Do Facial Masks Impact Infants' Joint Attention? A Within-Participant Laboratory Study

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infancy Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1111/infa.12640
Stephanie Wermelinger, Lea Moersdorf, Charlotte Baldenweg, Moritz M. Daum
{"title":"Do Facial Masks Impact Infants' Joint Attention? A Within-Participant Laboratory Study","authors":"Stephanie Wermelinger,&nbsp;Lea Moersdorf,&nbsp;Charlotte Baldenweg,&nbsp;Moritz M. Daum","doi":"10.1111/infa.12640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, children were repeatedly confronted with people wearing facial masks. Little is known, however, about how this affected young children's interactions with their caregivers. This preregistered experimental within-participants study explored whether facial masks influence young children's initiation and response to joint attention. Using two structured tasks and one free-play task, we measured joint attention episodes in interactions of 12- to 15-month-old Swiss infants with one of their caregivers during the pandemic. In one experimental condition, the caregivers wore a facial mask; in the other, they did not. The results show no significant differences in infants' joint attention between the two conditions. Infants may have interacted with their caregivers wearing facial masks enough previously not to be influenced by masks; alternatively, even with a partially covered face, a person provides enough information via eyes and other body parts that help infants to guide their attention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, children were repeatedly confronted with people wearing facial masks. Little is known, however, about how this affected young children's interactions with their caregivers. This preregistered experimental within-participants study explored whether facial masks influence young children's initiation and response to joint attention. Using two structured tasks and one free-play task, we measured joint attention episodes in interactions of 12- to 15-month-old Swiss infants with one of their caregivers during the pandemic. In one experimental condition, the caregivers wore a facial mask; in the other, they did not. The results show no significant differences in infants' joint attention between the two conditions. Infants may have interacted with their caregivers wearing facial masks enough previously not to be influenced by masks; alternatively, even with a partially covered face, a person provides enough information via eyes and other body parts that help infants to guide their attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面膜会影响婴儿的联合注意力吗?参与者内部实验室研究。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,儿童多次遇到戴口罩的人。然而,关于这如何影响幼儿与照顾者的互动,我们知之甚少。这项预先注册的实验研究探讨了口罩是否影响幼儿对共同注意的启动和反应。通过两个结构化任务和一个自由游戏任务,我们测量了大流行期间12至15个月大的瑞士婴儿与他们的一名照顾者互动时的联合注意事件。在一种实验条件下,护理人员戴着口罩;在另一种情况下,他们没有。结果显示,两种情况下婴儿的联合注意没有显著差异。婴儿可能与戴口罩的照顾者有过足够多的互动,因此不会受到口罩的影响;另外,即使是部分遮住脸,一个人也可以通过眼睛和其他身体部位提供足够的信息,帮助婴儿引导他们的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Reporting Participant Characteristics 15-Month-Olds’ Understanding of Imitation in Social and Instrumental Contexts Exploring Developmental Connections: Sleep Patterns, Self-Locomotion, and Vocabulary Growth in Early Childhood Maternal Emotional Availability Supports Child Communicative Development Regardless of Child Temperament—Findings From the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study The Infant and Toddler Curiosity Questionnaire: A Validated Caregiver-Report Measure of Curiosity in Children From 5 to 24 Months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1