Comparing effectiveness of 3-needle approach versus 5-needle approach of genicular nerve block on pain and quality of life in chronic osteoarthritis of knee: a double blinded randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07938-5
Megha Bhargava, Ravi Gaur, Nitesh Manohar Gonnade, G Sarankumar, Abhay Elhence, Nitesh Gahlot
{"title":"Comparing effectiveness of 3-needle approach versus 5-needle approach of genicular nerve block on pain and quality of life in chronic osteoarthritis of knee: a double blinded randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Megha Bhargava, Ravi Gaur, Nitesh Manohar Gonnade, G Sarankumar, Abhay Elhence, Nitesh Gahlot","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07938-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis [KOA] is a common musculoskeletal disorder that is characterized by degeneration of the articular cartilage and the subchondral bone. It leads to pain and functional limitations in the joint. Genicular Nerve Blocks [GNB] or Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation [GNRFA] are pain-reducing procedures that can be used in such patients. Newer and more accurate anatomical landmarks for genicular nerves are being identified. More named genicular nerves are also being targeted for better pain relief.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block using 3-point approach versus 5-point approach in patients of chronic knee Osteoarthritis on pain and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A double blinded randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [PMR], All India Institute of Medical Sciences [AIIMS], Jodhpur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provided consent were enrolled in the study and randomized into one of the two groups: GNB-CAT or GNB-RT. The patients underwent the procedure according to the allocated group, using a drug admixture of lidocaine and triamcinolone acetonide. The total dose of steroid used was constant in both groups. The patients were advised of a post-procedure rehabilitation protocol. Pain was assessed using an 11-point NRS, the functional status of the knee was evaluated using the TUG test duration and quality of life was assessed using the QoL component of the KOOS. The outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and 1 month and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 patients, 90 in each group, were followed for 3 months. A reduction in pain and TUG test duration was noted at 1 and 3 months post-procedure in both groups. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups except that the patients who received GNB via the 5-nerve protocol reported a higher improvement in quality of life (58.54 ± 12.01 versus 54.02 ± 13.12, p-value = 0.011) after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A larger volume of injectate seeps through the cortices of long bones per injection site. This leads to the blockade of other smaller, unnamed nerves and non-neural pain generators around the knee joint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results revealed no significant difference between the groups; however, there was a considerable decrease in pain and TUG test durations within the groups. Consequently, neither strategy was better than the other. The group that received GNB via a 5-point method had a superior QoL-KOOS at three months following the procedure.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India [CTRI/2023/06/054401] with registration date of 26/06/2023, after approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur (Certificate Reference Number: AIIMS/EIC/2022/4201) with a date of 23/09/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07938-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis [KOA] is a common musculoskeletal disorder that is characterized by degeneration of the articular cartilage and the subchondral bone. It leads to pain and functional limitations in the joint. Genicular Nerve Blocks [GNB] or Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation [GNRFA] are pain-reducing procedures that can be used in such patients. Newer and more accurate anatomical landmarks for genicular nerves are being identified. More named genicular nerves are also being targeted for better pain relief.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block using 3-point approach versus 5-point approach in patients of chronic knee Osteoarthritis on pain and quality of life.

Study design: A double blinded randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [PMR], All India Institute of Medical Sciences [AIIMS], Jodhpur.

Methods: Patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provided consent were enrolled in the study and randomized into one of the two groups: GNB-CAT or GNB-RT. The patients underwent the procedure according to the allocated group, using a drug admixture of lidocaine and triamcinolone acetonide. The total dose of steroid used was constant in both groups. The patients were advised of a post-procedure rehabilitation protocol. Pain was assessed using an 11-point NRS, the functional status of the knee was evaluated using the TUG test duration and quality of life was assessed using the QoL component of the KOOS. The outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and 1 month and 3 months.

Results: A total of 180 patients, 90 in each group, were followed for 3 months. A reduction in pain and TUG test duration was noted at 1 and 3 months post-procedure in both groups. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups except that the patients who received GNB via the 5-nerve protocol reported a higher improvement in quality of life (58.54 ± 12.01 versus 54.02 ± 13.12, p-value = 0.011) after 3 months.

Limitations: A larger volume of injectate seeps through the cortices of long bones per injection site. This leads to the blockade of other smaller, unnamed nerves and non-neural pain generators around the knee joint.

Conclusions: The results revealed no significant difference between the groups; however, there was a considerable decrease in pain and TUG test durations within the groups. Consequently, neither strategy was better than the other. The group that received GNB via a 5-point method had a superior QoL-KOOS at three months following the procedure.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India [CTRI/2023/06/054401] with registration date of 26/06/2023, after approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur (Certificate Reference Number: AIIMS/EIC/2022/4201) with a date of 23/09/2022.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较膝神经阻滞3针入路与5针入路对慢性膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和生活质量的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
背景:膝关节骨性关节炎是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,其特征是关节软骨和软骨下骨的退变。它会导致关节疼痛和功能限制。膝神经阻滞(GNB)或膝神经射频消融(GNRFA)是可用于此类患者的减轻疼痛的手术。更新和更准确的解剖标志膝神经正在确定。更多被命名为膝神经的神经也被用于更好地缓解疼痛。目的:比较超声引导下膝关节神经阻滞3点入路与5点入路治疗慢性膝骨性关节炎患者疼痛和生活质量的效果。研究设计:双盲随机对照试验。单位:焦特布尔全印度医学科学研究所物理医学和康复部。方法:符合纳入和排除标准并同意的患者入组,随机分为GNB-CAT组或GNB-RT组。患者根据分配的组接受手术,使用利多卡因和曲安奈德的药物混合物。两组使用的类固醇总剂量不变。患者被告知术后康复方案。使用11点NRS评估疼痛,使用TUG测试评估膝关节功能状态,使用oos的QoL部分评估生活质量。在基线、1个月和3个月时评估结果。结果:180例患者,每组90例,随访3个月。术后1个月和3个月,两组疼痛和TUG测试时间均有所减少。然而,除了通过5神经方案接受GNB的患者在3个月后的生活质量改善更高(58.54±12.01比54.02±13.12,p值= 0.011)外,两组之间没有显著差异。局限性:每个注射部位有较大体积的注射液渗出长骨皮质。这导致了膝关节周围其他较小的、未命名的神经和非神经性疼痛源的阻塞。结论:两组间无显著性差异;然而,在组内疼痛和TUG测试持续时间有相当大的减少。因此,两种策略都不如另一种。在手术后3个月,通过5点法接受GNB的组有更好的QoL-KOOS。试验注册:本研究在印度临床试验注册中心[CTRI/2023/06/054401]注册,注册日期为2023年6月26日,获得焦特布尔全印度医学科学研究所机构伦理委员会批准(证书参考编号:AIIMS/EIC/2022/4201),注册日期为2023年9月23日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Association between TMG-derived contractile muscle parameters and MRI-based muscle structure in sarcopenia. Effect of temporomandibular joint exercises on mechanical low back pain: a preliminary randomized controlled study. From general to precision rehabilitation: a systematic review of VMO-Targeted versus general quadriceps strengthening in patellofemoral dysplasia. Correction: A collaborative approach of finite element method and machine learning algorithms for biomechanical analysis of implants used in tibial shaft fractures. Effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on kinesiophobia, exercise adherence, and back muscle function after lumbar fusion surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1