The impact of AI on education and careers: What do students think?

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1457299
Sarah R Thomson, Beverley Ann Pickard-Jones, Stephanie Baines, Pauldy C J Otermans
{"title":"The impact of AI on education and careers: What do students think?","authors":"Sarah R Thomson, Beverley Ann Pickard-Jones, Stephanie Baines, Pauldy C J Otermans","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1457299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Providing one-on-one support to large cohorts is challenging, yet emerging AI technologies show promise in bridging the gap between the support students want and what educators can provide. They offer students a way to engage with their course material in a way that feels fluent and instinctive. Whilst educators may have views on the appropriates for AI, the tools themselves, as well as the novel ways in which they can be used, are continually changing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to probe students' familiarity with AI tools, their views on its current uses, their understanding of universities' AI policies, and finally their impressions of its importance, both to their degree and their future careers. We surveyed 453 psychology and sport science students across two institutions in the UK, predominantly those in the first and second year of undergraduate study, and conducted a series of five focus groups to explore the emerging themes of the survey in more detail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed a wide range of responses in terms of students' familiarity with the tools and what they believe AI tools could and should not be used for. Most students emphasized the importance of understanding how AI tools function and their potential applications in both their academic studies and future careers. The results indicated a strong desire among students to learn more about AI technologies. Furthermore, there was a significant interest in receiving dedicated support for integrating these tools into their coursework, driven by the belief that such skills will be sought after by future employers. However, most students were not familiar with their university's published AI policies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This research on pedagogical methods supports a broader long-term ambition to better understand and improve our teaching, learning, and student engagement through the adoption of AI and the effective use of technology and suggests a need for a more comprehensive approach to communicating these important guidelines on an on-going basis, especially as the tools and guidelines evolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1457299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1457299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Providing one-on-one support to large cohorts is challenging, yet emerging AI technologies show promise in bridging the gap between the support students want and what educators can provide. They offer students a way to engage with their course material in a way that feels fluent and instinctive. Whilst educators may have views on the appropriates for AI, the tools themselves, as well as the novel ways in which they can be used, are continually changing.

Methods: The aim of this study was to probe students' familiarity with AI tools, their views on its current uses, their understanding of universities' AI policies, and finally their impressions of its importance, both to their degree and their future careers. We surveyed 453 psychology and sport science students across two institutions in the UK, predominantly those in the first and second year of undergraduate study, and conducted a series of five focus groups to explore the emerging themes of the survey in more detail.

Results: Our results showed a wide range of responses in terms of students' familiarity with the tools and what they believe AI tools could and should not be used for. Most students emphasized the importance of understanding how AI tools function and their potential applications in both their academic studies and future careers. The results indicated a strong desire among students to learn more about AI technologies. Furthermore, there was a significant interest in receiving dedicated support for integrating these tools into their coursework, driven by the belief that such skills will be sought after by future employers. However, most students were not familiar with their university's published AI policies.

Discussion: This research on pedagogical methods supports a broader long-term ambition to better understand and improve our teaching, learning, and student engagement through the adoption of AI and the effective use of technology and suggests a need for a more comprehensive approach to communicating these important guidelines on an on-going basis, especially as the tools and guidelines evolve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能对教育和职业的影响:学生们怎么看?
简介:为大量学生提供一对一的支持是一项挑战,但新兴的人工智能技术有望弥合学生想要的支持与教育工作者可以提供的支持之间的差距。它们为学生提供了一种以流畅和本能的方式参与课程材料的方式。虽然教育工作者可能对人工智能的适用性有自己的看法,但这些工具本身,以及它们的新使用方式,都在不断变化。方法:本研究的目的是调查学生对人工智能工具的熟悉程度,他们对人工智能当前用途的看法,他们对大学人工智能政策的理解,以及他们对其对他们的学位和未来职业生涯的重要性的印象。我们调查了英国两所大学的453名心理学和运动科学专业的学生,主要是本科一年级和二年级的学生,并进行了一系列的五个焦点小组,以更详细地探讨调查的新主题。结果:我们的结果显示,就学生对工具的熟悉程度以及他们认为人工智能工具可以和不应该用于哪些方面而言,学生的反应范围很广。大多数学生强调了了解人工智能工具的功能及其在学术研究和未来职业生涯中的潜在应用的重要性。结果表明,学生们强烈希望更多地了解人工智能技术。此外,由于相信这些技能将被未来的雇主所追求,他们对将这些工具整合到他们的课程作业中获得专门的支持非常感兴趣。然而,大多数学生并不熟悉他们学校公布的人工智能政策。讨论:这项关于教学方法的研究支持了一个更广泛的长期目标,即通过采用人工智能和有效利用技术,更好地理解和改善我们的教学、学习和学生参与度,并建议需要一种更全面的方法来持续传播这些重要的指导方针,特别是随着工具和指导方针的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness of prompt engineering for knowledge graph question answering. The sociolinguistic foundations of language modeling. Artificial intelligence-based framework for early detection of heart disease using enhanced multilayer perceptron. Dynamic-budget superpixel active learning for semantic segmentation. Protecting digital assets using an ontology based cyber situational awareness system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1