Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak Classification: intra- and inter-rater agreement, confounding features, and diagnostic performance.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Insights into Imaging Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s13244-024-01858-7
Dong-Dong Jin, Bo-Wen Zhuang, Ke Lin, Nan Zhang, Bin Qiao, Xiao-Yan Xie, Xiao-Hua Xie, Yan Wang
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak Classification: intra- and inter-rater agreement, confounding features, and diagnostic performance.","authors":"Dong-Dong Jin, Bo-Wen Zhuang, Ke Lin, Nan Zhang, Bin Qiao, Xiao-Yan Xie, Xiao-Hua Xie, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01858-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) Bosniak classification, proposed by the European Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) in 2020, predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses (CRMs). However, intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for CEUS features has not been well investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore intra- and inter-rater agreement for US features, identify confounding features, and assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS Bosniak classification.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with complex CRMs who underwent CEUS examination from January 2013 to August 2023. Radiologists (3 experts and 3 novices) evaluated calcification, echogenic content, wall, septa, and internal nodules of CRMs using CEUS Bosniak classification. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using the Gwet agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC). Linear regression identified features associated with discrepancies in Bosniak category assignment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 complex CRMs were analyzed in 103 patients (mean age, 50 ± 15 years; 66 males). Intra-rater agreement for the Bosniak category was substantial to almost perfect (Gwet's AC 0.73-0.87). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for the Bosniak category (Gwet's AC 0.75) and moderate to almost perfect for US features (Gwet's AC 0.44-0.94). Nodule variation (i.e., absence vs. obtuse margin vs. acute margin) explained 84% of the variability in the Bosniak category assignment. CEUS Bosniak classification showed good diagnostic performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.90 for each rater.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEUS Bosniak classification demonstrated substantial intra- and inter-rater reproducibility and good diagnostic performance in predicting the malignancy potential of CRMs. Nodule variations significantly predicted differences in Bosniak category assignments.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification reliably predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses, demonstrating substantial reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy. This improves clinical decision-making and patient management.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for contrast-enhance US features for Bosniak classification have not been well investigated. Substantial inter-rater agreements for the Bosniak category and variable agreements for determining imaging features were found. Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification is reproducible and has good diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in cystic renal masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01858-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) Bosniak classification, proposed by the European Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) in 2020, predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses (CRMs). However, intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for CEUS features has not been well investigated.

Purpose: To explore intra- and inter-rater agreement for US features, identify confounding features, and assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS Bosniak classification.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with complex CRMs who underwent CEUS examination from January 2013 to August 2023. Radiologists (3 experts and 3 novices) evaluated calcification, echogenic content, wall, septa, and internal nodules of CRMs using CEUS Bosniak classification. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using the Gwet agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC). Linear regression identified features associated with discrepancies in Bosniak category assignment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 103 complex CRMs were analyzed in 103 patients (mean age, 50 ± 15 years; 66 males). Intra-rater agreement for the Bosniak category was substantial to almost perfect (Gwet's AC 0.73-0.87). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for the Bosniak category (Gwet's AC 0.75) and moderate to almost perfect for US features (Gwet's AC 0.44-0.94). Nodule variation (i.e., absence vs. obtuse margin vs. acute margin) explained 84% of the variability in the Bosniak category assignment. CEUS Bosniak classification showed good diagnostic performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.90 for each rater.

Conclusions: CEUS Bosniak classification demonstrated substantial intra- and inter-rater reproducibility and good diagnostic performance in predicting the malignancy potential of CRMs. Nodule variations significantly predicted differences in Bosniak category assignments.

Critical relevance statement: Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification reliably predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses, demonstrating substantial reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy. This improves clinical decision-making and patient management.

Key points: Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for contrast-enhance US features for Bosniak classification have not been well investigated. Substantial inter-rater agreements for the Bosniak category and variable agreements for determining imaging features were found. Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification is reproducible and has good diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in cystic renal masses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比增强的美国波斯尼亚分类:内部和内部的一致性,混淆特征,和诊断性能。
背景:欧洲超声医学和生物学联合会(EFSUMB)于2020年提出的对比增强超声(CEUS) Bosniak分类可以预测囊性肾肿块(CRMs)的恶性肿瘤。然而,超声造影特征的内部和内部可重复性尚未得到很好的研究。目的:探讨US特征的内部和内部一致性,识别混淆特征,并评估CEUS Bosniak分类的诊断性能。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2013年1月至2023年8月行超声造影检查的复杂crm患者。放射科医师(3名专家和3名新手)采用超声心动图Bosniak分级评估钙化、回声内容、壁、间隔和内部结节。使用Gwet协议系数(Gwet’s AC)评估内部和内部协议。线性回归确定了与波什尼亚克分类分配差异相关的特征。诊断性能评估使用面积下的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)。结果:103例患者(平均年龄50±15岁;66男性)。波什尼亚族的内部协议基本上是完美的(Gwet的AC为0.73-0.87)。评级间的一致性在波斯尼亚类别中是实质性的(Gwet的AC为0.75),在美国类别中是中等到几乎完美的(Gwet的AC为0.44-0.94)。结节变异(即无结节、钝结节、急性结节)解释了84%的波什尼亚克分类的变异。CEUS Bosniak分类显示出良好的诊断效果,每个评分者的auc范围为0.78 ~ 0.90。结论:CEUS Bosniak分型在预测恶性肿瘤潜能方面具有显著的组内和组间可重复性和良好的诊断性能。结节的变化显著地预测了波什尼亚克分类分配的差异。关键相关性声明:对比增强的US Bosniak分类可靠地预测囊性肾肿块的恶性,证明了大量的可重复性和诊断准确性。这改善了临床决策和患者管理。重点:对比增强美国特征的波什尼亚克分类的内部和内部可重复性尚未得到很好的调查。在波什尼亚克分类和确定成像特征的可变协议方面发现了大量的分级间协议。对比增强的US Bosniak分类具有可重复性,对预测囊性肾肿块具有良好的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency ablation for peribiliary hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis. A machine learning model based on preoperative multiparametric quantitative DWI can effectively predict the survival and recurrence risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Assessing the perceived impact of ESOR training programs on radiologists' professional development. Charting a sustainable future in radiology: evaluating radiologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward environmental responsibility. Diagnosis of adult midgut malrotation in CT: sign of absent retromesenteric duodenum reliable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1