Delirium assessment, management and barriers to effective care across Scotland: A secondary analysis of survey data from World Delirium Awareness Day 2023.

IF 0.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1177/14782715241301486
Fariha Naeem, Rose S Penfold, Roy L Soiza, Rebecca Von Haken, Heidi Lindroth, Keibun Liu, Peter Nydhal, Terry J Quinn
{"title":"Delirium assessment, management and barriers to effective care across Scotland: A secondary analysis of survey data from World Delirium Awareness Day 2023.","authors":"Fariha Naeem, Rose S Penfold, Roy L Soiza, Rebecca Von Haken, Heidi Lindroth, Keibun Liu, Peter Nydhal, Terry J Quinn","doi":"10.1177/14782715241301486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is a common, severe neuropsychiatric syndrome in hospitalised older adults. We evaluated use of validated delirium assessment tools, adherence to national guidelines and prevalence and management of delirium across Scotland, identifying barriers to effective care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of national survey data, collected by participating clinicians on World Delirium Awareness Day (15 March 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 120 responses (3,257 patients), the 4AT was the most frequently used assessment tool (75%), while 14% of units reported using clinical judgement alone. The delirium assessment rate was 74%, with a prevalence of 22% at 8 am. Management protocols varied, with frequent routine non-pharmacological interventions including pain management (88%), hydration (87%) and open family visiting (80%). Barriers to delirium care included insufficient staffing and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While many hospital settings follow national delirium guidelines, some still rely on clinical judgement for assessment, with variability in management protocols and practices. We have highlighted key barriers to effective delirium care in Scotland.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715241301486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delirium is a common, severe neuropsychiatric syndrome in hospitalised older adults. We evaluated use of validated delirium assessment tools, adherence to national guidelines and prevalence and management of delirium across Scotland, identifying barriers to effective care.

Methods: Secondary analysis of national survey data, collected by participating clinicians on World Delirium Awareness Day (15 March 2023).

Results: Among 120 responses (3,257 patients), the 4AT was the most frequently used assessment tool (75%), while 14% of units reported using clinical judgement alone. The delirium assessment rate was 74%, with a prevalence of 22% at 8 am. Management protocols varied, with frequent routine non-pharmacological interventions including pain management (88%), hydration (87%) and open family visiting (80%). Barriers to delirium care included insufficient staffing and training.

Conclusion: While many hospital settings follow national delirium guidelines, some still rely on clinical judgement for assessment, with variability in management protocols and practices. We have highlighted key barriers to effective delirium care in Scotland.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰全境谵妄评估、管理和有效护理障碍:对2023年世界谵妄意识日调查数据的二次分析
谵妄是住院老年人常见的严重神经精神综合征。我们评估了经过验证的谵妄评估工具的使用情况,对国家指南的遵守情况以及苏格兰谵妄的患病率和管理情况,确定了有效护理的障碍。方法:对参与研究的临床医生在世界谵妄意识日(2023年3月15日)收集的全国调查数据进行二次分析。结果:在120例应答(3257例患者)中,4AT是最常用的评估工具(75%),而14%的单位报告单独使用临床判断。谵妄评估率为74%,上午8时患病率为22%。管理方案各不相同,常规的非药物干预包括疼痛管理(88%)、水合作用(87%)和开放的家庭拜访(80%)。谵妄护理的障碍包括人员配备和培训不足。结论:虽然许多医院设置遵循国家谵妄指南,但有些医院仍依赖临床判断进行评估,管理方案和实践存在差异。我们强调了在苏格兰有效的谵妄护理的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
期刊最新文献
Clinical lead in medicine and co-lead at Medical School: Reflections from transitioning through the RCP Chief Registrar programme within the NHS. Dealing with manuscript rejections in academic medicine: It takes two hands to clap. 'Primum non nocere' - The old lie? Realigning history: The Toronto Four insulin discovery team. Development and preliminary validation of a cognitive-physical frailty index in an older adult cohort: The NEDICES study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1