VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM RISK ASSESSMENT IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN PAKISTAN.

Ajwad Farogh, Noman Ullah Wazir, Saima Mumtaz, Farzana Salman, Ahsan Arif, Anam Umair
{"title":"VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM RISK ASSESSMENT IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN PAKISTAN.","authors":"Ajwad Farogh, Noman Ullah Wazir, Saima Mumtaz, Farzana Salman, Ahsan Arif, Anam Umair","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-02-13243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) ranks as the third most common cause of vascular death following myocardial infarction and stroke. VTE is a prevalent illness, particularly in the elderly, and is linked to a high recurrence rate, substantial healthcare costs, and reduced survival rates. The Objective of the study was to investigate the impact of using the VTE risk assessment (VTE-RA) tool and thromboprophylaxis (TP) on all adult patients hospitalized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at a single centre using a prospective cross-sectional design to compare data before and after an intervention at a tertiary referral hospital in Pakistan from May 2019 to February 2020. All adult inpatients over the age of 18 were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,200 patients were screened in the study. The majority of these patients were medical 701(58.42%) and 499(41.58%) were surgical. The mean age of patients was 59.02±1.40 years. The male patients were 690(57.55%) as compared with females were 510(42.5%). The average stay in hospital was 8.01±1.11 days. At that time, there was no official RA instrument implemented. Researchers documented any written proof of RA in patients' medical records as \"RA completed.\" 190(15.83%) out of all charts evaluated had a recorded VTE risk assessment. TP was prescribed to 450(37.5%) patients, which accounts for of the total. Risk factors for VTE in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VTE risk assessment, prescribing adequate thromboprophylaxis, and integrating it into practice is challenging. The majority of hospitalized patients investigated were at a high risk of having venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most prevalent risk factor for developing VTE is old age, however, only few hospitalized patients were actually given thromboprophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":517395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"36 2","pages":"383-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-02-13243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) ranks as the third most common cause of vascular death following myocardial infarction and stroke. VTE is a prevalent illness, particularly in the elderly, and is linked to a high recurrence rate, substantial healthcare costs, and reduced survival rates. The Objective of the study was to investigate the impact of using the VTE risk assessment (VTE-RA) tool and thromboprophylaxis (TP) on all adult patients hospitalized.

Methods: This study was conducted at a single centre using a prospective cross-sectional design to compare data before and after an intervention at a tertiary referral hospital in Pakistan from May 2019 to February 2020. All adult inpatients over the age of 18 were eligible for inclusion.

Results: A total of 1,200 patients were screened in the study. The majority of these patients were medical 701(58.42%) and 499(41.58%) were surgical. The mean age of patients was 59.02±1.40 years. The male patients were 690(57.55%) as compared with females were 510(42.5%). The average stay in hospital was 8.01±1.11 days. At that time, there was no official RA instrument implemented. Researchers documented any written proof of RA in patients' medical records as "RA completed." 190(15.83%) out of all charts evaluated had a recorded VTE risk assessment. TP was prescribed to 450(37.5%) patients, which accounts for of the total. Risk factors for VTE in high-risk patients.

Conclusions: VTE risk assessment, prescribing adequate thromboprophylaxis, and integrating it into practice is challenging. The majority of hospitalized patients investigated were at a high risk of having venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most prevalent risk factor for developing VTE is old age, however, only few hospitalized patients were actually given thromboprophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦三级医院住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估
背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是继心肌梗死和中风之后血管性死亡的第三大常见原因。静脉血栓栓塞是一种普遍的疾病,特别是在老年人中,与高复发率、高额医疗费用和降低生存率有关。本研究的目的是探讨静脉血栓栓塞风险评估(VTE- ra)工具和血栓预防(TP)对所有住院成年患者的影响。方法:本研究在单中心进行,采用前瞻性横断面设计,比较2019年5月至2020年2月巴基斯坦一家三级转诊医院干预前后的数据。所有18岁以上的成年住院患者均符合纳入条件。结果:本研究共筛选了1200例患者。其中内科701例(58.42%),外科499例(41.58%)。患者平均年龄59.02±1.40岁。男性690例(57.55%),女性510例(42.5%)。平均住院时间为8.01±1.11 d。当时,没有正式实施RA工具。研究人员在患者的医疗记录中记录了任何风湿性关节炎的书面证据,并将其标记为“风湿性关节炎已完成”。190例(15.83%)有静脉血栓栓塞风险评估记录。TP患者450例(37.5%),占全部患者的37.5%。高危患者静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素。结论:静脉血栓栓塞风险评估,处方充分的血栓预防,并将其纳入实践是具有挑战性的。调查的大多数住院患者有静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的高风险。发生静脉血栓栓塞最常见的危险因素是老年,然而,只有少数住院患者实际上接受了血栓预防治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PREVALENCE AND PATTERN OF INJURY IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES PRESENTED AT KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE PESHAWAR. PREOPERATIVE DENOSUMAB AND FEASIBILITY OF LESS MORBID SURGERY IN CAMPANACCI STAGE 3 GIANT CELL TUMOUR OF BONE. ADENOMYOEPITHELIOMA WITH CARCINOMA; EPITHELIAL-MYOEPITHELIAL CARCINOMA WITH EARLY PULMONARY METASTASIS. ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF RECTUS SHEATH BLOCK IN GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY. ASSOCIATION OF CONSANGUINITY WITH RECURRENT FOETAL LOSS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1