Retina and optic nerve diffusion restriction in acute central retinal artery occlusion: A case-control study.

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1177/19714009241303102
Ehab Harahsheh, Nan Zhang, Omer Elshaighi, Parth Parikh, Daniel Gomez, Emilie Weinberg, Joseph M Hoxworth, Tanya J Rath, Oana M Dumitrascu
{"title":"Retina and optic nerve diffusion restriction in acute central retinal artery occlusion: A case-control study.","authors":"Ehab Harahsheh, Nan Zhang, Omer Elshaighi, Parth Parikh, Daniel Gomez, Emilie Weinberg, Joseph M Hoxworth, Tanya J Rath, Oana M Dumitrascu","doi":"10.1177/19714009241303102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency and accuracy of diffusion restriction (DR) of the retina and/or optic nerve (ON) detection on standard brain magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-MRI) in patients presenting with acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study that includes all consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary academic center from 2013-2021 with acute non-arteritic CRAO (cases) or acute ischemic stroke syndrome (controls, age and gender-matched) that had brain MRI performed within 14 days from symptom onset. Two neurology residents (junior and senior), a vascular neurologist, and two neuroradiologists, blinded to the site of CRAO, independently reviewed the brain MRIs to assess for the presence of retina and ON DR. The consensus agreement between the two neuroradiologists was used to perform sensitivity and specificity analyses and calculate inter-rater reliability (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 128 patients with acute non-arteritic CRAO (mean (SD) age 69 (14) years; 50% female; median time from CRAO to DW-MRI 2 days (IQR 1-5)) and 128 age and gender-matched controls with acute cerebral ischemia were included. After the neuroradiologist consensus, DR was correctly identified in the retina or ON in 51/128 (39.8%) CRAO cases, retina alone 27.3%, ON alone 24.2%, and both retina and ON 11.7%, with almost perfect neuroradiologists' inter-rater reliability for retina (K = 0.91) and ON (K = 0.83). Among controls, the retina DR was identified in 1/128 (0.8%) and ON DR in 5/128 (3.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 28.1%, 99.2%, 97.3%, and 58.0% for retina DR, and 27.3%, 96.1%, 87.5%, and 56.9% for ON DR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though experienced neuroradiologists identified retina and ON DR with excellent inter-rater reliability, these are infrequent findings in real world CRAO practice, with excellent specificity but limited sensitivity. Prospective studies with larger cohort of patients, optimization of standardized orbit DWI-MRI protocols are needed to facilitate a more accurate and reliable identification of retina and ON DR in acute CRAO.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241303102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency and accuracy of diffusion restriction (DR) of the retina and/or optic nerve (ON) detection on standard brain magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-MRI) in patients presenting with acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study that includes all consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary academic center from 2013-2021 with acute non-arteritic CRAO (cases) or acute ischemic stroke syndrome (controls, age and gender-matched) that had brain MRI performed within 14 days from symptom onset. Two neurology residents (junior and senior), a vascular neurologist, and two neuroradiologists, blinded to the site of CRAO, independently reviewed the brain MRIs to assess for the presence of retina and ON DR. The consensus agreement between the two neuroradiologists was used to perform sensitivity and specificity analyses and calculate inter-rater reliability (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient).

Results: A total of 128 patients with acute non-arteritic CRAO (mean (SD) age 69 (14) years; 50% female; median time from CRAO to DW-MRI 2 days (IQR 1-5)) and 128 age and gender-matched controls with acute cerebral ischemia were included. After the neuroradiologist consensus, DR was correctly identified in the retina or ON in 51/128 (39.8%) CRAO cases, retina alone 27.3%, ON alone 24.2%, and both retina and ON 11.7%, with almost perfect neuroradiologists' inter-rater reliability for retina (K = 0.91) and ON (K = 0.83). Among controls, the retina DR was identified in 1/128 (0.8%) and ON DR in 5/128 (3.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 28.1%, 99.2%, 97.3%, and 58.0% for retina DR, and 27.3%, 96.1%, 87.5%, and 56.9% for ON DR.

Conclusions: Though experienced neuroradiologists identified retina and ON DR with excellent inter-rater reliability, these are infrequent findings in real world CRAO practice, with excellent specificity but limited sensitivity. Prospective studies with larger cohort of patients, optimization of standardized orbit DWI-MRI protocols are needed to facilitate a more accurate and reliable identification of retina and ON DR in acute CRAO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性视网膜中央动脉闭塞的视网膜和视神经扩散限制:一项病例对照研究。
目的:探讨急性非动脉性视网膜中央动脉闭塞(CRAO)患者标准脑磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI-MRI)检测视网膜和/或视神经(ON)扩散受限(DR)的频率和准确性。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了2013-2021年在我们三级学术中心连续就诊的所有急性非动脉性CRAO(病例)或急性缺血性卒中综合征(对照组,年龄和性别匹配)患者,这些患者在症状出现后14天内进行了脑MRI检查。两名神经内科住院医师(初级和高级),一名血管神经科医生和两名神经放射科医生,对CRAO的位置不知情,独立审查脑mri以评估视网膜和ON dr的存在。两名神经放射科医生的共识协议用于进行敏感性和特异性分析,并计算评级间可靠性(患病率调整偏差调整kappa系数)。结果:128例急性非动脉性CRAO患者(平均(SD)年龄69(14)岁;50%的女性;从CRAO到DW-MRI的中位时间为2天(IQR 1-5)),并纳入128名年龄和性别匹配的急性脑缺血对照组。经神经放射学家共识,51/128 (39.8%)CRAO病例中视网膜或ON的DR被正确识别,视网膜单独27.3%,ON单独24.2%,视网膜和ON均为11.7%,神经放射学家对视网膜(K = 0.91)和ON (K = 0.83)的评分间信度几乎完美。在对照组中,视网膜DR占1/128 (0.8%),ON DR占5/128(3.9%)。视网膜DR的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为28.1%、99.2%、97.3%和58.0%,ON DR的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为27.3%、96.1%、87.5%和56.9%。结论:尽管经验丰富的神经放射科医生发现视网膜和ON DR具有出色的评分间可靠性,但在现实世界的CRAO实践中,这些发现并不常见,特异性很好,但敏感性有限。需要对更大的患者队列进行前瞻性研究,优化标准化的眼眶DWI-MRI方案,以促进更准确、可靠地识别急性CRAO的视网膜和ON DR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Photon-counting CT imaging of a patient with coiled and untreated intracranial saccular aneurysms. Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcome of acute ischemic stroke with absent opacification of the cervical internal carotid artery at CT-angiography after endovascular treatment. The teacher-mentee bond in medicine. Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1