Undiagnosed major risk factors in acute ischaemic stroke patients in Qatar: analysis from the Qatar stroke registry.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000819
Kim H Tran, Naveed Akhtar, Sujatha Joseph, Deborah Morgan, Ryan Uy, Blessy Babu, Ashfaq Shuaib
{"title":"Undiagnosed major risk factors in acute ischaemic stroke patients in Qatar: analysis from the Qatar stroke registry.","authors":"Kim H Tran, Naveed Akhtar, Sujatha Joseph, Deborah Morgan, Ryan Uy, Blessy Babu, Ashfaq Shuaib","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the presentation to hospital, subtypes of ischaemic stroke for patients admitted to stroke services in Qatar and their 90-day prognosis based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for those with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke from January 2014 to April 2024. The mRS was dichotomised with favourable outcome (0-2) and unfavourable outcome (3-6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9479 patients were included in the study. Patients with a prior history of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and untreated/undiagnosed for these risk factors on admission were more likely to present with a lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission (p<0.001). These patients were also more likely to present with small vessel disease (SVD) or subcortical stroke (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06) and hypertension (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.96) were more likely to have an mRS score of 3-6 at 90 days while males (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.69), prior antidiabetic therapy (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.79) and undiagnosed diabetes (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.99) were protective against an mRS score of 3-6 at 90 days after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a prior history of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and undiagnosed on admission are more likely to present with a lower NIHSS score but have a worse outcome at 90 days. The lower NIHSS may be explained by a higher frequency of SVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"e000819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examined the presentation to hospital, subtypes of ischaemic stroke for patients admitted to stroke services in Qatar and their 90-day prognosis based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for those with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke from January 2014 to April 2024. The mRS was dichotomised with favourable outcome (0-2) and unfavourable outcome (3-6).

Results: A total of 9479 patients were included in the study. Patients with a prior history of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and untreated/undiagnosed for these risk factors on admission were more likely to present with a lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission (p<0.001). These patients were also more likely to present with small vessel disease (SVD) or subcortical stroke (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06) and hypertension (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.96) were more likely to have an mRS score of 3-6 at 90 days while males (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.69), prior antidiabetic therapy (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.79) and undiagnosed diabetes (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.99) were protective against an mRS score of 3-6 at 90 days after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusion: Patients with a prior history of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and undiagnosed on admission are more likely to present with a lower NIHSS score but have a worse outcome at 90 days. The lower NIHSS may be explained by a higher frequency of SVD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡塔尔急性缺血性卒中患者未确诊的主要危险因素:来自卡塔尔卒中登记的分析。
目的:我们研究了卡塔尔卒中服务机构收治的缺血性卒中患者的住院表现、亚型以及基于修正Rankin量表(mRS)的90天预后,这些患者诊断和未诊断为糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常。方法:对2014年1月至2024年4月收治的急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性分析。mRS分为有利结果(0-2)和不利结果(3-6)。结果:共纳入9479例患者。既往有高血压和血脂异常病史且入院时未对这些危险因素进行治疗/未确诊的患者入院时更有可能出现较低的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(pp结论:既往有高血压和血脂异常病史且入院时未确诊的患者入院时更有可能出现较低的NIHSS评分,但90天预后较差。较低的NIHSS可能是SVD频率较高的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
First validation of the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score purposely designed for use by emergency medical dispatchers for detecting anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke. Volume contracted state, mortality and functional outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Spinal cord demyelination predicts neurological deterioration in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy. Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder. Acute therapeutic effects and pathophysiology of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis neuropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1