Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory

Robert D. Gibbons, Diane S. Lauderdale, Robert S. Wilson, David A. Bennett, Tesnim Arar, David A. Gallo
{"title":"Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory","authors":"Robert D. Gibbons,&nbsp;Diane S. Lauderdale,&nbsp;Robert S. Wilson,&nbsp;David A. Bennett,&nbsp;Tesnim Arar,&nbsp;David A. Gallo","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Up to 20% of older adults in the United States have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and about one-third of people with MCI are predicted to transition to Alzheimer's disease (AD) within 5 years. Standard cognitive assessments are long and require a trained technician to administer. We developed the first computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) to more precisely, rapidly, and repeatedly assesses cognitive abilities across the adult lifespan. We present results for a prototype CAT (pCAT-COG) for assessment of global cognitive function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We sampled items across five cognitive domains central to neuropsychological testing (episodic memory [EM], semantic memory/language [SM], working memory [WM], executive function/flexible thinking, and processing speed [PS]). The item bank consists of 54 items, with 9 items of varying difficulty drawn from six different cognitive tasks. Each of the 54 items has 3 response trials, yielding an ordinal score (0–3 trials correct). We also include three long-term memory items not designed for adaptive administration, for a total bank of 57 items. Calibration data were collected in-person and online, calibrated using a bifactor MIRT model, and pCAT-COG scores validated against a technician-administered neuropsychological battery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The bifactor MIRT model improved fit over a unidimensional IRT model (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The global pCAT-COG scores were inversely correlated with age (<i>r</i> = –0.44, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Simulated adaptive administration of 11 items maintained a correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.94 with the total item bank scores. Significant differences between mild and no cognitive impairment (NCI) were found (effect size of 1.08 SD units). The pCAT-COG correlated with clinician-based global measure (<i>r</i> = 0.64).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>MIRT-based CAT is feasible and valid for the assessment of global cognitive impairment, laying the foundation for the development of a full CAT-COG that will draw from a much larger item bank with both global and domain specific measures of cognitive impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>As Americans age, numbers at risk for developing cognitive impairment are increasing.</li>\n \n <li>Aging-related declines in cognition begins decades prior to the onset of obvious cognitive impairment.</li>\n \n <li>Traditional assessment is burdensome and requires trained clinicians.</li>\n \n <li>We developed an adaptive testing framework using multidimensional item response theory.</li>\n \n <li>It is comparable to lengthier in-person assessments that require trained psychometrists.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Up to 20% of older adults in the United States have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and about one-third of people with MCI are predicted to transition to Alzheimer's disease (AD) within 5 years. Standard cognitive assessments are long and require a trained technician to administer. We developed the first computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) to more precisely, rapidly, and repeatedly assesses cognitive abilities across the adult lifespan. We present results for a prototype CAT (pCAT-COG) for assessment of global cognitive function.

METHODS

We sampled items across five cognitive domains central to neuropsychological testing (episodic memory [EM], semantic memory/language [SM], working memory [WM], executive function/flexible thinking, and processing speed [PS]). The item bank consists of 54 items, with 9 items of varying difficulty drawn from six different cognitive tasks. Each of the 54 items has 3 response trials, yielding an ordinal score (0–3 trials correct). We also include three long-term memory items not designed for adaptive administration, for a total bank of 57 items. Calibration data were collected in-person and online, calibrated using a bifactor MIRT model, and pCAT-COG scores validated against a technician-administered neuropsychological battery.

RESULTS

The bifactor MIRT model improved fit over a unidimensional IRT model (p < 0.0001). The global pCAT-COG scores were inversely correlated with age (r = –0.44, p < 0.0001). Simulated adaptive administration of 11 items maintained a correlation of r = 0.94 with the total item bank scores. Significant differences between mild and no cognitive impairment (NCI) were found (effect size of 1.08 SD units). The pCAT-COG correlated with clinician-based global measure (r = 0.64).

DISCUSSION

MIRT-based CAT is feasible and valid for the assessment of global cognitive impairment, laying the foundation for the development of a full CAT-COG that will draw from a much larger item bank with both global and domain specific measures of cognitive impairment.

Highlights

  • As Americans age, numbers at risk for developing cognitive impairment are increasing.
  • Aging-related declines in cognition begins decades prior to the onset of obvious cognitive impairment.
  • Traditional assessment is burdensome and requires trained clinicians.
  • We developed an adaptive testing framework using multidimensional item response theory.
  • It is comparable to lengthier in-person assessments that require trained psychometrists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多维项目反应理论的认知功能自适应测量
在美国,高达20%的老年人患有轻度认知障碍(MCI),大约三分之一的MCI患者预计在5年内会转变为阿尔茨海默病(AD)。标准的认知评估时间很长,需要训练有素的技术人员来管理。我们开发了第一个基于多维项目反应理论(MIRT)的计算机化适应测试(CAT),以更精确、快速和反复地评估成人一生中的认知能力。我们提出了一个用于评估全局认知功能的原型CAT (pCAT-COG)的结果。方法我们选取了神经心理测试的五个认知领域(情景记忆[EM]、语义记忆/语言[SM]、工作记忆[WM]、执行功能/灵活思维和处理速度[PS])中的项目。题库由54个项目组成,其中9个项目的难度不同,取自6个不同的认知任务。54个问题中的每一个都有3次反应试验,产生一个序数得分(0-3次试验正确)。我们还包括三个长期记忆项目,而不是为适应性管理设计的,总共有57个项目。校准数据是亲自和在线收集的,使用双因子MIRT模型进行校准,并根据技术人员管理的神经心理学电池验证pCAT-COG分数。结果双因子MIRT模型比一维IRT模型的拟合效果更好(p <;0.0001)。总体pCAT-COG评分与年龄呈负相关(r = -0.44, p <;0.0001)。11个项目的模拟适应性管理与总项目库得分保持r = 0.94的相关性。轻度和无认知障碍(NCI)之间存在显著差异(效应量为1.08 SD单位)。pCAT-COG与基于临床的整体测量相关(r = 0.64)。基于mirt的CAT对于整体认知障碍的评估是可行和有效的,为开发一个完整的CAT- cog奠定了基础,该CAT- cog将从一个更大的包含整体和领域特定认知障碍测量的题库中提取。随着美国人年龄的增长,面临认知障碍风险的人数正在增加。与年龄相关的认知能力下降在出现明显的认知障碍之前几十年就开始了。传统的评估是繁重的,需要训练有素的临床医生。我们利用多维项目反应理论开发了一个自适应测试框架。这与需要训练有素的心理测量学家进行的更长时间的面对面评估相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review Perspective: Minimally clinically important “symptomatic” benefit associated with disease modification resulting from anti-amyloid immunotherapy Dynamic neurocognitive adaptation in aging: Development and validation of a new scale Unraveling the impact of blood RANKL and OPG levels on Alzheimer's disease: Independent of bone mineral density and inflammation Comparison of sample characteristics of Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants with the Wisconsin state population—An evaluation of the recruitment effort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1