Resistance exercise has an antihypertensive effect comparable to that of aerobic exercise in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Research Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1038/s41440-024-01998-9
Hidetaka Morita, Makiko Abe, Yasunori Suematsu, Yoshinari Uehara, Rie Koyoshi, Kanta Fujimi, Akihito Ideishi, Kohei Takata, Yuta Kato, Tetsuo Hirata, Eiji Yahiro, Natsumi Morito, Ken Kitajima, Atsushi Satoh, Chikara Yoshimura, Shintaro Ishida, Shota Okutsu, Koji Takahashi, Yukiko Shinohara, Takashi Sakaguchi, Shiori Katsuki, Kazuhiro Tada, Takako Fujii, Shunsuke Funakoshi, Yaopeng Hu, Tomonori Satoh, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Keisuke Okamura, Hiroyuki Mizuno, Kimika Arakawa, Kei Asayama, Toshio Ohtsubo, Tomoaki Ishigami, Shigeru Shibata, Takayuki Fujita, Masanori Munakata, Mitsuru Ohishi, Atsuhiro Ichihara, Tomohiro Katsuya, Masashi Mukoyama, Hiromi Rakugi, Koichi Node, Hisatomi Arima, Shin-ichiro Miura
{"title":"Resistance exercise has an antihypertensive effect comparable to that of aerobic exercise in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Hidetaka Morita, Makiko Abe, Yasunori Suematsu, Yoshinari Uehara, Rie Koyoshi, Kanta Fujimi, Akihito Ideishi, Kohei Takata, Yuta Kato, Tetsuo Hirata, Eiji Yahiro, Natsumi Morito, Ken Kitajima, Atsushi Satoh, Chikara Yoshimura, Shintaro Ishida, Shota Okutsu, Koji Takahashi, Yukiko Shinohara, Takashi Sakaguchi, Shiori Katsuki, Kazuhiro Tada, Takako Fujii, Shunsuke Funakoshi, Yaopeng Hu, Tomonori Satoh, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Keisuke Okamura, Hiroyuki Mizuno, Kimika Arakawa, Kei Asayama, Toshio Ohtsubo, Tomoaki Ishigami, Shigeru Shibata, Takayuki Fujita, Masanori Munakata, Mitsuru Ohishi, Atsuhiro Ichihara, Tomohiro Katsuya, Masashi Mukoyama, Hiromi Rakugi, Koichi Node, Hisatomi Arima, Shin-ichiro Miura","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01998-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypertension increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease and death. In addition to aerobic exercise, which is currently recommended for its antihypertensive effects, recent studies have suggested that dynamic and isometric resistance exercises also have antihypertensive effects. However, the magnitude of the antihypertensive effect of such resistance exercises is not well known. To clarify the differences in these effects, we conducted an umbrella review of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was performed on the Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, covering the period from inception to August 1, 2023. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing the effects of exercise and non-exercise on office, home, or ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients aged 18 years or older. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect size across multiple studies. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by the type of exercise (aerobic exercise, dynamic resistance exercise, isometric resistance exercise, and combined exercise). Eighty-four RCTs with 5065 hypertensive patients were included in the study. All exercise significantly reduced systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared to non-exercise (SBP:−7.52 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −8.77 to −6.27, p < 0.001; DBP: −4.36 mmHg, 95% CI − 5.15 to −3.57, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the reduction in BP between the types of exercise (p for interaction = 0.815 for SBP, p = 0.417 for DBP). These data from 84 RCTs showed that exercise intervention significantly reduced BP and that resistance exercise has a similar antihypertensive effect to aerobic exercise in hypertensive patients. These authors contributed equally to this work:","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":"48 2","pages":"733-743"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41440-024-01998-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease and death. In addition to aerobic exercise, which is currently recommended for its antihypertensive effects, recent studies have suggested that dynamic and isometric resistance exercises also have antihypertensive effects. However, the magnitude of the antihypertensive effect of such resistance exercises is not well known. To clarify the differences in these effects, we conducted an umbrella review of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was performed on the Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, covering the period from inception to August 1, 2023. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing the effects of exercise and non-exercise on office, home, or ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients aged 18 years or older. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect size across multiple studies. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by the type of exercise (aerobic exercise, dynamic resistance exercise, isometric resistance exercise, and combined exercise). Eighty-four RCTs with 5065 hypertensive patients were included in the study. All exercise significantly reduced systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared to non-exercise (SBP:−7.52 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −8.77 to −6.27, p < 0.001; DBP: −4.36 mmHg, 95% CI − 5.15 to −3.57, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the reduction in BP between the types of exercise (p for interaction = 0.815 for SBP, p = 0.417 for DBP). These data from 84 RCTs showed that exercise intervention significantly reduced BP and that resistance exercise has a similar antihypertensive effect to aerobic exercise in hypertensive patients. These authors contributed equally to this work:

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗阻运动对高血压患者的降压效果与有氧运动相当:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
高血压会增加患脑血管疾病和死亡的风险。除了有氧运动,这是目前推荐的降压作用,最近的研究表明,动态和等长阻力运动也有降压作用。然而,这种抗压运动的降压效果的大小并不为人所知。为了澄清这些影响的差异,我们对随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析进行了综述。在Ovid MEDLINE和Cochrane Library进行系统检索,涵盖从成立到2023年8月1日的时间。符合条件的研究是比较运动和非运动对18岁或以上高血压患者办公室、家庭或动态血压(BP)影响的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,估计多个研究的效应大小。子分析根据运动类型(有氧运动、动态阻力运动、等长阻力运动和联合运动)确定结果。84项随机对照试验共纳入5065例高血压患者。与非运动相比,所有运动均显著降低收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP) (SBP:-7.52 mmHg, 95%置信区间[CI] -8.77至-6.27,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
期刊最新文献
Combination of medical therapy and percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty versus medical therapy alone for patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Renal nerves and hypertension contribute to impaired proximal tubule megalin-mediated albumin uptake in renovascular hypertensive rats. Mean arterial pressure differences between cuff oscillometric and invasive blood pressure. Speculating suitability of partial adrenalectomy for lateralized primary aldosteronism: With emphasis on partial and complete success as optimistic outcomes. The significance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for evaluating circadian blood pressure variations affected by alcohol consumption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1