Sahar Ali , Shin Mei Chan , Anand Brahmandam , Yunshan Xu , Yanhong Deng , Ahmed Elbadawy , Alfred Lee , Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar
{"title":"The Incidence and Significance of Iliac Vein Stenosis in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis","authors":"Sahar Ali , Shin Mei Chan , Anand Brahmandam , Yunshan Xu , Yanhong Deng , Ahmed Elbadawy , Alfred Lee , Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The role of iliac vein stenosis (IVS) in the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is poorly understood. This study determines the incidence of IVS in patients diagnosed with DVT and assesses its impact on presentation and outcomes. Our hypothesis is that the presence of IVS increases the risk of long-term ipsilateral DVT recurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study of the electronic medical records of consecutive adult patients treated for lower extremity DVT was performed. Only patients with cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance with intravenous contrast) were included. Patient and DVT characteristics were recorded. Cross-sectional imaging was reviewed for the presence or absence of ipsilateral IVS (≥50%). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of IVS to compare characteristics and outcomes. Subgroup analyses on patients with provoked DVT, cancer-related DVT, and unprovoked DVT were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 548 patients with DVT and 32% had evidence of ipsilateral IVS on cross-sectional imaging. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or treatment methods between the 2 groups. There was a trend toward patients with IVS having less incidence of pulmonary embolism on presentation (22.9% vs. 29.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.1) but that difference did not reach statistical significance in the overall comparison. Subgroup analysis in patients with cancer-related DVT (<em>n</em> = 227) showed that patients with IVS were significantly more likely to develop ipsilateral recurrent DVT compared to patients with no IVS (12.9% vs. 4.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.045). Patients with unprovoked DVT with IVS had significantly lower pulmonary embolism on presentation than patients with unprovoked DVT without IVS (24.2% vs. 39.8%, <em>P</em> < 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ipsilateral ≥50% IVS is present in approximately a third of patients presenting with DVT. The presence of IVS seems to play a differential role in ipsilateral DVT recurrence and prevention of pulmonary embolization in different groups of patients presenting with DVT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 310-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624007295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The role of iliac vein stenosis (IVS) in the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is poorly understood. This study determines the incidence of IVS in patients diagnosed with DVT and assesses its impact on presentation and outcomes. Our hypothesis is that the presence of IVS increases the risk of long-term ipsilateral DVT recurrence.
Methods
A retrospective study of the electronic medical records of consecutive adult patients treated for lower extremity DVT was performed. Only patients with cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance with intravenous contrast) were included. Patient and DVT characteristics were recorded. Cross-sectional imaging was reviewed for the presence or absence of ipsilateral IVS (≥50%). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of IVS to compare characteristics and outcomes. Subgroup analyses on patients with provoked DVT, cancer-related DVT, and unprovoked DVT were performed.
Results
There were 548 patients with DVT and 32% had evidence of ipsilateral IVS on cross-sectional imaging. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or treatment methods between the 2 groups. There was a trend toward patients with IVS having less incidence of pulmonary embolism on presentation (22.9% vs. 29.7%, P = 0.1) but that difference did not reach statistical significance in the overall comparison. Subgroup analysis in patients with cancer-related DVT (n = 227) showed that patients with IVS were significantly more likely to develop ipsilateral recurrent DVT compared to patients with no IVS (12.9% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.045). Patients with unprovoked DVT with IVS had significantly lower pulmonary embolism on presentation than patients with unprovoked DVT without IVS (24.2% vs. 39.8%, P < 0.03).
Conclusions
Ipsilateral ≥50% IVS is present in approximately a third of patients presenting with DVT. The presence of IVS seems to play a differential role in ipsilateral DVT recurrence and prevention of pulmonary embolization in different groups of patients presenting with DVT.
目的:髂静脉狭窄(IVS)在DVT发展中的作用尚不清楚。本研究确定了诊断为DVT的患者中IVS的发生率,并评估其对表现和预后的影响。我们的假设是IVS的存在增加了同侧DVT长期复发的风险。方法:回顾性分析连续治疗下肢深静脉血栓的成人患者的电子病历。仅包括横断成像(CT或MR加静脉造影剂)的患者。记录患者及深静脉血栓特征。横断成像检查同侧IVS是否存在(≥50%)。根据是否存在IVS将患者分为两组,比较特征和结果。对诱发性深静脉血栓患者、癌症相关深静脉血栓患者和非诱发性深静脉血栓患者进行亚组分析。结果:548例深静脉血栓患者,32%的患者有同侧静脉血栓。两组患者的基线特征和治疗方法无显著差异。IVS患者首发时PE发生率有降低的趋势(22.9% vs 29.7%, P=0.1),但总体比较差异无统计学意义。癌症相关DVT患者的亚组分析(n=227)显示,与没有IVS的患者相比,IVS患者更容易发生同侧复发性DVT (12.9% vs 4.5%, P=0.045)。非诱发性DVT合并IVS的患者与无IVS的非诱发性DVT患者相比,出现时PE显著降低(24.2% vs 39.8%)。结论:大约三分之一的DVT患者出现同侧IVS≥50%。IVS的存在似乎在不同组DVT患者的同侧DVT复发和肺栓塞预防中起着不同的作用。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence