A qualitative study of the experiences of patients with prostate cancer when receiving negative genetic results: "I still don't have a grasp of what it all means".

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.2003
Kimberly Zayhowski, Catharine Wang, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen Gignac, Christine Gunn
{"title":"A qualitative study of the experiences of patients with prostate cancer when receiving negative genetic results: \"I still don't have a grasp of what it all means\".","authors":"Kimberly Zayhowski, Catharine Wang, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen Gignac, Christine Gunn","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Germline genetic testing has been increasingly conducted for treatment implications in patients with prostate cancer due to the expansion of testing eligibility. Understanding patients' comprehension of genetic results is crucial for establishing effective result disclosure practices. This importance has grown due to the increasing prevalence of negative genetic results being conveyed via electronic communication and by providers without a genetics specialization. This study explores patients with prostate cancer's perceptions of genetic results communication. We analyzed 24 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with patients with prostate cancer at an urban safety-net hospital who had genetic results documented in their medical records. Interview questions focused on patient experiences with genetic referrals, genetic counseling, and genetic result disclosure. Audio recordings were professionally transcribed and analyzed by the study team utilizing an inductive thematic approach to generate themes from recurring codes. Of those who participated, 18 were interviewed in English, 5 in Spanish, and 1 in Haitian Creole. No participants reported having a pathogenic variant identified with genetic testing. Study participants identified a number of gaps in results communication which led to misconceptions regarding hereditary cancer risk. Three themes were generated: (1) Patients desired clear communication about the next steps after genetic testing, (2) Patients commonly experienced cognitive dissonance with negative genetic results given personal and family history of cancer, and (3) Patients felt reassurance from negative genetic results. This research suggests that maintaining conversations between patients and healthcare providers alongside the delivery of negative results assists in patient comprehension. Additionally, it is essential to evaluate the accessibility and appropriateness of notes and results sent to patients. Ultimately, understanding communication barriers in genetic results return is imperative in order to provide high-quality genetic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.2003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Germline genetic testing has been increasingly conducted for treatment implications in patients with prostate cancer due to the expansion of testing eligibility. Understanding patients' comprehension of genetic results is crucial for establishing effective result disclosure practices. This importance has grown due to the increasing prevalence of negative genetic results being conveyed via electronic communication and by providers without a genetics specialization. This study explores patients with prostate cancer's perceptions of genetic results communication. We analyzed 24 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with patients with prostate cancer at an urban safety-net hospital who had genetic results documented in their medical records. Interview questions focused on patient experiences with genetic referrals, genetic counseling, and genetic result disclosure. Audio recordings were professionally transcribed and analyzed by the study team utilizing an inductive thematic approach to generate themes from recurring codes. Of those who participated, 18 were interviewed in English, 5 in Spanish, and 1 in Haitian Creole. No participants reported having a pathogenic variant identified with genetic testing. Study participants identified a number of gaps in results communication which led to misconceptions regarding hereditary cancer risk. Three themes were generated: (1) Patients desired clear communication about the next steps after genetic testing, (2) Patients commonly experienced cognitive dissonance with negative genetic results given personal and family history of cancer, and (3) Patients felt reassurance from negative genetic results. This research suggests that maintaining conversations between patients and healthcare providers alongside the delivery of negative results assists in patient comprehension. Additionally, it is essential to evaluate the accessibility and appropriateness of notes and results sent to patients. Ultimately, understanding communication barriers in genetic results return is imperative in order to provide high-quality genetic care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于前列腺癌患者在接受阴性基因检测时经历的定性研究:“我仍然不明白这一切意味着什么”。
生殖系基因检测越来越多地用于前列腺癌患者的治疗意义,因为检测资格的扩大。了解患者对遗传结果的理解对于建立有效的结果披露实践至关重要。由于越来越多的负面遗传结果通过电子通信和没有遗传学专业的提供者传达,这种重要性已经增加。本研究探讨前列腺癌患者对基因结果交流的认知。我们分析了24个定性的、半结构化的访谈,访谈对象是在一家城市安全网医院就诊的前列腺癌患者,他们的医疗记录中记录了遗传结果。访谈问题集中在遗传转诊、遗传咨询和遗传结果披露方面的患者经历。音频记录由研究小组专业转录和分析,利用归纳主题方法从重复代码中生成主题。在参与访谈的人中,有18人用英语访谈,5人用西班牙语访谈,1人用海地克里奥尔语访谈。没有参与者报告在基因检测中发现致病性变异。研究参与者确定了结果交流中的一些差距,这些差距导致了对遗传性癌症风险的误解。产生了三个主题:(1)患者希望对基因检测后的下一步进行明确的沟通;(2)由于个人和家族史的癌症,患者通常会因基因检测结果阴性而经历认知失调;(3)患者从基因检测结果阴性中获得安慰。这项研究表明,在提供负面结果的同时,保持患者和医疗保健提供者之间的对话有助于患者的理解。此外,评估发送给患者的笔记和结果的可及性和适当性至关重要。最终,了解遗传结果返回中的沟通障碍是必要的,以便提供高质量的遗传护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
Navigating sexual orientation and gender identity data privacy concerns in United States genetics practices Revision request to the standardized pedigree nomenclature regarding surrogacy versus gestational carriers and suggestion for new nomenclature pertaining to embryo adoption Genetic testing for children at risk to be hemophilia carriers Issue Information A heartfelt thank you to the 2024 Journal of Genetic Counseling reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1