Refraining from exploiting disaster-hit communities, as an emerging principle of corporate social responsibility

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1111/disa.12671
Ciprian N. Radavoi, Lingling He
{"title":"Refraining from exploiting disaster-hit communities, as an emerging principle of corporate social responsibility","authors":"Ciprian N. Radavoi,&nbsp;Lingling He","doi":"10.1111/disa.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disasters are more destructive and frequent in the age of climate change, overpopulation, and neoliberal globalisation. While the literature on disaster prevention and management proliferates, the role of for-profit corporations has only recently started to be examined, usually through the lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR)—the expectation that business will consider social and environmental interests in its operations, in addition to profit. There is lately much academic creativity in the CSR space pertaining to why and how large corporations should contribute to disaster recovery, but a conceptual red thread is missing. This paper proposes that the unifying concept is the CSR principle of refraining from exploiting disaster-hit communities. Indeed, CSR principles evolve in time, reflecting contemporary societal priorities. In a contractarian perspective on CSR, a rational community would nowadays have solid reasons to expect, in its social contract with business, the latter's commitment to decency when the former is devastated by earthquakes, pandemics, wars, and the like.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disasters are more destructive and frequent in the age of climate change, overpopulation, and neoliberal globalisation. While the literature on disaster prevention and management proliferates, the role of for-profit corporations has only recently started to be examined, usually through the lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR)—the expectation that business will consider social and environmental interests in its operations, in addition to profit. There is lately much academic creativity in the CSR space pertaining to why and how large corporations should contribute to disaster recovery, but a conceptual red thread is missing. This paper proposes that the unifying concept is the CSR principle of refraining from exploiting disaster-hit communities. Indeed, CSR principles evolve in time, reflecting contemporary societal priorities. In a contractarian perspective on CSR, a rational community would nowadays have solid reasons to expect, in its social contract with business, the latter's commitment to decency when the former is devastated by earthquakes, pandemics, wars, and the like.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不利用受灾社区,作为企业社会责任的新兴原则
在气候变化、人口过剩和新自由主义全球化的时代,灾难更具破坏性,也更频繁。虽然关于灾害预防和管理的文献越来越多,但营利性公司的作用直到最近才开始被审视,通常是通过企业社会责任(CSR)的视角——期望企业在其运营中除了利润之外,还会考虑社会和环境利益。最近,在企业社会责任领域有很多关于大公司为什么以及如何为灾难恢复做出贡献的学术创意,但却缺少一个概念上的红线。本文提出,统一的概念是不剥削受灾社区的企业社会责任原则。事实上,企业社会责任原则随着时间的推移而演变,反映了当代社会的优先事项。从契约主义的角度来看,一个理性的社会团体如今有充分的理由期待,在其与企业的社会契约中,当前者遭受地震、流行病、战争等灾难的破坏时,后者会承诺保持正派。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
The gendered politics of the ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: Acholi traditional justice and gender in post-conflict Uganda Exploring the relationship between hurricanes and online sex trafficking advertisements: using Hurricane Laura as a case study Disaster, appropriation, and displacement in the Indian Sundarbans Boolean trust in levels of government: the case of household emergency preparedness Armenia and Türkiye between conflict and cooperation: explaining (with) disaster diplomacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1