Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.redar.2024.04.001
J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta
{"title":"Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca","authors":"J. Ripollés-Melchor ,&nbsp;M.I. Monge García ,&nbsp;A. Ruiz-Escobar ,&nbsp;E. Sáez-Ruiz ,&nbsp;B. Algar-Yañez ,&nbsp;A. Abad-Motos ,&nbsp;A. Abad-Gurumeta","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6<!--> <!-->min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥<!--> <!-->0.75) for predicting a distance of &lt;<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, ≥<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, and also 563<!--> <!-->m in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve analysis for the &lt;<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for &gt;<!--> <!-->563<!--> <!-->m. Patients with AoPWV &gt;<!--> <!-->10.97<!--> <!-->m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with &lt;<!--> <!-->9.42<!--> <!-->m/s can be considered low risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"71 10","pages":"Pages 710-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624000999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.

Methods

Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 m, ≥ 427 m, and also 563 m in the 6MWT.

Results

The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for > 563 m. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with < 9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.

Conclusions

AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非心脏大手术前6分钟步行试验中测量的预测厌氧能力的估计主动脉脉冲波速度的有效性
本研究旨在评估预估的术前主动脉脉波速度(AoPWV)在等待重大非心脏手术患者6分钟步行试验(6MWT)距离高低之间的区分作用。方法对133例非心脏手术患者进行前瞻性观察研究。评估AoPWV和6MWT期间行走距离。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定两个不同的AoPWV切点,用于预测6MWT中427 m的距离。我们还计算了AoPWV下限和上限切割点(概率≥0.75),用于预测<的距离;427米,≥427米,6MWT为563米。结果ROC曲线分析表明:427 m距离显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.68(95%可信区间:0.56—0.79),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72(95%可信区间:0.61—0.83);563米。AoPWV患者>;10.97 m/s应考虑高风险,而<;9.42 m/s可视为低风险。结论saopwv是一种简便、无创、有效的非心脏大手术患者鉴别和分层工具。在临床不确定的情况下,应采取额外的措施来评估风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
期刊最新文献
Coherencia hemodinámica en 2025: un año de revisión del grupo de Fluidoterapia y Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR) Enfermedad de Forestier: la radiografía que anticipa la vía aérea difícil Parada cardiorrespiratoria perioperatoria en la paciente obstétrica Respuesta a Sethuraman et al. con respecto al artículo «Comparación de la inyección única de morfina neuroaxial y el bloqueo en el plano del músculo erector de la columna en la calidad de la recuperación tras las cirugías gastrointestinales abiertas mayores» Manejo anestésico en un paciente pediátrico con síndrome de Sengers. A propósito de un caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1