W. Manneschmidt, P. M. Ligrani, M. Sorrell, A. M. Ciccarelli, B. Weigand
{"title":"Normal shock wave coherence relative to other flow events with high and low levels of inlet Mach wave unsteadiness","authors":"W. Manneschmidt, P. M. Ligrani, M. Sorrell, A. M. Ciccarelli, B. Weigand","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01202-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Considered are interactive relationships between a normal shock wave and the downstream shock wave leg of the associated lambda foot, as well as between a normal shock wave and time-varying static pressure as measured along the bottom surface of the test section. Such relationships are investigated as they vary with two different magnitudes of inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity and are characterized using shadowgraph flow visualization data, as well as power spectral density, magnitude-squared coherence, and time lag data. Employed for the investigation is a specialty test section with an inlet Mach number of 1.54, as utilized within a transonic/supersonic wind tunnel. The resulting data provide evidence of distinct interactions over a wide range of frequencies between the normal shock wave and the downstream shock wave leg of the lambda foot for low inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity. Note that these are not present in the same form and over the same ranges of frequency with high inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity. These differences are partially due to the location where flow events originate. The most significant sources of flow unsteadiness within the present investigation are mostly associated with the normal and oblique shock waves (with low inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity), and mostly with inlet flow disturbances from unsteady Mach waves (with high inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity). The present experimental results additionally evidence important connections between the normal shock wave and unsteady flow events within lower portions of the lambda foot, especially near the adjacent boundary layer separation region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"34 6","pages":"497 - 513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01202-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Considered are interactive relationships between a normal shock wave and the downstream shock wave leg of the associated lambda foot, as well as between a normal shock wave and time-varying static pressure as measured along the bottom surface of the test section. Such relationships are investigated as they vary with two different magnitudes of inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity and are characterized using shadowgraph flow visualization data, as well as power spectral density, magnitude-squared coherence, and time lag data. Employed for the investigation is a specialty test section with an inlet Mach number of 1.54, as utilized within a transonic/supersonic wind tunnel. The resulting data provide evidence of distinct interactions over a wide range of frequencies between the normal shock wave and the downstream shock wave leg of the lambda foot for low inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity. Note that these are not present in the same form and over the same ranges of frequency with high inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity. These differences are partially due to the location where flow events originate. The most significant sources of flow unsteadiness within the present investigation are mostly associated with the normal and oblique shock waves (with low inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity), and mostly with inlet flow disturbances from unsteady Mach waves (with high inlet unsteady Mach wave intensity). The present experimental results additionally evidence important connections between the normal shock wave and unsteady flow events within lower portions of the lambda foot, especially near the adjacent boundary layer separation region.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.