Healthcare utilization and costs following molecular diagnostic testing among patients with vaginitis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of comparative effectiveness research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0173
Azia Evans, Riddhi Doshi, Jason Yeaw, Katharine Coyle, Steven Goldberg, Elizabeth Wang, Maren S Fragala, Jairus Reddy
{"title":"Healthcare utilization and costs following molecular diagnostic testing among patients with vaginitis.","authors":"Azia Evans, Riddhi Doshi, Jason Yeaw, Katharine Coyle, Steven Goldberg, Elizabeth Wang, Maren S Fragala, Jairus Reddy","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Vaginitis and other vaginal discharge syndromes lead to high healthcare utilization. Molecular tests like syndromic multiplex real-time (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests are highly sensitive and specific at diagnosing the infectious causes of vaginitis. This study compared the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct all-cause healthcare costs among patients with vaginitis in the US receiving next-day syndromic multiplex RT-PCR tests with those receiving other PCR tests or no diagnostic test of interest. <b>Patients & methods:</b> This retrospective study utilized claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus database to identify adult patients with a diagnosis for vaginitis (first claim = index) from January 2021 to April 2023, with 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Pairwise comparisons were conducted between RT-PCR and 1:1 propensity matched Other PCR and No Test subcohorts for all-cause HCRU and costs during follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Each of the RT-PCR, Other PCR and No Test subcohorts included 1946 matched patients. Mean(SD) follow-up total cost was significantly lower for the RT-PCR than the No Test subcohort ($5607 [$15,122] vs $6680 [$20,751], p = 0.0023). Mean(SD) overall outpatient and other medical service costs were lower for RT-PCR versus Other PCR (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $3174 [$7113], p = 0.0110; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2099 [$6475], p = 0.0002) and No Test subcohorts (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $4067 [$12,341], p < 0.0001; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2973 [$11,685]; p < 0.0001). A lower proportion had any outpatient service HCRU in RT-PCR versus Other PCR subcohort (92.6% vs 94.2%, p = 0.0349). A lower proportion had any other medical service claim in RT-PCR versus Other PCR (78.3% vs 83.2%, p < 0.0001) and No Test subcohorts (78.3% vs 83.0%, p = 0.0001). Physician office, emergency room (ER), prescription use and costs were similar between the subcohorts. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics with next day test results in patients with vaginitis was associated with lower outpatient costs and total healthcare costs than those in the no test cohort over 6 months. These findings indicate that use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics may contribute to improved patient management compared with clinical diagnosis alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Vaginitis and other vaginal discharge syndromes lead to high healthcare utilization. Molecular tests like syndromic multiplex real-time (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests are highly sensitive and specific at diagnosing the infectious causes of vaginitis. This study compared the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct all-cause healthcare costs among patients with vaginitis in the US receiving next-day syndromic multiplex RT-PCR tests with those receiving other PCR tests or no diagnostic test of interest. Patients & methods: This retrospective study utilized claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database to identify adult patients with a diagnosis for vaginitis (first claim = index) from January 2021 to April 2023, with 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Pairwise comparisons were conducted between RT-PCR and 1:1 propensity matched Other PCR and No Test subcohorts for all-cause HCRU and costs during follow-up. Results: Each of the RT-PCR, Other PCR and No Test subcohorts included 1946 matched patients. Mean(SD) follow-up total cost was significantly lower for the RT-PCR than the No Test subcohort ($5607 [$15,122] vs $6680 [$20,751], p = 0.0023). Mean(SD) overall outpatient and other medical service costs were lower for RT-PCR versus Other PCR (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $3174 [$7113], p = 0.0110; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2099 [$6475], p = 0.0002) and No Test subcohorts (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $4067 [$12,341], p < 0.0001; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2973 [$11,685]; p < 0.0001). A lower proportion had any outpatient service HCRU in RT-PCR versus Other PCR subcohort (92.6% vs 94.2%, p = 0.0349). A lower proportion had any other medical service claim in RT-PCR versus Other PCR (78.3% vs 83.2%, p < 0.0001) and No Test subcohorts (78.3% vs 83.0%, p = 0.0001). Physician office, emergency room (ER), prescription use and costs were similar between the subcohorts. Conclusion: The use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics with next day test results in patients with vaginitis was associated with lower outpatient costs and total healthcare costs than those in the no test cohort over 6 months. These findings indicate that use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics may contribute to improved patient management compared with clinical diagnosis alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道炎患者进行分子诊断检测后的医疗利用率和成本。
目的:阴道炎和其他阴道分泌物综合征导致较高的医疗利用率。基于综合征多重实时(RT)聚合酶链反应(PCR)的分子检测在诊断阴道炎的感染性原因方面具有高度的敏感性和特异性。本研究比较了美国接受第二天综合征多重RT-PCR检测的阴道炎患者与接受其他PCR检测或未进行感兴趣的诊断检测的阴道炎患者的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和直接全因医疗成本。患者和方法:本回顾性研究利用IQVIA PharMetrics®Plus数据库的索赔数据,确定2021年1月至2023年4月诊断为阴道炎的成年患者(首次索赔=指数),在指数之前(基线)和之后(随访)连续入组6个月。在随访期间,对全因HCRU和费用进行了RT-PCR与1:1倾向匹配的其他PCR和No Test亚群的两两比较。结果:每个RT-PCR、Other PCR和No Test亚队列包括1946例匹配的患者。RT-PCR的平均(SD)随访总成本显著低于No Test亚队列(5607美元[15,122美元]vs 6680美元[20,751美元],p = 0.0023)。与其他PCR相比,RT-PCR的平均(SD)门诊和其他医疗服务总费用更低(门诊:2964美元[9666美元]对3174美元[7113美元],p = 0.0110;其他医疗:1961美元[9244美元]对2099美元[6475美元],p = 0.0002)和无检测亚队列(门诊:2964美元[9666美元]对4067美元[12,341美元],p结论:在6个月以上无检测队列中,阴道炎患者使用综合征多重RT-PCR诊断次日检测结果的门诊费用和总医疗费用较低。这些发现表明,与单独的临床诊断相比,使用综合征多重RT-PCR诊断可能有助于改善患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Access in all areas? A roundup of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 6. Economic impact of reduced postoperative visits after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Efficacy of treatment options for complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Selumetinib for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas that can't be removed by surgery, and impact on how the condition affects caregivers: a plain language summary. Budget impact analyses of hemoglobin A1c and lipid panel point-of-care testing with Afinion™ 2 in Canada and Italy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1