Comparison of Different High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography Injection Modes for the Separation of Glabridin

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of separation science Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1002/jssc.70029
Sheng-Bing Wang, Kun Yang, Xing-Cui Wang, Shu Li, Ning-Li Wang, Dong Pei, Lu-Mei Pu, Xin-Yi Huang
{"title":"Comparison of Different High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography Injection Modes for the Separation of Glabridin","authors":"Sheng-Bing Wang,&nbsp;Kun Yang,&nbsp;Xing-Cui Wang,&nbsp;Shu Li,&nbsp;Ning-Li Wang,&nbsp;Dong Pei,&nbsp;Lu-Mei Pu,&nbsp;Xin-Yi Huang","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this work, different injection modes (single injection, overlapping injection, and continuous injection) of countercurrent chromatography were used and compared for the isolation and purification of glabridin from the crude extract of <i>Glycyrrhiza glabra</i>. The two-phase solvent system consisting of <i>n</i>-hexane/ethyl acetate/methanol/water (5:4:5:4, v/v) was employed as stationary and mobile phases. Compared with single injection mode, both overlapping injection and continuous injection modes exhibited higher separation efficiency at the same sample loading capacity. Their total separation times were 89.68% and 53.97% of the single injection mode, and the total solvent consumption were 74.88% and 52.49% of the single injection mode, respectively. Meanwhile, the yield, purity, and recovery rate of these three injection modes were almost the same. It was demonstrated that high-speed countercurrent chromatography in continuous injection mode was the most effective way for separating glabridin in three methods and it can be further applied to the separation of other economically valuable natural products.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, different injection modes (single injection, overlapping injection, and continuous injection) of countercurrent chromatography were used and compared for the isolation and purification of glabridin from the crude extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra. The two-phase solvent system consisting of n-hexane/ethyl acetate/methanol/water (5:4:5:4, v/v) was employed as stationary and mobile phases. Compared with single injection mode, both overlapping injection and continuous injection modes exhibited higher separation efficiency at the same sample loading capacity. Their total separation times were 89.68% and 53.97% of the single injection mode, and the total solvent consumption were 74.88% and 52.49% of the single injection mode, respectively. Meanwhile, the yield, purity, and recovery rate of these three injection modes were almost the same. It was demonstrated that high-speed countercurrent chromatography in continuous injection mode was the most effective way for separating glabridin in three methods and it can be further applied to the separation of other economically valuable natural products.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同高速逆流色谱进样方式分离光甘草定的比较
采用不同的进样方式(单次进样、重叠进样和连续进样),对光甘草粗提物中光甘草定的分离纯化进行了比较。采用正己烷/乙酸乙酯/甲醇/水(5:4:5:4,v/v)两相溶剂体系作为固定相和流动相。与单一进样方式相比,在相同的样品载量下,重叠进样和连续进样均表现出更高的分离效率。总分离时间分别为单次进样的89.68%和53.97%,总溶剂消耗分别为单次进样的74.88%和52.49%。同时,三种注射方式的收率、纯度和回收率基本相同。结果表明,连续进样模式下的高速逆流色谱法是三种方法中分离光甘草定最有效的方法,并可进一步应用于其他具有经济价值的天然产物的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Determination of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine in Raw Kratom Plant Material by a Multisegment Injection Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Separation, Analysis, and Degradation of Cembranoids in Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves Recent Advance in the Synthesis and Applications of Chiral Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Mini-Review Recent Advance in the Synthesis and Applications of Chiral Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Mini-Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1