Orthosis Management in Knee Osteoarthritis: Evaluating Existing Recommendations and Achieving Consensus on Implementation Through the Delphi Method.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.70018
Zilan Bazancir-Apaydin
{"title":"Orthosis Management in Knee Osteoarthritis: Evaluating Existing Recommendations and Achieving Consensus on Implementation Through the Delphi Method.","authors":"Zilan Bazancir-Apaydin","doi":"10.1002/msc.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The available evidence on orthosis management in the knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains questionable. This study aims to evaluate existing recommendations and achieve consensus on their implementation through the modified Delphi method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experienced experts in orthosis management for KOA patients participated in three Delphi rounds. Each round involved addressing various questions related to recommended orthosis type such as insole, knee brace, footwear, indications and contraindications, dosage of orthosis usage, follow-up period, long-term side effects, fitting, and weaning procedure. Consensus was defined as  ≥ 70% agreement with a question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved for all questions. Experts frequently recommended custom-made insoles, neoprene knee braces, and appropriate footwear. The recommended duration of insole and knee brace usage averaged 3-6 months. Insole usage was advised during all weight-bearing activities, while knee braces were suggested for 4-6 h per day. Experts recommended orthosis follow-up for an average of 4-6 months. Reduced compliance with orthoses was highlighted by experts as the most significant long-term side effect. The fitting of orthoses is typically evaluated through gait analyses, assessment of symptoms and comfort, and observation of the corrective effects on impaired biomechanics in the clinical setting. Besides, experts commonly recommend a gradual weaning process from orthoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study addresses the existing lack of consensus on orthosis management in KOA and provides essential clinical practice recommendations from multidisciplinary experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The available evidence on orthosis management in the knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains questionable. This study aims to evaluate existing recommendations and achieve consensus on their implementation through the modified Delphi method.

Methods: Experienced experts in orthosis management for KOA patients participated in three Delphi rounds. Each round involved addressing various questions related to recommended orthosis type such as insole, knee brace, footwear, indications and contraindications, dosage of orthosis usage, follow-up period, long-term side effects, fitting, and weaning procedure. Consensus was defined as  ≥ 70% agreement with a question.

Results: Consensus was achieved for all questions. Experts frequently recommended custom-made insoles, neoprene knee braces, and appropriate footwear. The recommended duration of insole and knee brace usage averaged 3-6 months. Insole usage was advised during all weight-bearing activities, while knee braces were suggested for 4-6 h per day. Experts recommended orthosis follow-up for an average of 4-6 months. Reduced compliance with orthoses was highlighted by experts as the most significant long-term side effect. The fitting of orthoses is typically evaluated through gait analyses, assessment of symptoms and comfort, and observation of the corrective effects on impaired biomechanics in the clinical setting. Besides, experts commonly recommend a gradual weaning process from orthoses.

Conclusions: This study addresses the existing lack of consensus on orthosis management in KOA and provides essential clinical practice recommendations from multidisciplinary experts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节骨性关节炎的矫形器管理:评估现有建议并通过德尔菲法达成共识。
目的:目前关于膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)矫形器治疗的证据尚存疑问。本研究旨在评估现有的建议,并通过改进的德尔菲法对其实施达成共识。方法:对KOA患者的矫形器管理经验丰富的专家进行三次德尔菲调查。每一轮都涉及到与推荐的矫形器类型相关的各种问题,如鞋垫、膝托、鞋类、适应症和禁忌症、矫形器使用剂量、随访期、长期副作用、矫形器和脱机程序。共识定义为与问题的一致度≥70%。结果:所有问题均获得一致回答。专家经常建议定制鞋垫、氯丁橡胶护膝和合适的鞋子。鞋垫和护膝的推荐使用时间平均为3-6个月。建议在所有负重活动中使用鞋垫,而膝盖支架建议每天使用4-6小时。专家建议矫形器随访时间平均为4-6个月。专家强调,降低对矫形器的依从性是最显著的长期副作用。矫形器的装配通常通过步态分析、症状和舒适度评估以及观察临床环境中对受损生物力学的矫正效果来评估。此外,专家们通常建议逐渐脱离矫形器。结论:本研究解决了目前对KOA矫形器管理缺乏共识的问题,并提供了多学科专家的重要临床实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Pain Catastrophizing Is Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Gaps in Evidence-Based Recommendations for Low Back Pain: Analysis of the Accuracy of the Care Pathway in Primary Care. Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review. Effect of Motivational Interviewing and Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1