Soil amendments alter tree growth and wood decay after forest thinning

Deborah S. Page-Dumroese, Martin F. Jurgensen, Chris A. Miller, Joanne M. Tirocke, Derek N. Pierson, Cole Mayn, Mark J. Kimsey, Haley C. Anderson
{"title":"Soil amendments alter tree growth and wood decay after forest thinning","authors":"Deborah S. Page-Dumroese,&nbsp;Martin F. Jurgensen,&nbsp;Chris A. Miller,&nbsp;Joanne M. Tirocke,&nbsp;Derek N. Pierson,&nbsp;Cole Mayn,&nbsp;Mark J. Kimsey,&nbsp;Haley C. Anderson","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest soil amendments are increasingly used in western US forests to dispose of unmerchantable woody residues, reduce wildfire risk, and improve soil properties. Our objective was to determine the effect of fertilizer and organic amendments on tree growth and organic matter decomposition after thinning. Treatments were a control, three single soil amendments (wood chips, fertilizer, and biochar), and one combined soil amendment (biochar + fertilizer), each applied after thinning a ponderosa pine (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i> Dougl. ex. Laws) stand. After 10 years, amendment treatments had no effect on tree diameter increment (<i>p</i> = 0.600), but the biochar + fertilizer and wood chip treatments significantly increased height growth (<i>p</i> = 0.006). To estimate belowground biological changes, we used wood stakes made from aspen (<i>Populus tremuloides</i> Michx.) and loblolly pine (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) as an index of microbial activity. Stakes were placed: (1) on top of the litter/amendments, (2) at the interface between the litter/amendments and mineral soil, and (3) vertically inserted into the mineral soil, and stake mass loss was measured over 5 years. Stake mass loss of each species was least on the soil surface and increased with increasing depth. Aspen stakes generally had greater mass loss at all three soil locations in the fertilizer and biochar treatments. In contrast, pine stake mass loss was lower than aspen and less affected by fertilizer. Using thinned tree biomass to create amendments can improve forest productivity by enhancing soil conditions and mitigating wildfire. However, the impact of amendments on tree growth may take decades to be detectable.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest soil amendments are increasingly used in western US forests to dispose of unmerchantable woody residues, reduce wildfire risk, and improve soil properties. Our objective was to determine the effect of fertilizer and organic amendments on tree growth and organic matter decomposition after thinning. Treatments were a control, three single soil amendments (wood chips, fertilizer, and biochar), and one combined soil amendment (biochar + fertilizer), each applied after thinning a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex. Laws) stand. After 10 years, amendment treatments had no effect on tree diameter increment (p = 0.600), but the biochar + fertilizer and wood chip treatments significantly increased height growth (p = 0.006). To estimate belowground biological changes, we used wood stakes made from aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) as an index of microbial activity. Stakes were placed: (1) on top of the litter/amendments, (2) at the interface between the litter/amendments and mineral soil, and (3) vertically inserted into the mineral soil, and stake mass loss was measured over 5 years. Stake mass loss of each species was least on the soil surface and increased with increasing depth. Aspen stakes generally had greater mass loss at all three soil locations in the fertilizer and biochar treatments. In contrast, pine stake mass loss was lower than aspen and less affected by fertilizer. Using thinned tree biomass to create amendments can improve forest productivity by enhancing soil conditions and mitigating wildfire. However, the impact of amendments on tree growth may take decades to be detectable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤改良剂改变了森林间伐后树木的生长和木材的腐烂
森林土壤改良剂越来越多地用于美国西部森林,以处理滞销的木质残留物,减少野火风险,改善土壤性质。我们的目的是确定肥料和有机改良剂对树木生长和间伐后有机质分解的影响。处理为对照、三种单一土壤改良剂(木屑、肥料和生物炭)和一种复合土壤改良剂(生物炭+肥料),每一种处理都在黄松(Pinus ponderosa Dougl)疏林后施用。例:法律)成立。10年后,改良处理对树径增长量没有影响(p = 0.600),而生物炭+肥料和木屑处理显著提高了树高增长量(p = 0.006)。为了估计地下生物变化,我们使用白杨(Populus tremuloides Michx.)和火炬松(Pinus taeda L.)木桩作为微生物活性指标。木桩放置于:(1)凋落物/改良剂的顶部,(2)凋落物/改良剂与矿质土的交界面,(3)垂直插入矿质土中,测量了5年内木桩的质量损失。各树种木桩质量损失在土壤表层最小,随深度增加而增加。在施用化肥和生物炭的三个土壤位置上,白杨桩的质量损失普遍较大。相比之下,松木的质量损失低于白杨,且受肥料影响较小。利用稀薄的树木生物量来制造改良剂可以通过改善土壤条件和减轻野火来提高森林生产力。然而,修订对树木生长的影响可能需要几十年才能检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new hydraulic barrier with the gradient distribution of fixed net negative charges An empirical equation for sediment transport capacity of overland flow: Integrating slope, discharge, and particle size A short history of astropedology Microscale imaging of phosphate mobility under unsaturated flow as affected by a fertilizer enhancing polymer Mineralization potential of spent coffee grounds and other nutrient sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1