Lok Bahadur Shrestha, Katie Tungatt, Anupriya Aggarwal, Aija Stubis, Nicole L Fewings, Christina Fichter, Anouschka Akerman, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Nicodemus Tedla, Sharon Lee, Andrew R Lloyd, Fabienne Brilot, Warwick J Britton, Anthony Kelleher, Ian D Caterson, Mark W Douglas, Rebecca Rockett, Stuart G Tangye, James A Triccas, Stuart G Turville, Kerrie J Sandgren, Rowena A Bull, Anthony L Cunningham
{"title":"Bivalent Omicron BA.1 vaccine booster increases memory B cell breadth and neutralising antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.","authors":"Lok Bahadur Shrestha, Katie Tungatt, Anupriya Aggarwal, Aija Stubis, Nicole L Fewings, Christina Fichter, Anouschka Akerman, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Nicodemus Tedla, Sharon Lee, Andrew R Lloyd, Fabienne Brilot, Warwick J Britton, Anthony Kelleher, Ian D Caterson, Mark W Douglas, Rebecca Rockett, Stuart G Tangye, James A Triccas, Stuart G Turville, Kerrie J Sandgren, Rowena A Bull, Anthony L Cunningham","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current literature informs us that bivalent vaccines will generate a broader serum neutralizing antibody response to multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, but studies on how this breadth relates to the memory B cell (MBC) and T cell responses are sparse. This study compared breadth of neutralising antibody, and memory B and T cell responses to monovalent or a bivalent ancestral/Omicron BA.1 COVID-19 booster vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline and 1-month post-booster, neutralisation activity and frequencies of receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific MBCs and Spike-specific memory T cells were measured against a panel of variants.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both vaccines boosted neutralising antibodies to 5 variants - Wuhan-Hu-1, Delta, BA.1, BA.5 and JN.1, the latter of which had not yet emerged at the time of sample collection. The bivalent vaccine induced a significantly larger increase in nAb against BA.1 and JN.1. Both vaccines boosted RBD-specific MBC responses to Wuhan-Hu-1, Delta, BA.1 and BA.5 variants with a significantly greater increase for BA.1 in the bivalent group. The breadth of MBCs was significantly higher in those who received the bivalent boost and correlated with nAb breadth. Both vaccines significantly boosted Spike-specific T cell responses to the Wuhan-Hu-1 and BA.5 variants, but only the bivalent vaccine boosted BA.1 responses.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These results suggest that the bivalent vaccine confers an advantage against future novel variants due to increased frequency of broadly reactive RBD-specific B cells.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Work supported by NSW Health for the NSW Vaccine, Infection and Immunology Collaborative (VIIM).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"110 ","pages":"105461"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current literature informs us that bivalent vaccines will generate a broader serum neutralizing antibody response to multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, but studies on how this breadth relates to the memory B cell (MBC) and T cell responses are sparse. This study compared breadth of neutralising antibody, and memory B and T cell responses to monovalent or a bivalent ancestral/Omicron BA.1 COVID-19 booster vaccine.
Methods: At baseline and 1-month post-booster, neutralisation activity and frequencies of receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific MBCs and Spike-specific memory T cells were measured against a panel of variants.
Findings: Both vaccines boosted neutralising antibodies to 5 variants - Wuhan-Hu-1, Delta, BA.1, BA.5 and JN.1, the latter of which had not yet emerged at the time of sample collection. The bivalent vaccine induced a significantly larger increase in nAb against BA.1 and JN.1. Both vaccines boosted RBD-specific MBC responses to Wuhan-Hu-1, Delta, BA.1 and BA.5 variants with a significantly greater increase for BA.1 in the bivalent group. The breadth of MBCs was significantly higher in those who received the bivalent boost and correlated with nAb breadth. Both vaccines significantly boosted Spike-specific T cell responses to the Wuhan-Hu-1 and BA.5 variants, but only the bivalent vaccine boosted BA.1 responses.
Interpretation: These results suggest that the bivalent vaccine confers an advantage against future novel variants due to increased frequency of broadly reactive RBD-specific B cells.
Funding: Work supported by NSW Health for the NSW Vaccine, Infection and Immunology Collaborative (VIIM).
背景:目前的文献告诉我们,二价疫苗将对多种SARS-CoV-2变体产生更广泛的血清中和抗体反应,但关于这种广度如何与记忆B细胞(MBC)和T细胞反应相关的研究很少。本研究比较了中和抗体的广度,以及记忆B和T细胞对单价或二价祖先/Omicron BA.1 COVID-19加强疫苗的反应。方法:在基线和增强后1个月,针对一组变体测量受体结合域(RBD)特异性MBCs和spike特异性记忆T细胞的中和活性和频率。结果:两种疫苗都增强了5种变体的中和抗体——武汉-胡-1、德尔塔、BA.1、BA.5和JN.1,后者在样本收集时尚未出现。二价疫苗诱导的针对BA.1和JN.1的nAb显著增加。两种疫苗都增强了对武汉- hu -1、Delta、BA.1和BA.5变体的rbd特异性MBC反应,其中二价组的BA.1显著增加。在接受二价刺激的患者中,MBCs的宽度显著增加,并与nAb宽度相关。两种疫苗都显著增强了对武汉- hu -1和BA.5变异的spike特异性T细胞应答,但只有二价疫苗增强了BA.1应答。解释:这些结果表明,由于广泛反应性rbd特异性B细胞的频率增加,二价疫苗对未来的新变体具有优势。资助:新南威尔士州卫生部为新南威尔士州疫苗、感染和免疫学合作组织(VIIM)支持的工作。
EBioMedicineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.