No Difference in Perioperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Resection Between Flagship and Non-Flagship Hospitals in New York State.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1002/jso.27949
Joseph C L'Huillier, Joseph D Boccardo, Miranda Berkebile, John M Woodward, Jessica L Martinolich, Katia Noyes, Nader D Nader, Csaba Gajdos
{"title":"No Difference in Perioperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Resection Between Flagship and Non-Flagship Hospitals in New York State.","authors":"Joseph C L'Huillier, Joseph D Boccardo, Miranda Berkebile, John M Woodward, Jessica L Martinolich, Katia Noyes, Nader D Nader, Csaba Gajdos","doi":"10.1002/jso.27949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals are rapidly consolidating to create large healthcare systems. Whether outcomes following colorectal cancer resection at flagship hospitals differ from those at non-flagship hospitals is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 6-year retrospective analysis of an all-payor New York State (NYS) hospital database was conducted. All adult patients with a colorectal resection for primary resectable colorectal cancer were included. Within each system, the hospital with the most colorectal resections was designated the \"flagship\" hospital. Thirty-day outcomes at flagship facilities were compared to affiliated, non-flagship hospitals following colorectal resection while matching for patient-level differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 400 patients were included across 31 healthcare systems in NYS. There were no differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 1.1%), 30-day readmissions (10.5% vs. 11.9%), or postoperative outcomes between matched patients treated at flagship versus non-flagship facilities (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are no differences in perioperative outcomes between flagship and non-flagship hospitals in a given system in NYS. Patients with resectable non-metastatic colorectal cancer may not need to undergo oncologic resection at flagship hospitals to receive high-quality perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitals are rapidly consolidating to create large healthcare systems. Whether outcomes following colorectal cancer resection at flagship hospitals differ from those at non-flagship hospitals is unknown.

Methods: A 6-year retrospective analysis of an all-payor New York State (NYS) hospital database was conducted. All adult patients with a colorectal resection for primary resectable colorectal cancer were included. Within each system, the hospital with the most colorectal resections was designated the "flagship" hospital. Thirty-day outcomes at flagship facilities were compared to affiliated, non-flagship hospitals following colorectal resection while matching for patient-level differences.

Results: In total, 28 400 patients were included across 31 healthcare systems in NYS. There were no differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 1.1%), 30-day readmissions (10.5% vs. 11.9%), or postoperative outcomes between matched patients treated at flagship versus non-flagship facilities (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: There are no differences in perioperative outcomes between flagship and non-flagship hospitals in a given system in NYS. Patients with resectable non-metastatic colorectal cancer may not need to undergo oncologic resection at flagship hospitals to receive high-quality perioperative care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约州旗舰医院与非旗舰医院结直肠癌切除术围手术期预后无差异
背景:医院正在迅速整合,以创建大型医疗保健系统。旗舰医院结直肠癌切除术的预后是否与非旗舰医院不同尚不清楚。方法:对全付费纽约州(NYS)医院数据库进行6年回顾性分析。所有因原发性可切除结直肠癌而行结直肠切除术的成年患者均被纳入研究。在每个系统中,结肠直肠切除最多的医院被指定为“旗舰”医院。将旗舰医院与附属非旗舰医院结肠直肠癌切除术后的30天结果进行比较,同时匹配患者水平差异。结果:总共有28400名患者被纳入纽约州31个医疗保健系统。在旗舰医院和非旗舰医院治疗的匹配患者在死亡率(0.9% vs. 1.1%)、30天再入院率(10.5% vs. 11.9%)或术后结局方面没有差异(p < 0.05)。结论:在纽约州的指定系统中,旗舰医院和非旗舰医院的围手术期结局没有差异。可切除的非转移性结直肠癌患者可能不需要在旗舰医院接受肿瘤切除以获得高质量的围手术期护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1