Causal effect of gut microbiota on venous thromboembolism: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12959-024-00676-7
Linfeng Xi, Hongyi Wang, Jie Du, Anqi Liu, Jianping Wang, Yifei Ni, Shuai Zhang, Wanmu Xie, Min Liu, Chen Wang
{"title":"Causal effect of gut microbiota on venous thromboembolism: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Linfeng Xi, Hongyi Wang, Jie Du, Anqi Liu, Jianping Wang, Yifei Ni, Shuai Zhang, Wanmu Xie, Min Liu, Chen Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12959-024-00676-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiota of venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients exhibited significant alterations. However, the causal relationship between gut microbiota and VTE has not been fully understood. This study aimed to assess the causal relationship between gut microbiota and the risk of VTE using a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The gut microbiota and VTE genetic data were collected from the MiBioGen consortium and the UK biobank, respectively. The potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and VTE was investigated using a two-sample MR analysis, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode methods. Cochran's Q-test, MR-PRESSO, and MR-Egger regression intercept analysis were utilized to perform sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the genus level, the results of MR analysis found that Coprococcus1 (OR: 1.0029, 95% CI: 1.0005-1.0054, p = 0.0202) was suggestively linked with an increased risk of VTE, while Slackia (odds ratio (OR): 0.9977, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9957-0.9998, p = 0.0298), Butyricicoccus (OR: 0.9971, 95% CI: 0.9945-0.9997, p = 0.0309), Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group (OR: 0.9972, 95% CI: 0.9946-0.9999, p = 0.0445), and Bacteroides (OR: 0.9964, 95% CI: 0.9932-0.9995, p = 0.0234) were suggestively associated with a reduced risk of VTE. No heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that there were potential causal relationships between five gut microbiota and VTE. Our findings may provide new insights into the mechanisms of VTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22982,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-024-00676-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The gut microbiota of venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients exhibited significant alterations. However, the causal relationship between gut microbiota and VTE has not been fully understood. This study aimed to assess the causal relationship between gut microbiota and the risk of VTE using a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) study.

Methods: The gut microbiota and VTE genetic data were collected from the MiBioGen consortium and the UK biobank, respectively. The potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and VTE was investigated using a two-sample MR analysis, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode methods. Cochran's Q-test, MR-PRESSO, and MR-Egger regression intercept analysis were utilized to perform sensitivity analysis.

Results: At the genus level, the results of MR analysis found that Coprococcus1 (OR: 1.0029, 95% CI: 1.0005-1.0054, p = 0.0202) was suggestively linked with an increased risk of VTE, while Slackia (odds ratio (OR): 0.9977, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9957-0.9998, p = 0.0298), Butyricicoccus (OR: 0.9971, 95% CI: 0.9945-0.9997, p = 0.0309), Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group (OR: 0.9972, 95% CI: 0.9946-0.9999, p = 0.0445), and Bacteroides (OR: 0.9964, 95% CI: 0.9932-0.9995, p = 0.0234) were suggestively associated with a reduced risk of VTE. No heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy was detected.

Conclusion: This study found that there were potential causal relationships between five gut microbiota and VTE. Our findings may provide new insights into the mechanisms of VTE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis Journal
Thrombosis Journal Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Journal is an open-access journal that publishes original articles on aspects of clinical and basic research, new methodology, case reports and reviews in the areas of thrombosis. Topics of particular interest include the diagnosis of arterial and venous thrombosis, new antithrombotic treatments, new developments in the understanding, diagnosis and treatments of atherosclerotic vessel disease, relations between haemostasis and vascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, immunology and obesity.
期刊最新文献
A novel role for protein disulfide isomerase ERp18 in venous thrombosis. Association between red cell distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study. Editorial expression of concern: Lipoxin A4 analogue, BML-111, reduces platelet activation and protects from thrombosis. Lupus anticoagulant associated with low grade B-cell lymphoma and IgM paraproteinaemia with lupus cofactor phenomenon on DRVVT and SCT assays - a possible novel association. Identification of two point mutations associated with inherited antithrombin deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1