End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2023-004673
Andre Bedendo, Andrew Papworth, Bryony Beresford, Bob Phillips, Chakrapani Vasudevan, Gabriella Lake Walker, Helen Weatherly, Richard Feltbower, Sebastian Hinde, Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt, Fliss Murtagh, Jane Noyes, Julia Hackett, Richard Hain, Sam Oddie, Gayathri Subramanian, Andrew Haynes, Lorna Fraser
{"title":"End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.","authors":"Andre Bedendo, Andrew Papworth, Bryony Beresford, Bob Phillips, Chakrapani Vasudevan, Gabriella Lake Walker, Helen Weatherly, Richard Feltbower, Sebastian Hinde, Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt, Fliss Murtagh, Jane Noyes, Julia Hackett, Richard Hain, Sam Oddie, Gayathri Subramanian, Andrew Haynes, Lorna Fraser","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe end of life care in settings where, in the UK, most children die; to explore commonalities and differences within and between settings; and to test whether there are distinct, alternative models of end of life care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of UK neonatal units (NNUs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and children/young people's cancer principal treatment centres (PTCs) collected data on aspects of service organisation, delivery and practice relevant to end of life outcomes or experiences (referred to as the core elements of end of life care) across three domains: care of the child, care of the parent and bereavement care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>91 units/centres returned a survey (37% response rate). There was variation within and between settings in terms of whether and how core elements of end of life care were provided. PTCs were more likely than NNUs and PICUs to have palliative care expertise strongly embedded in the multidisciplinary team (MDT), and to have the widest range of clinical and non-clinical professions represented in the MDT. However, bereavement care was more limited. Many settings were limited in the practical and psychosocial-spiritual care and support available to parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children at end of life, and families, experience differences in care that evidence indicates matter to them and impact outcomes. Some differences appear to be related to the type of setting. Subsequent stages of this research (the ENHANCE study) will investigate the relative contribution of these core elements of end of life care to child/parent outcomes and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe end of life care in settings where, in the UK, most children die; to explore commonalities and differences within and between settings; and to test whether there are distinct, alternative models of end of life care.

Methods: An online survey of UK neonatal units (NNUs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and children/young people's cancer principal treatment centres (PTCs) collected data on aspects of service organisation, delivery and practice relevant to end of life outcomes or experiences (referred to as the core elements of end of life care) across three domains: care of the child, care of the parent and bereavement care.

Results: 91 units/centres returned a survey (37% response rate). There was variation within and between settings in terms of whether and how core elements of end of life care were provided. PTCs were more likely than NNUs and PICUs to have palliative care expertise strongly embedded in the multidisciplinary team (MDT), and to have the widest range of clinical and non-clinical professions represented in the MDT. However, bereavement care was more limited. Many settings were limited in the practical and psychosocial-spiritual care and support available to parents.

Conclusions: Children at end of life, and families, experience differences in care that evidence indicates matter to them and impact outcomes. Some differences appear to be related to the type of setting. Subsequent stages of this research (the ENHANCE study) will investigate the relative contribution of these core elements of end of life care to child/parent outcomes and experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科临终关怀:英国全国调查。
目的:描述在英国,大多数儿童死亡的环境中的临终关怀;探索环境内部和环境之间的共性和差异;并测试是否有不同的,可替代的临终关怀模式。方法:对英国新生儿单位(NNUs)、儿科重症监护单位(picu)和儿童/青少年癌症主要治疗中心(ptc)进行在线调查,收集了有关服务组织、交付和实践方面的数据,这些数据与生命终结的结果或经历有关(被称为生命终结护理的核心要素),涉及三个领域:儿童护理、父母护理和丧亲护理。结果:91个单位/中心回复了调查(37%的回复率)。在是否以及如何提供临终关怀的核心要素方面,设置内部和设置之间存在差异。与NNUs和picu相比,ptc更有可能在多学科团队(MDT)中拥有强有力的姑息治疗专业知识,并且在MDT中拥有最广泛的临床和非临床专业。然而,丧亲关怀更为有限。在许多情况下,父母所能得到的实际和心理-精神关怀和支持是有限的。结论:有证据表明,临终儿童及其家庭在护理方面存在差异,这对他们很重要,并会影响结果。有些差异似乎与环境类型有关。本研究的后续阶段(ENHANCE研究)将调查这些临终关怀的核心要素对儿童/父母的结果和经历的相对贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Crisis pack prescribing in terminal haemorrhage: a national survey of specialist palliative medicine physicians. Divergence in DNACPR and resuscitation policies: institutional survey in England. End-of-life care in a major UK trauma centre. Palliative care utilisation globally by cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiac dysfunction in solid tumours: scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1