Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2024.09.006
James D. Haddad , Natalie Wilson , Vijay S. Are , Shawn L. Shah , Danny Issa , Tarek Sawas , Mohammad Bilal , Thomas Tielleman
{"title":"Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study","authors":"James D. Haddad ,&nbsp;Natalie Wilson ,&nbsp;Vijay S. Are ,&nbsp;Shawn L. Shah ,&nbsp;Danny Issa ,&nbsp;Tarek Sawas ,&nbsp;Mohammad Bilal ,&nbsp;Thomas Tielleman","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is a therapeutic option for gallstone-related gallbladder disease in nonsurgical candidates. However, the optimal stenting strategy and follow-up has not been established. We aimed to determine whether there was a decreased need for unplanned reintervention in patients undergoing placement of two transpapillary gallbladder stents compared with that in those undergoing placement of one stent.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ETGBD between June 2013 and October 2022. The primary outcome was clinical success as defined by resolution of symptoms without the need for another drainage strategy. Secondary outcomes included the adverse events of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, or death. Factors associated with placement of two stents, unplanned reintervention, and adverse events were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>We included 75 patients who underwent ETGBD, with a median follow-up of 407 days (IQR: 71-1504 days). Technical and clinical success were 88.2% and 81.3%, respectively. Unplanned reintervention was significantly lower in the double stenting group (0% vs 25.4%; <em>P</em> = 0.02). Use of a 7 French stent (odds ratio [OR]: 15.5; 95% CI: 1.9-125; <em>P</em> = 0.01) and presence of a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (OR: 10.8; 95% CI: 2.8-41.3; <em>P</em> = 0.001) were associated with placement of two stents. There was no significant difference in adverse events between groups (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.09-8.8; <em>P</em> = 0.94).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>ETGBD is safe and effective in nonoperative candidates. Single transpapillary gallbladder stenting is associated with more unplanned reinterventions, and 7 French stent diameter and previous percutaneous cholecystostomy tube may be associated with ability to place a second stent. Endoscopists should consider planned exchange of solitary transpapillary gallbladder stents or interval placement of a second stent if placement of two stents was unsuccessful at the index procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 1","pages":"Article 150899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is a therapeutic option for gallstone-related gallbladder disease in nonsurgical candidates. However, the optimal stenting strategy and follow-up has not been established. We aimed to determine whether there was a decreased need for unplanned reintervention in patients undergoing placement of two transpapillary gallbladder stents compared with that in those undergoing placement of one stent.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ETGBD between June 2013 and October 2022. The primary outcome was clinical success as defined by resolution of symptoms without the need for another drainage strategy. Secondary outcomes included the adverse events of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, or death. Factors associated with placement of two stents, unplanned reintervention, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

We included 75 patients who underwent ETGBD, with a median follow-up of 407 days (IQR: 71-1504 days). Technical and clinical success were 88.2% and 81.3%, respectively. Unplanned reintervention was significantly lower in the double stenting group (0% vs 25.4%; P = 0.02). Use of a 7 French stent (odds ratio [OR]: 15.5; 95% CI: 1.9-125; P = 0.01) and presence of a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (OR: 10.8; 95% CI: 2.8-41.3; P = 0.001) were associated with placement of two stents. There was no significant difference in adverse events between groups (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.09-8.8; P = 0.94).

CONCLUSION

ETGBD is safe and effective in nonoperative candidates. Single transpapillary gallbladder stenting is associated with more unplanned reinterventions, and 7 French stent diameter and previous percutaneous cholecystostomy tube may be associated with ability to place a second stent. Endoscopists should consider planned exchange of solitary transpapillary gallbladder stents or interval placement of a second stent if placement of two stents was unsuccessful at the index procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下经乳头胆囊引流2个支架vs 1个支架减少再干预:一项多中心研究
背景和目的:内镜下经乳头胆囊引流术(ETGBD)是非手术候选人胆结石相关胆囊疾病的一种治疗选择。然而,最佳支架置入策略和随访尚未确定。我们的目的是确定与放置一个支架的患者相比,放置两个经乳头胆囊支架的患者是否需要减少计划外的再干预。方法:我们对2013年6月至2022年10月期间接受ETGBD的患者进行了多中心回顾性分析。主要结局是临床成功,定义为症状的解决,而不需要另一个引流策略。次要结局包括内镜下逆行胆管造影术后胰腺炎、胆管炎、出血、穿孔或死亡等不良事件。评估与放置两个支架、计划外再干预和不良事件相关的因素。结果我们纳入了75例ETGBD患者,中位随访时间为407天(IQR: 71-1504天)。技术和临床成功率分别为88.2%和81.3%。双支架组的意外再干预率显著降低(0% vs 25.4%;P = 0.02)。使用7 French支架(优势比[OR]: 15.5;95% ci: 1.9-125;P = 0.01)和存在经皮胆囊造瘘管(OR: 10.8;95% ci: 2.8 ~ 41.3;P = 0.001)与放置两个支架相关。两组间不良事件发生率无显著差异(OR: 0.9;95% ci: 0.09-8.8;P = 0.94)。结论etgbd在非手术患者中是安全有效的。单次经乳头胆囊支架植入与更多的意外再介入有关,7 French支架直径和既往经皮胆囊造瘘管可能与放置第二次支架的能力有关。内窥镜医师应考虑计划更换单独的经乳头胆囊支架或间隔放置第二个支架,如果两个支架在索引手术中放置不成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1