Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: evidence from a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.817
Darío Moreno-Agostino, Jenny Chanfreau, Gemma Knowles, Alina Pelikh, Jayati Das-Munshi, George B Ploubidis
{"title":"Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: evidence from a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Darío Moreno-Agostino, Jenny Chanfreau, Gemma Knowles, Alina Pelikh, Jayati Das-Munshi, George B Ploubidis","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected women's mental health. However, most evidence has focused on mental illbeing outcomes, and there is little evidence on the mechanisms underlying this unequal impact.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate gender differences in the long-term trajectories of life satisfaction, how these were affected during the pandemic and the role of time-use differences in explaining gender inequalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from 6766 (56.2% women) members of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70). Life satisfaction was prospectively assessed between the ages of 26 (1996) and 51 (2021) years, using a single question with responses ranging from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). We analysed life satisfaction trajectories with piecewise latent growth curve models, and investigated whether gender differences in the change in the life satisfaction trajectories with the pandemic were explained by self-reported time spent doing different paid and unpaid activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had consistently higher life satisfaction than men before the pandemic (Δ<sub>intercept,unadjusted</sub> = 0.213, 95% CI 0.087-0.340; <i>P =</i> 0.001) and experienced a more accelerated decline with the pandemic onset (Δ<sub>quad2,unadjusted</sub> = -0.018, 95% CI -0.026 to -0.011; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Time-use differences did not account for the more accelerated decrease in women's life satisfaction levels with the pandemic (Δ<sub>quad2,adjusted</sub> = -0.016, 95% CI -0.031 to -0.001; <i>P</i> = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows pronounced gender inequalities in the impact of the pandemic on the long-term life satisfaction trajectories of adults in their 50s, with women losing their pre-pandemic advantage over men. Self-reported time-use differences did not account for these inequalities. More research is needed to tackle gender inequalities in population mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected women's mental health. However, most evidence has focused on mental illbeing outcomes, and there is little evidence on the mechanisms underlying this unequal impact.

Aims: To investigate gender differences in the long-term trajectories of life satisfaction, how these were affected during the pandemic and the role of time-use differences in explaining gender inequalities.

Method: We used data from 6766 (56.2% women) members of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70). Life satisfaction was prospectively assessed between the ages of 26 (1996) and 51 (2021) years, using a single question with responses ranging from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). We analysed life satisfaction trajectories with piecewise latent growth curve models, and investigated whether gender differences in the change in the life satisfaction trajectories with the pandemic were explained by self-reported time spent doing different paid and unpaid activities.

Results: Women had consistently higher life satisfaction than men before the pandemic (Δintercept,unadjusted = 0.213, 95% CI 0.087-0.340; P = 0.001) and experienced a more accelerated decline with the pandemic onset (Δquad2,unadjusted = -0.018, 95% CI -0.026 to -0.011; P < 0.001). Time-use differences did not account for the more accelerated decrease in women's life satisfaction levels with the pandemic (Δquad2,adjusted = -0.016, 95% CI -0.031 to -0.001; P = 0.035).

Conclusions: Our study shows pronounced gender inequalities in the impact of the pandemic on the long-term life satisfaction trajectories of adults in their 50s, with women losing their pre-pandemic advantage over men. Self-reported time-use differences did not account for these inequalities. More research is needed to tackle gender inequalities in population mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间性别不平等对长期生活满意度轨迹的破坏以及时间使用的作用:来自前瞻性队列研究的证据
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对女性心理健康的影响尤为严重。然而,大多数证据都集中在精神疾病的结果上,几乎没有证据表明这种不平等影响的机制。目的:调查生活满意度长期轨迹中的性别差异,这些差异在大流行期间如何受到影响,以及时间使用差异在解释性别不平等方面的作用。方法:我们使用1970年英国队列研究(BCS70)的6766名成员(56.2%为女性)的数据。对26岁(1996年)至51岁(2021年)之间的生活满意度进行前瞻性评估,使用单一问题,回答范围从0(最低)到10(最高)。我们用分段潜在增长曲线模型分析了生活满意度轨迹,并调查了生活满意度轨迹变化中的性别差异是否可以用自我报告的从事不同有偿和无偿活动的时间来解释。结果:大流行前女性的生活满意度持续高于男性(Δintercept,未经调整= 0.213,95% CI 0.087-0.340;P = 0.001),并随着大流行的爆发而加速下降(Δquad2,未经调整= -0.018,95% CI -0.026至-0.011;P < 0.001)。时间使用差异并不能解释妇女生活满意度水平随着大流行而加速下降的原因(Δquad2,调整= -0.016,95% CI -0.031至-0.001;P = 0.035)。结论:我们的研究表明,大流行对50多岁成年人长期生活满意度轨迹的影响存在明显的性别不平等,女性失去了大流行前对男性的优势。自我报告的时间使用差异并不能解释这些不平等。需要更多的研究来解决人口心理健康方面的性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Assessment attendance and treatment engagement with talking and internet-enabled therapies of people with and without a long-term physical health condition: analysis of Talking Therapies service data. Predictors of mental health and academic outcomes in first-year university students: Identifying prevention and early-intervention targets - CORRIGENDUM. Casual associations between frailty and nine mental disorders: bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study. Childhood risk factors and clinical and service outcomes in adulthood in people with intellectual disabilities - CORRIGENDUM. 'It takes a village': patient lived experiences of residential treatment for an eating disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1