Progression to diabetes and regression to normoglycemia in pre-diabetic subjects: results from a pragmatic community trial in a middle-income country.

IF 1.8 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40200-023-01370-7
Davood Khalili, Zohreh Dehghani, Samaneh Asgari, Farzad Hadaegh, Fereidoun Azizi
{"title":"Progression to diabetes and regression to normoglycemia in pre-diabetic subjects: results from a pragmatic community trial in a middle-income country.","authors":"Davood Khalili, Zohreh Dehghani, Samaneh Asgari, Farzad Hadaegh, Fereidoun Azizi","doi":"10.1007/s40200-023-01370-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The incidence of prediabetes has been on the rise, indicating a growing public health concern, as individuals with prediabetes are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine the effects of simple interventions on the regression of pre-diabetes status into normoglycemia and also prevent progression to diabetes in a pragmatic community trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2073 (761 intervention; 1,312 controls) participants with pre-diabetes were included in the present secondary data analysis; cases with diabetes or normoglycemia were identified during nine years of follow-up. We utilized multinomial logistic regression to calculate relative risk reductions (RRR, 95% CIs) for educational interventions targeting lifestyle changes in both men and women. Additionally, we employed a linear regression model that considered the ordinal outcomes ranging from normal to prediabetes and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In men, after adjusting for confounders, the intervention group had a 53% (95% CI = 1.11-2.10) more significant chance of returning to normoglycemia than the control group after three years of follow-up. In addition, men in the intervention group also had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes than men in the control group (RRR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02-2.31) after three years of follow-up. These findings among men remained consistent even after a six-year follow-up period. In women, after adjusting for age, the chance of returning to normoglycemia after three years in the intervention group was 1.30 times higher than in women in the control group (95% CI = 1.00-1.69), which disappeared after adjusting for other covariates or after six years of follow-up. The results of the regression analysis showed that the intervention had no effect on changing the status of the outcome from normal to prediabetes and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could not demonstrate any effect of a simple intervention in improving prediabetes. This high-risk population may require more gender-specific intensive interventions and attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","volume":"23 2","pages":"1863-1870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-023-01370-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of prediabetes has been on the rise, indicating a growing public health concern, as individuals with prediabetes are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine the effects of simple interventions on the regression of pre-diabetes status into normoglycemia and also prevent progression to diabetes in a pragmatic community trial.

Methods: A total of 2073 (761 intervention; 1,312 controls) participants with pre-diabetes were included in the present secondary data analysis; cases with diabetes or normoglycemia were identified during nine years of follow-up. We utilized multinomial logistic regression to calculate relative risk reductions (RRR, 95% CIs) for educational interventions targeting lifestyle changes in both men and women. Additionally, we employed a linear regression model that considered the ordinal outcomes ranging from normal to prediabetes and diabetes.

Results: In men, after adjusting for confounders, the intervention group had a 53% (95% CI = 1.11-2.10) more significant chance of returning to normoglycemia than the control group after three years of follow-up. In addition, men in the intervention group also had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes than men in the control group (RRR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02-2.31) after three years of follow-up. These findings among men remained consistent even after a six-year follow-up period. In women, after adjusting for age, the chance of returning to normoglycemia after three years in the intervention group was 1.30 times higher than in women in the control group (95% CI = 1.00-1.69), which disappeared after adjusting for other covariates or after six years of follow-up. The results of the regression analysis showed that the intervention had no effect on changing the status of the outcome from normal to prediabetes and diabetes.

Conclusion: We could not demonstrate any effect of a simple intervention in improving prediabetes. This high-risk population may require more gender-specific intensive interventions and attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病前期受试者进展为糖尿病并恢复到正常血糖:来自中等收入国家的一项实用社区试验的结果
目的:前驱糖尿病的发病率一直在上升,这表明越来越多的公共卫生问题,因为前驱糖尿病患者发展为2型糖尿病的风险更高。本研究旨在通过一项实用的社区试验,确定简单干预措施对糖尿病前期状态回归到正常血糖水平的影响,并防止糖尿病进展。方法:共2073例(干预761例;本次二级数据分析纳入1312名糖尿病前期受试者(对照组);在9年的随访中确定了糖尿病或血糖正常的病例。我们使用多项逻辑回归来计算针对男性和女性生活方式改变的教育干预的相对风险降低(RRR, 95% ci)。此外,我们采用线性回归模型,考虑了从正常到糖尿病前期和糖尿病的有序结果。结果:在男性中,在调整混杂因素后,经过三年的随访,干预组恢复正常血糖的机会比对照组高53% (95% CI = 1.11-2.10)。此外,经过三年的随访,干预组男性患2型糖尿病的风险也高于对照组男性(RRR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02-2.31)。即使在六年的随访期之后,男性的这些发现仍然保持一致。在女性中,在调整年龄后,干预组三年后恢复到正常血糖的机会是对照组女性的1.30倍(95% CI = 1.00-1.69),在调整其他协变量或随访6年后,这种情况消失。回归分析结果显示,干预对改变预后从正常到糖尿病前期和糖尿病的状态没有影响。结论:我们不能证明简单的干预对改善前驱糖尿病有任何效果。这些高危人群可能需要更多针对不同性别的密集干预和关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders is a peer reviewed journal which publishes original clinical and translational articles and reviews in the field of endocrinology and provides a forum of debate of the highest quality on these issues. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, diabetes, lipid disorders, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, interdisciplinary practices in endocrinology, cardiovascular and metabolic risk, aging research, obesity, traditional medicine, pychosomatic research, behavioral medicine, ethics and evidence-based practices.As of Jan 2018 the journal is published by Springer as a hybrid journal with no article processing charges. All articles published before 2018 are available free of charge on springerlink.Unofficial 2017 2-year Impact Factor: 1.816.
期刊最新文献
Improving outcomes with early and intensive metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a long-term modeling analysis of clinical and cost outcomes in Italy. Lipoic acid improves wound healing through its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects in a diabetic mouse model. Mechanistic insights on lycopene usage against diabetes and associated complications. Integrative proteomic analysis reveals the potential diagnostic marker and drug target for the Type-2 diabetes mellitus. Predictive performance of noninvasive factors for liver fibrosis in severe obesity: a screening based on machine learning models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1