Application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL BioMedical Engineering OnLine Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12938-024-01303-2
Xiaoyun Wu, Suming Cao, Siyu Qin
{"title":"Application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.","authors":"Xiaoyun Wu, Suming Cao, Siyu Qin","doi":"10.1186/s12938-024-01303-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on the clinical data of 120 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in our hospital between December 2017 and May 2022 using convenience sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were differences in the impact of different management modes on blood glucose and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the two groups of patients (F<sub>blood glucose</sub> = 32.581, F<sub>VAS</sub> = 41.472, all P < 0.001). The average blood glucose levels in the traditional group were higher than those in the ERAS group at two time points, and the VAS scores in the former group were higher than those in the latter at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. The remifentanil dosage (49.89 ± 12.12 vs 57.84 ± 11.43 mL, t = - 2.475, P = 0.016), patient-controlled analgesia frequency (3.83 ± 2.23 vs 5.57 ± 3.52 times, t = - 2.481, P = 0.015) and analgesic supplementation frequency (0.57 ± 0.73 vs 1.07 ± 1.02 times, t = - 2.653, P = 0.010) in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the traditional group. Different management modes had different effects on the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in the two groups of patients (F<sub>PCT</sub> = 45.371, F<sub>IL-6</sub> = 43.466, F<sub>CRP</sub> = 51.364, F<sub>WBC</sub> = 65.674, all P < 0.001). The levels of PCT, IL-6, CRP and WBC in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group at three time points: postoperative day 1, 7 and 14. The postoperative hospital stay (8.41 ± 2.55 vs 11.61 ± 3.34 d, t = - 7.812, P < 0.001) and proportion of postoperative complications (9.61% vs 26.47%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.403, P = 0.020) in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of ERAS effectively reduces the perioperative stress response, shortens the postoperative length of hospital stay and lowers the overall incidence of postoperative complications in patients with hepatolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"23 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01303-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.

Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on the clinical data of 120 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in our hospital between December 2017 and May 2022 using convenience sampling.

Results: There were differences in the impact of different management modes on blood glucose and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the two groups of patients (Fblood glucose = 32.581, FVAS = 41.472, all P < 0.001). The average blood glucose levels in the traditional group were higher than those in the ERAS group at two time points, and the VAS scores in the former group were higher than those in the latter at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. The remifentanil dosage (49.89 ± 12.12 vs 57.84 ± 11.43 mL, t = - 2.475, P = 0.016), patient-controlled analgesia frequency (3.83 ± 2.23 vs 5.57 ± 3.52 times, t = - 2.481, P = 0.015) and analgesic supplementation frequency (0.57 ± 0.73 vs 1.07 ± 1.02 times, t = - 2.653, P = 0.010) in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the traditional group. Different management modes had different effects on the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in the two groups of patients (FPCT = 45.371, FIL-6 = 43.466, FCRP = 51.364, FWBC = 65.674, all P < 0.001). The levels of PCT, IL-6, CRP and WBC in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group at three time points: postoperative day 1, 7 and 14. The postoperative hospital stay (8.41 ± 2.55 vs 11.61 ± 3.34 d, t = - 7.812, P < 0.001) and proportion of postoperative complications (9.61% vs 26.47%, χ2 = 5.403, P = 0.020) in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group.

Conclusion: The application of ERAS effectively reduces the perioperative stress response, shortens the postoperative length of hospital stay and lowers the overall incidence of postoperative complications in patients with hepatolithiasis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强术后恢复在肝结石切除术患者中的应用效果。
目的:探讨ERAS在肝结石切除术患者中的应用效果。方法:采用方便抽样方法,对2017年12月至2022年5月我院肝胆外科收治的120例肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料进行回顾性比较分析。结果:两组患者不同管理方式对血糖及视觉模拟评分(VAS)的影响差异有统计学意义(Fblood glucose = 32.581, FVAS = 41.472,全P PCT = 45.371, fili -6 = 43.466, FCRP = 51.364, FWBC = 65.674,全P 2 = 5.403, P = 0.020), ERAS组低于传统组。结论:ERAS的应用有效降低了肝内胆管结石患者围手术期应激反应,缩短了术后住院时间,降低了术后并发症的总体发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
期刊最新文献
A model-based spectral directional approach reveals the long-term impact of COVID-19 on cardiorespiratory control and baroreflex. Deep learning-based algorithm for classifying high-resolution computed tomography features in coal workers' pneumoconiosis. Research progress in the regulation of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells using a micro-nanostructure. 4D printing: innovative solutions and technological advances in orthopedic repair and reconstruction, personalized treatment and drug delivery. The potential of MRI radiomics based on extrapulmonary metastases in predicting EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1