Nicholas R Powell, Renee C Geck, Dongbing Lai, Tyler Shugg, Todd C Skaar, Maitreya J Dunham
{"title":"Functional analysis of G6PD variants associated with low G6PD activity in the All of Us Research Program.","authors":"Nicholas R Powell, Renee C Geck, Dongbing Lai, Tyler Shugg, Todd C Skaar, Maitreya J Dunham","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyae170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme protects red blood cells against oxidative damage. Individuals with G6PD-impairing polymorphisms are at risk of hemolytic anemia from oxidative stressors. Prevention of G6PD deficiency-related hemolytic anemia is achievable by identifying affected individuals through G6PD genetic testing. However, accurately predicting the clinical consequence of G6PD variants is limited by over 800 G6PD variants which remain of uncertain significance (VUS). There also remains inconsistency in which deficiency-causing variants are included in genetic testing arrays: many institutions only test c.202G > A, though dozens of other variants can cause G6PD deficiency. Here, we improve G6PD genotype interpretations using the All of Us Research Program data and a yeast functional assay. We confirm that G6PD coding variants are the main contributor to decreased G6PD activity and that 13% of individuals in the All of Us data with deficiency-causing variants would be missed by only genotyping for c.202G > A. We expand clinical interpretation for G6PD VUS, reporting that c.595A > G (\"Dagua\" or \"Açores\") and the novel variant c.430C > G reduce activity sufficiently to lead to G6PD deficiency. We also provide evidence that 5 missense VUS are unlikely to lead to G6PD deficiency, and we applied the new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to recommend classifying 2 synonymous variants as WHO Class C. In total, we provide new or updated clinical interpretations for 9 G6PD variants. We anticipate these results will improve the accuracy, and prompt increased use, of G6PD genetic tests through a more complete clinical interpretation of G6PD variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme protects red blood cells against oxidative damage. Individuals with G6PD-impairing polymorphisms are at risk of hemolytic anemia from oxidative stressors. Prevention of G6PD deficiency-related hemolytic anemia is achievable by identifying affected individuals through G6PD genetic testing. However, accurately predicting the clinical consequence of G6PD variants is limited by over 800 G6PD variants which remain of uncertain significance (VUS). There also remains inconsistency in which deficiency-causing variants are included in genetic testing arrays: many institutions only test c.202G > A, though dozens of other variants can cause G6PD deficiency. Here, we improve G6PD genotype interpretations using the All of Us Research Program data and a yeast functional assay. We confirm that G6PD coding variants are the main contributor to decreased G6PD activity and that 13% of individuals in the All of Us data with deficiency-causing variants would be missed by only genotyping for c.202G > A. We expand clinical interpretation for G6PD VUS, reporting that c.595A > G ("Dagua" or "Açores") and the novel variant c.430C > G reduce activity sufficiently to lead to G6PD deficiency. We also provide evidence that 5 missense VUS are unlikely to lead to G6PD deficiency, and we applied the new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to recommend classifying 2 synonymous variants as WHO Class C. In total, we provide new or updated clinical interpretations for 9 G6PD variants. We anticipate these results will improve the accuracy, and prompt increased use, of G6PD genetic tests through a more complete clinical interpretation of G6PD variants.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.