Screening for cognitive symptoms in dialysis patients with an extended version of Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF): a validation study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BMC Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03848-9
Frederick H F Chan, Pearl Sim, Phoebe X H Lim, Behram A Khan, Jason C J Choo, Konstadina Griva
{"title":"Screening for cognitive symptoms in dialysis patients with an extended version of Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF): a validation study.","authors":"Frederick H F Chan, Pearl Sim, Phoebe X H Lim, Behram A Khan, Jason C J Choo, Konstadina Griva","doi":"10.1186/s12882-024-03848-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints are highly prevalent in haemodialysis patients and are associated with adverse health outcomes. Currently, there is no established guideline on cognitive screening in this population. Although neuropsychological tests are the gold standard measure of cognition, they are time-consuming and require trained personnel. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF), a self-administered questionnaire with only three items, may be a feasible alternative for busy renal settings. In this study, we validated an extended version of KDQOL-CF by including an additional memory item (i.e., \"How much of the time during the past four weeks did you have memory difficulties?\") to improve its ability to capture memory impairments that are common in dialysis patients but missing in the original scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 268 haemodialysis patients treated in 10 dialysis centres in Singapore completed the extended KDQOL-CF and gold standard measures of objective cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and subjective cognition (Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory). Patients also self-reported their functional impairment and treatment nonadherence. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the extended KDQOL-CF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine the diagnostic ability of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments and subjective cognitive complaints. Additionally, we examined associations between the extended KDQOL-CF and patients' self-reported functional impairment and treatment nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extended KDQOL-CF can be explained by a one-factor model and has good internal consistency and convergent validity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis provided support for the diagnostic accuracy of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments (area under curve = 60.9%) and subjective cognitive complaints (area under curve = 76.2%). The extended KDQOL-CF also performed better than the original KDQOL-CF in predicting functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in the recruited patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extended KDQOL-CF may be used as a first-step cognitive screening tool in dialysis settings to offer a gateway for further diagnostic evaluation and preventive or rehabilitative programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"25 1","pages":"434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03848-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints are highly prevalent in haemodialysis patients and are associated with adverse health outcomes. Currently, there is no established guideline on cognitive screening in this population. Although neuropsychological tests are the gold standard measure of cognition, they are time-consuming and require trained personnel. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF), a self-administered questionnaire with only three items, may be a feasible alternative for busy renal settings. In this study, we validated an extended version of KDQOL-CF by including an additional memory item (i.e., "How much of the time during the past four weeks did you have memory difficulties?") to improve its ability to capture memory impairments that are common in dialysis patients but missing in the original scale.

Methods: A total of 268 haemodialysis patients treated in 10 dialysis centres in Singapore completed the extended KDQOL-CF and gold standard measures of objective cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and subjective cognition (Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory). Patients also self-reported their functional impairment and treatment nonadherence. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the extended KDQOL-CF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine the diagnostic ability of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments and subjective cognitive complaints. Additionally, we examined associations between the extended KDQOL-CF and patients' self-reported functional impairment and treatment nonadherence.

Results: The extended KDQOL-CF can be explained by a one-factor model and has good internal consistency and convergent validity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis provided support for the diagnostic accuracy of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments (area under curve = 60.9%) and subjective cognitive complaints (area under curve = 76.2%). The extended KDQOL-CF also performed better than the original KDQOL-CF in predicting functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in the recruited patients.

Conclusions: The extended KDQOL-CF may be used as a first-step cognitive screening tool in dialysis settings to offer a gateway for further diagnostic evaluation and preventive or rehabilitative programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用扩展版肾病生活质量认知功能量表(KDQOL-CF)筛查透析患者的认知症状:一项验证研究
背景:认知障碍和认知主诉在血液透析患者中非常普遍,并与不良健康结局相关。目前,在这一人群中没有关于认知筛查的既定指南。虽然神经心理学测试是衡量认知的黄金标准,但它们既耗时又需要训练有素的人员。肾脏疾病生活质量认知功能量表(KDQOL-CF)是一份只有三个项目的自我管理问卷,可能是繁忙肾脏设置的可行替代方案。在本研究中,我们验证了KDQOL-CF的扩展版本,通过增加一个额外的记忆项目(即,“在过去四周中,你有多少时间有记忆困难?”)来提高其捕捉透析患者中常见但在原始量表中缺失的记忆障碍的能力。方法:在新加坡10个透析中心接受治疗的268名血液透析患者完成了扩展的KDQOL-CF和客观认知(蒙特利尔认知评估)和主观认知(患者自我功能量表评估)的金标准测量。患者还自我报告了他们的功能损害和治疗不依从。通过统计分析确定扩充版KDQOL-CF的因素结构和心理测量学性质。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,以确定扩展KDQOL-CF在识别客观认知障碍和主观认知主诉方面的诊断能力。此外,我们检查了延长的KDQOL-CF与患者自我报告的功能障碍和治疗不依从之间的关系。结果:扩展后的KDQOL-CF可以用单因素模型解释,具有良好的内部一致性和收敛效度。受试者工作特征曲线分析支持扩展KDQOL-CF对客观认知障碍(曲线下面积= 60.9%)和主观认知疾患(曲线下面积= 76.2%)的诊断准确性。扩展的KDQOL-CF在预测招募患者的功能损害和治疗不依从性方面也优于原始的KDQOL-CF。结论:扩展的KDQOL-CF可作为透析设置的第一步认知筛查工具,为进一步诊断评估和预防或康复计划提供门户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
A two-person collaborative repositioning approach for high peritoneal dialysis catheter migration: case reports and literature review. Exploration of rituximab treatment strategies for membranous nephropathy adapted to the Chinese healthcare environment. Employment before and after initiation of dialysis or kidney transplantation- a Danish nationwide registry-based cohort study. Enhancing individual glomerular filtration rate assessment: can we trust the equation? Development and validation of machine learning models to assess the trustworthiness of estimated GFR compared to measured GFR. Hyperuricemia prevalence and its risk factors in uremic patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1