Machine Learning-Driven Methods for Nanobody Affinity Prediction

IF 3.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Omega Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.4c0971810.1021/acsomega.4c09718
Hua Feng, Xuefeng Sun, Ning Li, Qian Xu, Qin Li, Shenli Zhang, Guangxu Xing, Gaiping Zhang and Fangyu Wang*, 
{"title":"Machine Learning-Driven Methods for Nanobody Affinity Prediction","authors":"Hua Feng,&nbsp;Xuefeng Sun,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Qian Xu,&nbsp;Qin Li,&nbsp;Shenli Zhang,&nbsp;Guangxu Xing,&nbsp;Gaiping Zhang and Fangyu Wang*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c0971810.1021/acsomega.4c09718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Because of their high affinity, specificity, and environmental stability, nanobodies (Nbs) have continuously received attention from the field of biological research. However, it is tough work to obtain high-affinity Nbs using experimental methods. In the current study, 12 machine learning algorithms were compared in parallel to explore the potential patterns between Nb–ligand affinity and eight noncovalent interactions. After model comparison and optimization, four optimized models (SVMrB, RotFB, RFB, and C50B) and two stacked models (StackKNN and StackRF) based on nine uncorrelated (correlation coefficient &lt;0.65) optimized models were selected. All the models showed an accuracy of around 0.70 and high specificity. Compared to the other models, RotFB and RFB were not capable of predicting nonaffinitive Nbs with lower precision (&lt;0.44) but showed higher sensitivity at 0.6761 and 0.3521 and good model robustness (F1 score and MCC values). On the contrary, SVMrB, C50B, and StackKNN were able to effectively predict the future nonaffinitive Nbs (specificity &gt;0.92) and reduce the number of true affinitive Nbs (precision &gt;0.5). On the other hand, StackRF showed intermediate model performance. Furthermore, an in-depth feature analysis indicated that hydrogen bonding and aromatic-associated interactions were the key noncovalent interactions in determining Nb–ligand binding affinity. In summary, the current study provides, for the first time, a tool that can effectively predict whether there is an affinity between nanobodies and their intended ligands and explores the key factors that influence their affinity, which could improve the screening and design process of Nbs and accelerate the development of Nb drugs and applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"9 48","pages":"47893–47902 47893–47902"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c09718","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c09718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of their high affinity, specificity, and environmental stability, nanobodies (Nbs) have continuously received attention from the field of biological research. However, it is tough work to obtain high-affinity Nbs using experimental methods. In the current study, 12 machine learning algorithms were compared in parallel to explore the potential patterns between Nb–ligand affinity and eight noncovalent interactions. After model comparison and optimization, four optimized models (SVMrB, RotFB, RFB, and C50B) and two stacked models (StackKNN and StackRF) based on nine uncorrelated (correlation coefficient <0.65) optimized models were selected. All the models showed an accuracy of around 0.70 and high specificity. Compared to the other models, RotFB and RFB were not capable of predicting nonaffinitive Nbs with lower precision (<0.44) but showed higher sensitivity at 0.6761 and 0.3521 and good model robustness (F1 score and MCC values). On the contrary, SVMrB, C50B, and StackKNN were able to effectively predict the future nonaffinitive Nbs (specificity >0.92) and reduce the number of true affinitive Nbs (precision >0.5). On the other hand, StackRF showed intermediate model performance. Furthermore, an in-depth feature analysis indicated that hydrogen bonding and aromatic-associated interactions were the key noncovalent interactions in determining Nb–ligand binding affinity. In summary, the current study provides, for the first time, a tool that can effectively predict whether there is an affinity between nanobodies and their intended ligands and explores the key factors that influence their affinity, which could improve the screening and design process of Nbs and accelerate the development of Nb drugs and applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Tumor-Targeted Magnetic Micelles for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Drug Delivery, and Overcoming Multidrug Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1