Investigating behaviours and attitudes regarding recommended vaccination in adults 50 years and above in Australia.

Amalie Dyda, Harriet Lawford, Colleen L Lau, Kim Sampson
{"title":"Investigating behaviours and attitudes regarding recommended vaccination in adults 50 years and above in Australia.","authors":"Amalie Dyda, Harriet Lawford, Colleen L Lau, Kim Sampson","doi":"10.1071/PY24055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Vaccination is important for adults to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with infectious diseases. In Australia, many vaccines are recommended and funded under the Australian National Immunisation Program. However, a number of vaccines are recommended for adults but not funded. This study aimed to explore factors impacting uptake of recommended vaccines in adults aged ≥50years in Australia. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from the general population aged ≥50years. The survey was distributed via a market research company using a convenience sample. Data were analysed descriptively, and logistic regression was used to investigate associations between participant characteristics and vaccine uptake. Results A total of 1012 individuals completed the survey. The majority (67.4%) of participants reported it was important for adults to receive recommended vaccines. More than half (59.6%) felt that vaccination was more important for children. Over 60% of participants reported they knew the vaccines that they should receive. The primary reason reported for not receiving a vaccine was, 'I do not believe it is necessary'. Being aged ≥66years was significantly associated with uptake of influenza, pertussis, herpes zoster, and pneumococcal vaccines. Being female was associated with higher uptake for most vaccines, except for pneumococcal vaccine, where no significant association was found. Conclusions The importance of vaccination and risks associated with lack of vaccination need to be highlighted to this population. Recommendations from healthcare professionals continue to be one of the most important facilitators for uptake. Overall, adults reported they are unlikely to pay for recommended vaccines, making increasing uptake of these vaccines difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Vaccination is important for adults to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with infectious diseases. In Australia, many vaccines are recommended and funded under the Australian National Immunisation Program. However, a number of vaccines are recommended for adults but not funded. This study aimed to explore factors impacting uptake of recommended vaccines in adults aged ≥50years in Australia. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from the general population aged ≥50years. The survey was distributed via a market research company using a convenience sample. Data were analysed descriptively, and logistic regression was used to investigate associations between participant characteristics and vaccine uptake. Results A total of 1012 individuals completed the survey. The majority (67.4%) of participants reported it was important for adults to receive recommended vaccines. More than half (59.6%) felt that vaccination was more important for children. Over 60% of participants reported they knew the vaccines that they should receive. The primary reason reported for not receiving a vaccine was, 'I do not believe it is necessary'. Being aged ≥66years was significantly associated with uptake of influenza, pertussis, herpes zoster, and pneumococcal vaccines. Being female was associated with higher uptake for most vaccines, except for pneumococcal vaccine, where no significant association was found. Conclusions The importance of vaccination and risks associated with lack of vaccination need to be highlighted to this population. Recommendations from healthcare professionals continue to be one of the most important facilitators for uptake. Overall, adults reported they are unlikely to pay for recommended vaccines, making increasing uptake of these vaccines difficult.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查澳大利亚50岁及以上成年人对推荐接种疫苗的行为和态度。
疫苗接种对于降低成人与传染病相关的发病率和死亡率非常重要。在澳大利亚,许多疫苗是由澳大利亚国家免疫规划推荐和资助的。然而,一些疫苗被推荐用于成人,但没有得到资助。本研究旨在探讨影响澳大利亚≥50岁成人接种推荐疫苗的因素。方法对年龄≥50岁的普通人群进行在线横断面调查。该调查是通过一家市场研究公司进行的,使用的是方便样本。对数据进行描述性分析,并使用逻辑回归来调查参与者特征与疫苗摄取之间的关系。结果共1012人完成调查。大多数(67.4%)的参与者报告说,成年人接种推荐的疫苗很重要。超过一半(59.6%)的人认为疫苗接种对儿童更重要。超过60%的参与者报告说他们知道他们应该接种的疫苗。据报道,不接种疫苗的主要原因是“我认为没有必要”。年龄≥66岁与流感、百日咳、带状疱疹和肺炎球菌疫苗的接种率显著相关。女性与大多数疫苗的高吸收率有关,但肺炎球菌疫苗除外,后者未发现显著关联。结论需要向这一人群强调疫苗接种的重要性以及缺乏疫苗接种的相关风险。医疗保健专业人员的建议仍然是最重要的促进因素之一。总体而言,成年人报告说他们不太可能为推荐的疫苗付费,这使得增加这些疫苗的吸收变得困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community healthcare system and its practice for Indigenous elders in Taiwan. Oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in Australian general practice - a retrospective observational study. Exploring oral health challenges and integration strategies in opioid treatment programs: perspectives from clinicians and clients. Exploring the associative relationship between general practice engagement and hospitalisation in older carers to potentially reduce hospital burden. Culturally safe physiotherapy care: how this looks and feels for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1