{"title":"Effects of psychoplastogens on blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Abigail E. Calder, Adrian Hase, Gregor Hasler","doi":"10.1038/s41380-024-02830-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are often used as a biomarker for the rapid plasticity-promoting effects of ketamine, psychedelics, and other psychoplastogens in humans. However, studies analyzing peripheral BDNF after psychoplastogen exposure show mixed results. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to test whether the rapid upregulation of neuroplasticity seen in preclinical studies is detectable using peripheral BDNF in humans. This analysis was pre-registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022333096) and funded by the University of Fribourg. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO to meta-analyze the effects of all available psychoplastogens on peripheral BDNF levels in humans, including ketamine, esketamine, LSD, psilocybin, ayahuasca, DMT, MDMA, scopolamine, and rapastinel. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools. Using meta-regressions and mixed effects models, we additionally analyzed the impact of several potential moderators. We included 29 studies and found no evidence that psychoplastogens elevate peripheral BDNF levels in humans (SMD = 0.024, p = 0.64). This result was not affected by drug, dose, blood fraction, participant age, or psychiatric diagnoses. In general, studies with better-controlled designs and fewer missing values reported smaller effect sizes. Later measurement timepoints showed minimally larger effects on BDNF. These data suggest that peripheral BDNF levels do not change after psychoplastogen administration in humans. It is possible that peripheral BDNF is not an informative marker of rapid changes in neuroplasticity, or that preclinical findings on psychoplastogens and neuroplasticity may not translate to human subjects. Limitations of this analysis include the reliability and validity of BDNF measurement and low variation in some potential moderators. More precise methods of measuring rapid changes in neuroplasticity, including neuroimaging and stimulation-based methods, are recommended for future studies attempting to translate preclinical findings to humans.","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"30 2","pages":"763-776"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02830-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02830-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are often used as a biomarker for the rapid plasticity-promoting effects of ketamine, psychedelics, and other psychoplastogens in humans. However, studies analyzing peripheral BDNF after psychoplastogen exposure show mixed results. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to test whether the rapid upregulation of neuroplasticity seen in preclinical studies is detectable using peripheral BDNF in humans. This analysis was pre-registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022333096) and funded by the University of Fribourg. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO to meta-analyze the effects of all available psychoplastogens on peripheral BDNF levels in humans, including ketamine, esketamine, LSD, psilocybin, ayahuasca, DMT, MDMA, scopolamine, and rapastinel. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools. Using meta-regressions and mixed effects models, we additionally analyzed the impact of several potential moderators. We included 29 studies and found no evidence that psychoplastogens elevate peripheral BDNF levels in humans (SMD = 0.024, p = 0.64). This result was not affected by drug, dose, blood fraction, participant age, or psychiatric diagnoses. In general, studies with better-controlled designs and fewer missing values reported smaller effect sizes. Later measurement timepoints showed minimally larger effects on BDNF. These data suggest that peripheral BDNF levels do not change after psychoplastogen administration in humans. It is possible that peripheral BDNF is not an informative marker of rapid changes in neuroplasticity, or that preclinical findings on psychoplastogens and neuroplasticity may not translate to human subjects. Limitations of this analysis include the reliability and validity of BDNF measurement and low variation in some potential moderators. More precise methods of measuring rapid changes in neuroplasticity, including neuroimaging and stimulation-based methods, are recommended for future studies attempting to translate preclinical findings to humans.
脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的外周水平通常被用作氯胺酮、致幻剂和其他精神致塑剂对人类快速可塑性促进作用的生物标志物。然而,研究分析暴露于心理药物后的外周BDNF显示出不同的结果。在这项荟萃分析中,我们的目的是测试临床前研究中发现的神经可塑性的快速上调是否可以在人类外周血BDNF中检测到。方法本研究采用预注册(PROSPERO ID: CRD42022333096),由弗里堡大学资助。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Web of Science和PsycINFO,以荟萃分析所有可用的精神药物对人类外周血BDNF水平的影响,包括氯胺酮、艾氯胺酮、LSD、裸盖菇素、死藤水、DMT、MDMA、东莨菪碱和rapastine。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。使用元回归和混合效应模型,我们还分析了几个潜在调节因子的影响。结果我们纳入了29项研究,没有发现精神致原性药物能提高人外周血BDNF水平的证据(SMD = 0.024, p = 0.64)。该结果不受药物、剂量、血液成分、参与者年龄或精神诊断的影响。一般来说,具有较好控制设计和较少缺失值的研究报告的效应大小较小。后来的测量时间点显示对BDNF的影响最小。结论这些数据表明,在给药后,人类外周BDNF水平没有改变。有可能外周BDNF并不是神经可塑性快速变化的信息标记,或者关于精神致癌物和神经可塑性的临床前研究结果可能不适用于人类受试者。该分析的局限性包括BDNF测量的可靠性和有效性以及一些潜在调节因子的低变异。更精确的测量神经可塑性快速变化的方法,包括神经成像和基于刺激的方法,被推荐用于试图将临床前研究结果转化为人类的未来研究。
期刊介绍:
Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.