Development of the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10).

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x
Leah E Cahill, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Catherine L Mah, Jennifer Lp Protudjer, Cynthia Kendell, Mary E Jung, Helen Wong, Ellen T Crumley, Meghan Day, Karen T Y Tang, Yan Huang, Jyoti Sihag, Laura Brady, Karthik K Tennankore, Navdeep Tangri, Rebecca C Mollard, Dylan MacKay
{"title":"Development of the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10).","authors":"Leah E Cahill, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Catherine L Mah, Jennifer Lp Protudjer, Cynthia Kendell, Mary E Jung, Helen Wong, Ellen T Crumley, Meghan Day, Karen T Y Tang, Yan Huang, Jyoti Sihag, Laura Brady, Karthik K Tennankore, Navdeep Tangri, Rebecca C Mollard, Dylan MacKay","doi":"10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health nutrition recommendations and clinical dietary interventions emphasize eating healthy food at home, implicitly requiring household foodwork. Household foodwork is defined as the physical and mental tasks a household does for eating meals and snacks. Because no tools exist to measure it, how much time people spend doing household foodwork and the foodwork barriers they experience remain unknown. The objective of the present research was to develop the first stand-alone household foodwork assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through informal interviews with partners with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers, a literature review, a stakeholder meeting of advisors, and a two-round electronic Delphi process including face/content validation by expert panelists (n = 21), we developed the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10). An optional accompanying module was developed to collect self-identified demographic data to provide context for understanding how social-structural positionality factors may interact to influence foodwork.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FIA-Q10 assesses the domains of household composition, frequency of eating at home, special diets within a household, foodwork stress intensity, foodwork barriers, desired supports related to foodwork, and time use for foodwork. The FIA-Q10 measures time use for four subdomains of foodwork among individuals and their households: (1) planning, (2) getting, (3) preparing/cooking, and (4) cleaning up food. In the second Delphi round, the FIA-Q10 scored 95% for language appropriateness, 67% for visual appropriateness, 95% for relevance, 95% for representativeness, and 95% for distribution. Suggested improvements were implemented. All Delphi panelists (100%) reported they would consider using the FIA-Q10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FIA-Q10's development is the first step towards a standardized assessment of foodwork, enabling examination of challenges in foodwork that may impact nutrition and nutrition equity. Future research will focus on FIA-Q10 validation in multiple populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"21 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public health nutrition recommendations and clinical dietary interventions emphasize eating healthy food at home, implicitly requiring household foodwork. Household foodwork is defined as the physical and mental tasks a household does for eating meals and snacks. Because no tools exist to measure it, how much time people spend doing household foodwork and the foodwork barriers they experience remain unknown. The objective of the present research was to develop the first stand-alone household foodwork assessment tool.

Methods: Through informal interviews with partners with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers, a literature review, a stakeholder meeting of advisors, and a two-round electronic Delphi process including face/content validation by expert panelists (n = 21), we developed the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10). An optional accompanying module was developed to collect self-identified demographic data to provide context for understanding how social-structural positionality factors may interact to influence foodwork.

Results: The FIA-Q10 assesses the domains of household composition, frequency of eating at home, special diets within a household, foodwork stress intensity, foodwork barriers, desired supports related to foodwork, and time use for foodwork. The FIA-Q10 measures time use for four subdomains of foodwork among individuals and their households: (1) planning, (2) getting, (3) preparing/cooking, and (4) cleaning up food. In the second Delphi round, the FIA-Q10 scored 95% for language appropriateness, 67% for visual appropriateness, 95% for relevance, 95% for representativeness, and 95% for distribution. Suggested improvements were implemented. All Delphi panelists (100%) reported they would consider using the FIA-Q10.

Conclusions: The FIA-Q10's development is the first step towards a standardized assessment of foodwork, enabling examination of challenges in foodwork that may impact nutrition and nutrition equity. Future research will focus on FIA-Q10 validation in multiple populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10题家庭食品相互作用评估问卷(FIA-Q10)的开发。
背景:公共卫生营养建议和临床饮食干预强调在家吃健康食品,隐含地要求家庭食品。家庭食品劳动被定义为一个家庭为吃正餐和零食所做的体力和脑力劳动。由于没有工具来衡量它,人们花在家务上的时间和他们遇到的障碍仍然未知。本研究的目的是开发第一个独立的家庭食品工作评估工具。方法:通过对有生活经验的合作伙伴、临床医生和研究人员的非正式访谈、文献综述、利益相关者顾问会议和两轮电子德尔菲过程,包括专家小组成员的面部/内容验证(n = 21),我们制定了10个问题的家庭食品工作互动评估问卷(FIA-Q10)。开发了一个可选的附带模块,用于收集自我识别的人口统计数据,为了解社会结构位置因素如何相互作用以影响食品工作提供背景。结果:FIA-Q10评估了家庭组成、在家吃饭的频率、家庭中的特殊饮食、食物工作压力强度、食物工作障碍、与食物工作相关的期望支持和食物工作的时间使用等领域。FIA-Q10衡量个人及其家庭在食品工作的四个子领域的时间使用情况:(1)计划,(2)获取,(3)准备/烹饪和(4)清理食物。在第二轮德尔菲中,FIA-Q10的语言恰当性得分为95%,视觉恰当性得分为67%,相关性得分为95%,代表性得分为95%,分布得分为95%。建议的改进得到实施。所有德尔菲专家组成员(100%)报告说他们会考虑使用FIA-Q10。结论:FIA-Q10的制定是对粮食工作进行标准化评估的第一步,使人们能够审查粮食工作中可能影响营养和营养公平的挑战。未来的研究将侧重于在多个人群中验证FIA-Q10。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
期刊最新文献
Is meeting 24-hour movement guidelines associated with a lower risk of frailty among adults? Communicating physical activity messages with adolescents: what works? A scoping review with stakeholder consultation. Characterizing co-purchased food products with soda, fresh fruits, and fresh vegetables using loyalty card purchasing data in Montréal, Canada, 2015-2017. Socioecological correlates of parental lifestyle patterns during the antenatal period. The development of emotional overeating: a longitudinal twin study from toddlerhood to early adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1