How reliable is artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on CT images?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104519
Avallone Emilio , Pietro De Luca , Timm Max , Siani Agnese , Viola Pasquale , Ralli Massimo , Chiarella Giuseppe , Ricciardiello Filippo , Salzano Francesco Antonio , Scarpa Alfonso
{"title":"How reliable is artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on CT images?","authors":"Avallone Emilio ,&nbsp;Pietro De Luca ,&nbsp;Timm Max ,&nbsp;Siani Agnese ,&nbsp;Viola Pasquale ,&nbsp;Ralli Massimo ,&nbsp;Chiarella Giuseppe ,&nbsp;Ricciardiello Filippo ,&nbsp;Salzano Francesco Antonio ,&nbsp;Scarpa Alfonso","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 1","pages":"Article 104519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Results

The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures.

Conclusions

AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在CT图像上诊断胆脂瘤的可靠性如何?
目的:分析目前用于胆脂瘤CT诊断的主要人工智能(AI)模型,并对其性能进行评价和比较。人工智能在放射学中的应用越来越多,需要对现有方法进行系统的比较。方法:从主要数据库中选取相关文献进行系统的文献综述。纳入的研究必须在方法学、使用人工智能模型进行胆脂瘤诊断以及结果的敏感性和特异性方面满足特定标准。结果:meta分析包括三项研究,评估MobilenetV2、Densenet201和Resnet50人工智能模型。所有模型均显示出高水平的CT诊断胆脂瘤的敏感性和特异性。不同模型的性能之间没有统计学上的显著差异,这表明不同神经网络架构之间具有强大的通用诊断能力。结论:人工智能在影像学方面进展迅速,最近的研究已经显示出在胆脂瘤诊断方面的显著表现。技术发展的速度是有希望的。然而,为了确保在临床实践中安全有效地实施,需要进一步的研究来验证和标准化这些人工智能模型。未来的研究不仅要关注诊断的准确性,还要关注这些新兴技术的稳健性、可重复性和临床整合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
A clinical shift toward personalized cochlear implantation: Using preoperative planning to optimize insertion depth The role of metformin in dysplastic mucosa of the larynx: A follow up study Preliminary study on classification and treatment of type I variant preauricular fistula Preliminary study on classification and treatment of type I variant preauricular fistula Sarcopenia and postoperative morbidity in head & neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1