Collaborative learning in older age and the role of familiarity: evidence from the map task.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2024.2432879
Kelly Wolfe, Catherine Joan Crompton, Paul Hoffman, Maria Klara Wolters, Sarah Elizabeth MacPherson
{"title":"Collaborative learning in older age and the role of familiarity: evidence from the map task.","authors":"Kelly Wolfe, Catherine Joan Crompton, Paul Hoffman, Maria Klara Wolters, Sarah Elizabeth MacPherson","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2024.2432879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As we age, learning new knowledge and skills becomes more difficult due to age-related changes to cognition. Learning collaboratively could counteract these changes, and perhaps more so when working with someone familiar. This study examined whether collaborative learning is affected by age and partner familiarity. Forty-eight participants (younger <i>n</i> = 24, older <i>n</i> = 24) completed the Map Task with a familiar and unfamiliar same-age partner. Participants became more efficient at completing the Map Task over time, regardless of age and partner familiarity. There was no age difference in immediate or 1-hour recall, but younger adults recalled more after 7 days than older adults. Overall, results suggest that collaborative learning outcomes are unaffected by age or partner familiarity and that collaborative learning has short-term protective effects on memory, with age-related declines only emerging after 7 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2432879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we age, learning new knowledge and skills becomes more difficult due to age-related changes to cognition. Learning collaboratively could counteract these changes, and perhaps more so when working with someone familiar. This study examined whether collaborative learning is affected by age and partner familiarity. Forty-eight participants (younger n = 24, older n = 24) completed the Map Task with a familiar and unfamiliar same-age partner. Participants became more efficient at completing the Map Task over time, regardless of age and partner familiarity. There was no age difference in immediate or 1-hour recall, but younger adults recalled more after 7 days than older adults. Overall, results suggest that collaborative learning outcomes are unaffected by age or partner familiarity and that collaborative learning has short-term protective effects on memory, with age-related declines only emerging after 7 days.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年合作学习与熟悉度的作用:来自地图任务的证据。
随着年龄的增长,学习新的知识和技能变得更加困难,因为与年龄相关的认知变化。协同学习可以抵消这些变化,当与熟悉的人一起工作时可能会更有效。本研究考察了合作学习是否受年龄和合作伙伴熟悉程度的影响。48名参与者(年轻的n = 24,年长的n = 24)与熟悉的和不熟悉的同龄伙伴一起完成了地图任务。随着时间的推移,参与者在完成地图任务时变得更有效率,与年龄和伴侣的熟悉程度无关。即时回忆和1小时回忆没有年龄差异,但年轻人在7天后的回忆比老年人多。总体而言,研究结果表明,协作学习结果不受年龄或合作伙伴熟悉程度的影响,并且协作学习对记忆有短期保护作用,与年龄相关的衰退仅在7天后出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
期刊最新文献
A tale of two ages: fluid reasoning as a predictor of working memory training efficacy in middle-aged and older adults. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with multiple cognitive domains in a community sample of older adults. Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with working memory and hippocampal volumes among older adults. Ask how they did it: untangling the relationships between task-specific strategy use, everyday strategy use, and associative memory. Development of the Telephone-based Daily Instrumental Activities of Living (T-DIAL) to assess financial management remotely in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1