trial planning and communication with participants who have inherited cardiac conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10326,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e004759"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: No disease-specific therapy currently exists for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), a progressive cardiogenetic condition conferring elevated risk for ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Emerging gene therapies have the potential to fill this gap. However, little is known about how adults with ARVC, or any other inherited cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia syndrome, appraise the risks and benefits of gene therapy research and which considerations may influence their decisions about clinical trial participation.
Methods: Twenty adults with clinically diagnosed and gene-positive ARVC participated in semistructured interviews that explored perceptions of gene therapy and hypothetical decision-making for gene therapy clinical trial participation. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed.
Results: Participants expressed enthusiasm for gene therapy with varied levels of personal interest in trial participation. Although clinical severity appeared to be associated with an elevated interest in early trial participation, participants anticipated weighing both personal and trial-specific factors including life stage, trial stage, risks, benefits, participation burden, study leadership, and anticipated cost of future gene therapy. Adaptation to living with ARVC and involvement in the ARVC patient community were also relevant to decision-making about trial participation. Potential ethical concerns included unquestioning trust in clinical teams collaborating on industry-led trials and vulnerability of those recently diagnosed or with high perceived severity of ARVC symptoms.
Conclusions: Several characteristics of the individual and trial warrant consideration during the informed consent process. Insights from this study may affect trial planning and communication with participants who have inherited cardiac conditions.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine is a distinguished journal dedicated to advancing the frontiers of cardiovascular genomics and precision medicine. It publishes a diverse array of original research articles that delve into the genetic and molecular underpinnings of cardiovascular diseases. The journal's scope is broad, encompassing studies from human subjects to laboratory models, and from in vitro experiments to computational simulations.
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine is committed to publishing studies that have direct relevance to human cardiovascular biology and disease, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care and outcomes. The journal serves as a platform for researchers to share their groundbreaking work, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of cardiovascular genomics and precision medicine.